Contemporary management of chronic indwelling inferior vena cava filters.

Despite increasing retrieval rates of the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, less than one-third are removed within the recommended timeline. Prolonged filter dwell times may increase the technical difficulty of retrieval and filter-related complications. We sought to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of patients with chronic indwelling IVC filters at a tertiary care center. A retrospective analysis was performed from August 2015 through August 2019 of all patients who were referred for removal of a prolonged IVC filter with a dwell time >1 year. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate patients' characteristics and procedural outcomes, which were reviewed through electronic medical records. Data were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) or number and percentage, as appropriate. A total of 47 patients were identified with a median filter dwell time of 10.0 years (IQR, 6-13 years); 34 patients underwent IVC filter removal, and 13 patients refused retrieval. The median age of patients was 54.9 years (IQR, 42.5-64.0 years); the majority were female (57%) and white (53%). The most common indication for filter placement was high risk despite anticoagulation (49%), followed by venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (21%). The majority of patients were symptomatic (72%). If symptomatic, the most common reason for retrieval was IVC penetration (94%), and the chief complaint was pain (56%). Retrieval success was 97%, with a median length of stay of 0 days. The majority of retrievals were performed through an endovascular approach (97%). There was one postprocedural complication (3%). Despite prolonged dwell times, IVC filter retrieval can be performed safely and effectively in carefully selected patients at a tertiary referral center.

Ivanics T ，Williams P ，Nasser H ，Leonard-Murali S ，Schwartz S ，Lin JC ... -  《-》

Surgical Management of Perforated Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Management of complicated indwelling inferior vena cava (IVC) filters has increased due to low retrieval rates. Filter migration and perforation are infrequent complications and require explantation of the filter. We report our recent experience with endovascular retrieval and surgical explantation of IVC filters after caval perforation. This is a retrospective review of patients who had IVC filter explantation between 2014 and 2015. Patient demographics, indication for filter placement, clinical presentation, surgical indication and technique, and outcomes were noted. Five cases of IVC filter removal due to caval perforation were identified. Four patients were female, and the median age was 50. Four IVC filters were of the retrievable type and had an average indwelling time of 4 years. One filter was permanent with an indwelling time of 9 years. The most common presentation was abdominal pain. Four patients had an open operation: 2 performed via laparotomy and 2 with retroperitoneal exposure of the IVC. One patient required median sternotomy and explantation of device fragments that migrated to the right ventricle. One patient had endovascular retrieval, with filter indwelling time of 0.8 years. No mortality occurred related to device removal. All patients had resolution of pain at their postoperative visit. Patients presenting with abdominal pain and history of IVC filter placement should cause concern for possible caval strut perforation. Endovascular retrieval or surgical explantation are required for removal and can be accomplished with minimal risk to the patient.

Manzur M ，Ochoa C ，Ham SW ，Lee W ，Simcox T ，Rowe V ，Weaver F ... -  《-》

Asymptomatic patients with unsuccessful percutaneous inferior vena cava filter retrieval rarely develop complications despite strut penetrations through the caval wall.

We established a program for retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters within our hospital system. When percutaneous retrieval fails, we only recommend open surgical removal for symptoms and other complications. We examined our outcomes with conservative management of unsuccessful percutaneous retrieval and open surgical removal for symptomatic/complicated IVC filters. All patients with history of IVC filter placement who were referred to us for retrieval between 2010 and 2016 were evaluated. Before retrieval, patients were evaluated for risk of future venous thromboembolic events and ongoing need for IVC filtration. Asymptomatic patients with unsuccessful percutaneous filter retrieval were recommended to have annual follow-up with plain abdominal radiographs and to take daily low-dose aspirin. Patients with symptoms referable to the indwelling filter and those with complications were offered open surgical removal. There were 213 patients with a history of IVC filter placement who underwent 220 percutaneous attempts for retrieving 214 IVC filters (four patients had two attempts, one patient had three attempts). Technical success in percutaneously retrieving the filter was 180 of 214 (84.1%) at a median of 5.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.5-9.2) from implant. The median filter dwell time was significantly longer in unsuccessful compared with successful retrieval attempts (8.3 months [IQR, 4.3-15.1 months] vs 5.5 months [IQR, 3.2-8.7 months]; P = .011). Of the 34 filters in 33 patients that could not be retrieved percutaneously, all had either significant filter barb penetration through the caval wall or a tilt angle of greater than 15°. The majority of patients (67%) remained asymptomatic without any further complications over a mean follow-up of 24 months (IQR, 12-50 months). No asymptomatic patients developed symptoms or complications over the follow-up period. Two of the five patients who were symptomatic underwent open surgical removal via minilaparotomy. An additional six patients who failed percutaneous retrieval at other institutions were referred to us for open surgical removal owing to symptoms or complications. Technical success for all open surgical removal of IVC filters was 100%. All patients had resolution of their symptoms after percutaneous or open surgical removal. Asymptomatic patients with unsuccessful percutaneous IVC filter retrieval seem to have low complications in midterm follow-up despite significant filter strut penetration. Without symptoms or other complications, such patients do not require referral for open surgical filter removal. Symptomatic patients can expect low morbidity and resolution of symptoms after percutaneous or open surgical removal. Further studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of routinely removing asymptomatic IVC filters.

Pratt WB ，Sandhu HK ，Leake SS ，Jamshidy I ，Sola CN ，Afifi RO ，Safi HJ ，Charlton-Ouw KM ... -  《-》

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Long Term Complications and Retrieval Techniques: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Montoya C ，Rey J ，Polania-Sandoval CA ，Bornak A ，Shao T ，Kenel-Pierre S ... -  《-》

Removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters with computed tomography findings indicating tenting or penetration of the inferior vena cava wall.

To examine the feasibility and safety of removing retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters with struts external to the IVC wall on computed tomography (CT) imaging. This retrospective study included 64 IVC filter retrievals from 62 patients over a 5-year period. CT images obtained before retrieval were used to describe the various imaging characteristics of filter interactions with the IVC wall. Patient medical records were reviewed for filter type, results of filter removal with standard or nonstandard techniques, and complications. Filter struts outside the IVC wall were a common finding on CT with 55 (85.9%) filters showing some degree of perforation. Of 64 filters, 57 (89.1%) were removed successfully; 7 (10.9%) filters could not be removed because of incorporation of filter struts or tip into the IVC wall. Before retrieval, filter fracture was detected in eight (12.5%) cases, and IVC stenosis was present in three (4.7%) cases. No major complications occurred during any retrieval. Two (3.1%) cases were complicated by postprocedure abdominal pain. Both cases clinically resolved, and no abnormalities were detected on postprocedure CT. The appearance of filter struts tenting or penetrating the IVC wall is a common finding on CT performed before filter retrieval. IVC filters with these findings can be removed safely and should not be a contraindication for IVC filter retrieval.

Oh JC ，Trerotola SO ，Dagli M ，Shlansky-Goldberg RD ，Soulen MC ，Itkin M ，Mondschein J ，Solomon J ，Stavropoulos SW ... -  《-》