The effects of acupuncture versus sham/placebo acupuncture for insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

来自 PUBMED

作者:

Zhang JHe YHuang XLiu YYu H

展开

摘要:

Acupuncture has been found to be an effective treatment for insomnia. but it is not clear whether acupuncture is just a placebo effect. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and sham/placebo acupuncture. We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane from database inception through March 16, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared acupuncture therapy with sham/placebo acupuncture or no treatment. Restricted to English language. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to analyze risk of bias of the included randomized controlled trials (RCT). Data analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3. A total of 15 studies involving 1108 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that acupuncture therapy was superior to sham/placebo acupuncture in terms of improving Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), insomnia severity index (ISI), total sleep time (TST), sleep-onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE), even during the follow-up period, acupuncture therapy was superior to sham/placebo acupuncture on PSQI. Due to the obvious heterogeneity of the study, (1) for primary outcome (PSQI):subgroup analysis based on the type of acupuncture and placebo acupuncture showed that acupuncture was superior to placebo acupuncture lower PSQI: acupuncture was superior to placebo acupuncture (3RCTs,MD = -7.34,95% [-8.02,-6.66],I2 = 86%) and minimal acupuncture (5RCTs,MD = -3.29,95% [-3.95, -2.63],I2 = 53%), Auricular acupressure was superior to placebo acupuncture (1RCT,MD = -4.16,95% [-6.57, -1.75]), minimal acupuncture was superior to electroacupuncture (2RCTs, MD = 0.70,95%CI [0.52, 0.87],I2 = 0%), while there was no significant difference between auricular acupressure and minimal acupuncture, between electroacupuncture and placebo acupuncture. trials). (2) for secondary outcome (ISI,TST,WASO,SE,SOL).ISI, the ISI score of minimal acupuncture was lower than that of electroacupuncture (2RCTs,MD = 0.80,95%CI [0.55, 1.04],I2 = 0), acupuncture was lower placebo acupuncture (1RCT, MD = -7.89,95%CI [-10.15, -5.63]), There was no significant difference between electroacupuncture and minimal acupuncture. Conclusion: Based on the outcomes included in this study, the efficacy of acupuncture was superior to that of placebo acupuncture in treating insomnia. Types of acupuncture therapy and placebo may underestimate the efficacy of acupuncture in different ways.

收起

展开

DOI:

10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101253

被引量:

13

年份:

1970

SCI-Hub (全网免费下载) 发表链接

通过 文献互助 平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。

查看求助

求助方法1:

知识发现用户

每天可免费求助50篇

求助

求助方法1:

关注微信公众号

每天可免费求助2篇

求助方法2:

求助需要支付5个财富值

您现在财富值不足

您可以通过 应助全文 获取财富值

求助方法2:

完成求助需要支付5财富值

您目前有 1000 财富值

求助

我们已与文献出版商建立了直接购买合作。

你可以通过身份认证进行实名认证,认证成功后本次下载的费用将由您所在的图书馆支付

您可以直接购买此文献,1~5分钟即可下载全文,部分资源由于网络原因可能需要更长时间,请您耐心等待哦~

身份认证 全文购买

相似文献(312)

参考文献(0)

引证文献(13)

来源期刊

-

影响因子:暂无数据

JCR分区: 暂无

中科院分区:暂无

研究点推荐

关于我们

zlive学术集成海量学术资源,融合人工智能、深度学习、大数据分析等技术,为科研工作者提供全面快捷的学术服务。在这里我们不忘初心,砥砺前行。

友情链接

联系我们

合作与服务

©2024 zlive学术声明使用前必读