Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of clinically significant Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria in a Greek tertiary-care hospital, 2017-2019.

Antimicrobial resistance among anaerobic bacteria is increasingly recognized with geographic differences. In this study we analyzed the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 358 Gram-positive clinically significant anaerobes, isolated from 2017 to 2019, in a Greek tertiary-care hospital. The species identification was performed by Vitek 2 and conventional biochemical methods, and the antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the E-test method. The antimicrobial agents tested were penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, tigecycline and vancomycin. Clostridioides difficile isolates were also tested against tetracycline. The results were interpreted using the CLSI and the EUCAST breakpoints. Clostridium species accounted for 35.5% of the isolates, followed by Gram-positive cocci (GPAC) (33.2%) and non-spore-forming bacilli (31.3%). Beta-lactams, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, cefoxitin, carbapenems, chloramphenicol, tigecycline and vancomycin proved all effective against the GPAC tested. Clindamycin, moxifloxacin and metronidazole resistance varied among different species of GPAC. Clindamycin and moxifloxacin resistance observed was 10% and 5% for Cutibacterium acnes, 25% and 6.2% for Actinomyces odontolyticus and 40% and 5% for Clostridium perfringens. C. difficile isolates were fully susceptible to metronidazole, vancomycin, and tigecycline. Resistance rates to clindamycin, moxifloxacin and tetracycline were 62.9%, 30% and 24.3%, respectively. These data highlight the need for periodic surveillance to monitor changes in susceptibility profiles.

Maraki S ，Mavromanolaki VE ，Stafylaki D ，Kasimati A ... -  《-》

[Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Pathogenic Gram-positive Anaerobic Cocci: Data of a University Hospital in Turkey].

Akgül Ö ，Söyletir G ，Ülger Toprak N 《MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI》

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Anaerobic Bacterial Clinical Isolates From 2014 to 2016, Including Recently Named or Renamed Species.

Anaerobic bacterial resistance trends may vary across regions or institutions. Regional susceptibility patterns are pivotal in the empirical treatment of anaerobic infections. We determined the antimicrobial resistance patterns of clinically important anaerobic bacteria, including recently named or renamed anaerobes. A total of 521 non-duplicated clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were collected from a tertiary-care hospital in Korea between 2014 and 2016. Anaerobes were isolated from blood, body fluids, and abscess specimens. Each isolate was identified by conventional methods and by Bruker biotyper mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany) or VITEK matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the agar dilution method according to the CLSI guidelines. The following antimicrobials were tested: piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, cefotetan, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and metronidazole. Most Bacteroides fragilis isolates were susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and meropenem. The non-fragilis Bacteroides group (including B. intestinalis, B. nordii, B. pyogenes, B. stercoris, B. salyersiae, and B. cellulosilyticus) was resistant to meropenem (14%) and cefotetan (71%), and Parabacteroides distasonis was resistant to imipenem (11%) and cefotetan (95%). Overall, the Prevotella and Fusobacterium isolates were more susceptible to antimicrobial agents than the B. fragilis group isolates. Anaerobic gram-positive cocci exhibited various resistance rates to tetracycline (6-86%). Clostridioides difficile was highly resistant to penicillin, cefoxitin, imipenem, clindamycin, and moxifloxacin. Piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, and carbapenems are highly active β-lactam agents against most anaerobes, including recently named or renamed species.

Byun JH ，Kim M ，Lee Y ，Lee K ，Chong Y ... -  《-》

Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in recent clinical isolates of Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria in a Greek University Hospital.

The aim of our study was to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 267 Gram-negative clinically significant anaerobes, isolated between October 2016 and October 2019, in a Greek university hospital. The species identification was performed by conventional methods and using the Vitek 2 automated system. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing to determine the MICs was performed by the E-test method. The antimicrobial agents tested were penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol and tigecycline. The results were interpreted using the CLSI and FDA breakpoints. The majority of the isolates belonged to Bacteroides fragilis group (58.8%), followed by Prevotella spp. (23.2%), Fusobacterium spp. (11.2%) and Veillonella spp. (6.4%). The most prevalent types of infection were skin and soft tissue infections (34.8%), and inta-abdomonal infections (29.6%). Among all isolates tested, the lowest rates of resistance (<5%) were detected to carbapenems, metronidazole, chloramphenicol and tigecycline. Resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam was observed in 5.4%, 24.6%, 3.3% and 17.6%, of B. fragilis, B. fragilis group, Fusobacterium spp. and Veillonella spp. isolates, respectively. Although a high prevalence of resistance to clindamycin, cefoxitin, and moxifloxacin, was detected particularly among members of the B. fragilis group, cefoxitin resistance was low for Prevotella spp. (3.2%), Fusobacterium spp. (3.3%) and Veillonella spp. (0%). Our findings underscore the need for periodic monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in order to guide empirical therapy.

Maraki S ，Mavromanolaki VE ，Stafylaki D ，Kasimati A ... -  《-》

Antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical findings of significant anaerobic bacteria in southern Spain.

The objectives of this study were to report on the antimicrobial susceptibility of 276 clinically significant anaerobic bacteria belonging to the major genera isolated between May 2017 and November 2018 in a tertiary hospital in Granada (Spain) and to describe key clinical features of the patients. Species identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed against penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic, imipenem, meropenem, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole, vancomycin, and piperacillin-tazobactam using the gradient diffusion technique and EUCAST breakpoints (except for moxifloxacin). The most frequent anaerobes were Bacteroides (29.7%; n = 82), Clostridioides difficile (15.9%, n = 44), Prevotella (10.8%, n = 30), and Propionibacterium (10.7%, n = 25). Metronidazole was not universally active against all genera tested, and some isolates showed resistance to this drug. Almost all tested anaerobes were susceptible to carbapenems and amoxicillin-clavulanate except for Clostridioides difficile (resistance rate of 94%) and Bacteroides (19%), respectively. High overall resistance rates to clindamycin were observed, especially for genera Finegoldia (54%), Bacteroides (49%), and Prevotella (40%). Resistance rates to carbapenems and amoxicillin-clavulanate were very low for the majority of tested genera but were high for Clostridioides difficile and Bacteroides spp., respectively. Resistance to clindamycin was very high, especially for Bacteroides, Finegoldia magna, Prevotella and Peptoniphilus. Routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing for anaerobes contributes information on the global situation and allows empirical therapies to be selected in accordance with local data on resistant strains.

Cobo F ，Rodríguez-Granger J ，Pérez-Zapata I ，Sampedro A ，Aliaga L ，Navarro-Marí JM ... -  《-》