A Prospective Comparison of (18)F-prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-1007 Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Whole-body 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging, and Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Compute

Computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS) are the imaging modalities currently used for distant metastasis staging of prostate cancer (PCa). To compare standard staging modalities with newer and potentially more accurate imaging modalities. This prospective, single-centre trial (NCT03537391) enrolled 80 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk PCa (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥3 and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥20 and/or cT ≥ T3; March 2018-June 2019) to undergo primary metastasis staging with two standard and three advanced imaging modalities. The participants underwent the following five imaging examinations within 2 wk of enrolment and without a prespecified sequence: BS, CT, 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (99mTc-HMDP) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT, 1.5 T whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) using diffusion-weighted imaging, and 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 (18F-PSMA-1007) positron emission tomography(PET)-CT. Each modality was reviewed by two independent experts blinded to the results of the prior studies, who classified lesions as benign, equivocal, or malignant. Pessimistic and optimistic analyses were performed to resolve each equivocal diagnosis. The reference standard diagnosis was defined using all available information accrued during at least 12 mo of clinical follow-up. Patients with equivocal reference standard diagnoses underwent MRI and/or CT to search for the development of anatomical correspondence. PSMA PET-avid lesions without histopathological verification were rated to be malignant only if there was a corresponding anatomical finding suspicious for malignancy at the primary or follow-up imaging. Seventy-nine men underwent all imaging modalities except for one case of interrupted MRI. The median interval per patient between the first and the last imaging study was 8 d (interquartile range [IQR]: 6-9). The mean age was 70 yr (standard deviation: 7) and median PSA 12 ng/mL (IQR:7-23). The median follow-up was 435 d (IQR: 378-557). Metastatic disease was detected in 20 (25%) patients. The imaging modality 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT had superior sensitivity and highest inter-reader agreement. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for bone metastasis detection with PSMA PET-CT were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96) for readers 1 and 2, respectively, while the AUC values for BS, CT, SPECT-CT, and WBMRI were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58-0.84) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.67-0.92), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.39-0.67) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54-0.77), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65-0.89) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.96) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54-0.80), respectively, for the other four pairs of readers. The imaging method 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT detected metastatic disease in 11/20 patients in whom standard imaging was negative and influenced clinical decision making in 14/79 (18%) patients. In 12/79 cases, false positive bone disease was reported only by PSMA PET-CT. Limitations included a nonrandomised study setting and few histopathologically validated suspicious lesions. Despite the risk of false positive bone lesions, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT outperformed all other imaging methods studied for the detection of primary distant metastasis in high-risk PCa. In this report, we compared the diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging. It was found that 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT) was superior to the other imaging modalities studied for the detection of distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis of high-risk prostate cancer. PSMA PET-CT also appears to detect some nonmetastatic bone lesions.

Anttinen M ，Ettala O ，Malaspina S ，Jambor I ，Sandell M ，Kajander S ，Rinta-Kiikka I ，Schildt J ，Saukko E ，Rautio P ，Timonen KL ，Matikainen T ，Noponen T ，Saunavaara J ，Löyttyniemi E ，Taimen P ，Kemppainen J ，Dean PB ，Blanco Sequeiros R ，Aronen HJ ，Seppänen M ，Boström PJ ... -  《European Urology Oncology》

Prospective comparison of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, whole-body MRI and CT in primary nodal staging of unfavourable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

Malaspina S ，Anttinen M ，Taimen P ，Jambor I ，Sandell M ，Rinta-Kiikka I ，Kajander S ，Schildt J ，Saukko E ，Noponen T ，Saunavaara J ，Dean PB ，Sequeiros RB ，Aronen HJ ，Kemppainen J ，Seppänen M ，Boström PJ ，Ettala O ... -  《-》

More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using (18)F-PSMA PET/CT.

Pianou NK ，Stavrou PZ ，Vlontzou E ，Rondogianni P ，Exarhos DN ，Datseris IE ... -  《Hellenic Journal of Nuclear Medicine》

Fluorine-18-labelled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose and Localise Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Single-arm Paired Comparison (PEDAL).

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate is used for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, mpMRI has lower sensitivity for small tumours. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) offers increased sensitivity over conventional imaging. This study aims to determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA-PET/CT was superior to that of mpMRI for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) at biopsy. Between 2020 and 2021, a prospective multicentre single-arm phase 3 imaging trial enrolled patients with clinical suspicion for PCa to have both mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT (thorax to thigh), with reviewers blinded to the results of other imaging. Multiparametric MRI was considered positive for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3-5. PSMA-PET/CT was assessed quantitatively (positive maximum standardised uptake value [SUVmax] >7) and qualitatively (five-point lexicon of certainty). Patients underwent targeted and systematic biopsy, with the technique at the discretion of the treating urologist. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) ≥2. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy for detecting PCa, reported as sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curve. The secondary endpoints included a comparison of the diagnostic accuracy for detecting csPCa, assessing gains in combining PMSA-PET/CT with mpMRI to mpMRI alone. Of the 236 patients completing both mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT, 184 (76.7%) had biopsy. Biopsy histology was benign (n = 73), GG 1 (n = 27), and GG ≥2 (n = 84). The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI for detecting PCa (AUC 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69, 0.82) was higher than that of PSMA-PET/CT (AUC 0.63; 95% CI 0.56, 0.70, p = 0.03). The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI for detecting csPCa (AUC 0.72; 95% CI 0.67, 0.78) was higher than that of PSMA-PET/CT (AUC 0.62; 95% CI 0.55, 0.69) but not statistically significant (p = 0.27). A combination of PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI showed excellent sensitivity (98.8%, 95% CI 93.5%, 100%) and NPV (96%, 95% CI 79.6%, 99.9%) over mpMRI alone (86.9% and 80.7%, respectively, p = 0.01). Thirty-two patients (13.6%) had metastatic disease. They tended to be older (68.4 vs 65.1 yr, p = 0.023), and have higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA; median PSA 9.6 vs 6.2ng/ml, p < 0.001) and abnormal prostate on digital rectal examination (78.2% vs 44.1%, p < 0.001). Multiparametric MRI had superior diagnostic accuracy to PSMA-PET/CT for detecting PCa, though the difference is not significant in case of csPCa detection. A combination of mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT showed improved sensitivity and NPV. PSMA-PET/CT could be considered for diagnostic use in patients unable to have mpMRI or those with concerning clinical features but negative mpMRI. In this trial, we compared the ability of 18F-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) with that of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to diagnose prostate cancer by biopsy in a prostate-specific antigen screening population. We found that MRI was superior to PSMA to diagnose prostate cancer, though there was no difference in ability to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. PSMA-PET/CT could be considered for diagnostic use in patients unable to have mpMRI or those with concerning clinical features but negative mpMRI. Combining MRI with PSMA-PET increases the negative predictive value over MRI alone and may help men avoid invasive prostate biopsy.

Wong LM ，Sutherland T ，Perry E ，Tran V ，Spelman T ，Corcoran N ，Lawrentschuk N ，Woo H ，Lenaghan D ，Buchan N ，Bax K ，Symons J ，Saeed Goolam A ，Chalasani V ，Hegarty J ，Thomas L ，Christov A ，Ng M ，Khanani H ，Lee SF ，Taubman K ，Tarlinton L ... -  《European Urology Oncology》

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.

The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the initial staging of men with prostate cancer (PCa) has yet to be evaluated adequately. To investigate the concordance of PSMA PET/CT with conventional imaging (CI) with cross-sectional abdominopelvic and/or radionuclide bone imaging in the initial staging of patients with treatment-naïve PCa. We performed a post hoc retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in a prospective single-arm trial (NCT03368547). We included patients with intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) PCa who underwent PSMA PET/CT within 6 mo of CI. Patients with any treatment prior to PSMA PET/CT were excluded. Patient- and tumor-specific data, and imaging findings were obtained. Our primary outcome measurement was the concordance rate of PSMA PET/CT with CI for the identification of N, M1a, M1b, and M1c disease. Descriptive statistics were used. A total of 168 patients with treatment-naïve IR and HR PCa met the inclusion criteria. HR disease accounted for 124/168 (73.8%) patients. The median prostate-specific antigen was 11.4 (6.8-24.6)ng/ml. The rates of nonconcordance between PSMA PET/CT and CI were 34/162 (21.0%), 5/70 (7.1%), 8/92 (8.7%), and 1/71 (1.4%) for N, M1a, M1b, and M1c disease, respectively. PSMA PET/CT assigned a higher stage in 37/168 (22.0%) patients and a lower stage in 12/170 (7.1%) patients. In a subset of 50 patients treated with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, the prevalence of PSMA PET/CT-positive and that of CI-positive nodal disease were 14% and 4%, and the false negative rates were 30% and 32%, respectively. The principal limitations of this study include the heterogeneity in CI modalities and the 6-mo time frame between CI and PSMA PET. PSMA PET/CT imaging may serve as a valuable tool in the initial staging of treatment-naïve IR and HR PCa. We evaluated how prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared with standard imaging (such as computed tomography, bone scan, and prostate magnetic resonance imaging) for initial staging of patients with prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that PSMA PET/CT may detect and rule out more metastatic lesions, which could prove valuable in guiding treatment.

Lenis AT ，Pooli A ，Lec PM ，Sadun TY ，Johnson DC ，Lebacle C ，Fendler WP ，Eiber M ，Czernin J ，Reiter RE ，Calais J ... -  《European Urology Oncology》