Psychometric analysis of the Arabic (Saudi) Tilburg Frailty Indicator among Saudi community-dwelling older adults.

Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome that can be screened using validated questionnaires. A commonly used assessment is the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), containing fifteen self-reported questions about components of frailty, with scores ranging from zero to fifteen (higher scores representing increased frailty and a cutoff score of greater than five used to diagnose frailty). Despite its widespread use, the TFI is not commonly used in Arabic-speaking countries, and there is an overall lack of Arabic-translated questionnaires to adequately detect and measure frailty for older adults in Saudi Arabia. To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) specifically for use with the Saudi population, and to examine reliability and construct validity among adults in senior-living facilities in Saudi Arabia. A total of 84 community-dwelling older adults were enrolled (mean age = 72 ± 4.7 years). The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the TFI from English to Arabic was performed using standardized guidelines. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were examined in two visits, spaced one-week apart. Construct validity of the TFI against other measurements related to frailty was examined. The physical domain for TFI was validated against the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), the timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and gait speed (as part of the SPPB). The psychological domains were validated against the Patient Health Questionnaire, and the social domains were validated against the social domain scores from the WHOQOL-BREF. The internal consistency of the TFI with the overall KR-20 was 0.70. For the domain scores KR-20 was 0.68 for the physical, 0.57 for the psychological, and 0.42 for the social. The KR-20 after deletion of each item correlations ranged from 0.66 to 0.72. For the test-retest reliability with one-week interval, the ICC was 0.86 (95 % CI = 0.67-0.94). The Arabic TFI showed statistically significant association with other measurements related to frailty. This study found that the translated Arabic (Saudi) TFI is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing the frailty among Saudi community-dwelling older adults. Our results suggest that the use of this Arabic-translated TFI for clinical screening of frailty in any primary health setting may aid continued understanding for the validity of this instrument and help provide a quantitative diagnostic tool for the prevention and treatment of frailty.

Alqahtani BA ，Abdelbasset WK ，Alenazi AM 《-》

Assessment of frailty in Saudi community-dwelling older adults: validation of measurements.

Alqahtani BA ，Nasser TA 《-》

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Testing of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) Amharic Version for Screening Frailty in Community-Dwelling Ethiopian Older People.

Frailty is a global health problem, including in African countries. Despite this, no reliable or valid frailty instruments incorporate any African language, and no research exists to cross-culturally adapt and test the validity and reliability of instruments commonly used in other countries for use within African countries. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) is a reliable and validated instrument with the potential to be relevant for older populations living in Africa. This study aimed to develop the TFI Amharic (TFI-AM) version for use within Ethiopia. This study employed psychometric testing and the evaluation of a translated and adapted instrument. The original English language version of the TFI was translated and culturally adapted into Amharic using the World Health Organization process of translation and adaptation of an instrument. A convenience sample of ninety-six community-dwelling older people 60 years and over was recruited. Cronbach's alpha was used for the analysis of the internal consistency of the TFI Amharic (TFI-AM) version using IBM SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Face and content validities of the TFI-AM were determined. The TFI-AM total mean score was 5.76 (±2.89). The internal consistency of the TFI-AM was very good with an overall Cronbach alpha value of 0.82. The physical domain showed the highest reliability with a 0.75 Cronbach's alpha value while the social domain was the lowest with a 0.68 Cronbach's alpha value. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients of the instrument ranged from 0.68 to 0.75. The item content validity index value ranged from 0.83 to 1.0 and the total content validity index average for the instrument was 0.91. The TFI-AM is reliable, valid, and reproducible for the assessment of frailty among community-dwelling older populations in Ethiopia. TFI-AM proved an easy-to-administer, applicable and fast instrument for assessing frailty in community-dwelling older populations.

Kasa AS ，Drury P ，Chang HR ，Lee SC ，Traynor V ... -  《Clinical Interventions in Aging》

Reliability and validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older people.

To translate the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) into Chinese and assess its reliability and validity. A sample of 917 community-dwelling older people, aged ≥60 years, in a Chinese city was included between August 2015 and March 2016. Construct validity was assessed using alternative measures corresponding to the TFI items, including self-rated health status (SRH), unintentional weight loss, walking speed, timed-up-and-go tests (TUGT), making telephone calls, grip strength, exhaustion, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), Geriatric Depression scale (GDS-15), emotional role, Adaptability Partnership Growth Affection and Resolve scale (APGAR) and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Fried's phenotype and frailty index were measured to evaluate criterion validity. Adverse health outcomes (ADL and IADL disability, healthcare utilization, GDS-15, SSRS) were used to assess predictive (concurrent) validity. The internal consistency reliability was good (Cronbach's α=0.71). The test-retest reliability was strong (r=0.88). Kappa coefficients showed agreements between the TFI items and corresponding alternative measures. Alternative measures correlated as expected with the three domains of TFI, with an exclusion that alternative psychological measures had similar correlations with psychological and physical domains of the TFI. The Chinese TFI had excellent criterion validity with the AUCs regarding physical phenotype and frailty index of 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. The predictive (concurrent) validities of the adverse health outcomes and healthcare utilization were acceptable (AUCs: 0.65-0.83). The Chinese TFI has good validity and reliability as an integral instrument to measure frailty of older people living in the community in China.

Dong L ，Liu N ，Tian X ，Qiao X ，Gobbens RJJ ，Kane RL ，Wang C ... -  《-》

Validity and Reliability of the Polish Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI).

Uchmanowicz I ，Jankowska-Polańska B ，Uchmanowicz B ，Kowalczuk K ，Gobbens RJ ... -  《-》