Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire: feasibility of utilizing one-day versus seven-day symptom reporting.

Patient-reported outcomes are important measures to include in pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials but are not widely utilized in clinical practice. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (PAH-SYMPACT) is the only pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific patient-reported outcomes instrument developed and validated in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration guidance on patient-reported outcomes development. The PAH-SYMPACT tool measures pulmonary arterial hypertension-related symptoms and impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension on daily life. Symptoms are reported each day for seven consecutive days, and the impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension over one week is recalled and reported on day 7; however, daily symptom reporting may overburden patients and healthcare resources, limiting the practicality of PAH-SYMPACT outside of clinical trials. To determine the practicability of an abridged version of PAH-SYMPACT for which all reporting is completed on one day, symptom data from the SYMPHONY trial (NCT01841762; PAH-SYMPACT validation study) were retrospectively analyzed to assess whether symptoms reported on each day correlated with the weekly average and whether one-day symptom scores were sensitive to disease severity. Correlation coefficients comparing the weekly average and individual day symptom scores were mostly high or very high regardless of the day they were measured. Findings were similar when using either Spearman's rank correlation or weighted kappa method. One-day symptom scores differentiated well between World Health Organization functional classes II and III/IV pulmonary arterial hypertension and were sensitive to change in disease severity as measured by the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Severity. These data suggest that the one-day PAH-SYMPACT is feasible and appropriate for routine implementation in clinical practice.

Frantz RP ，Chin KM ，Zhao C ，Flynn M ，Badesch D ... -  《-》

Psychometric Validation of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) Questionnaire: Results of the SYMPHONY Trial.

Disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are important in assessing the impact of disease and treatment. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire is the first instrument for quantifying pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and impacts developed according to the 2009 US Food and Drug Administration PRO guidance; previous qualitative research in patients with PAH supported its initial content validity. Content finalization and psychometric validation were conducted by using data from A Study of Macitentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension to Validate the PAH-SYMPACT (SYMPHONY), a single-arm, 16-week trial with macitentan 10 mg in US patients with PAH. Item performance, Rasch analysis, and factor analyses were used to select the final item content of the PRO and to define its domain structure. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, known-group and construct validity, sensitivity to change, and influence of oxygen on item performance were evaluated. Data from 278 patients (79% female; mean age: 60 years) were analyzed. Following removal of redundant/misfitting items, the final questionnaire has 11 symptom items across two domains (cardiopulmonary and cardiovascular symptoms) and 11 impact items across two domains (physical and cognitive/emotional impacts). Differential item function analysis confirmed that PRO scoring is unaffected by oxygen use. For all four domains, internal consistency reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80), and scores were highly reproducible in stable patients (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.84-0.94). Correlations with the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review questionnaire and the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey were moderate to high ([r] = 0.34-0.80). The questionnaire differentiated well between patients with varying disease severity levels and was sensitive to improvements in clinician- and patient-reported disease severity. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire is a brief, disease-specific PRO instrument possessing good psychometric properties that can be administered in clinical practice and clinical studies. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01841762; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Chin KM ，Gomberg-Maitland M ，Channick RN ，Cuttica MJ ，Fischer A ，Frantz RP ，Hunsche E ，Kleinman L ，McConnell JW ，McLaughlin VV ，Miller CE ，Zamanian RT ，Zastrow MS ，Badesch DB ... -  《-》

Development of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT®) questionnaire: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for PAH.

McCollister D ，Shaffer S ，Badesch DB ，Filusch A ，Hunsche E ，Schüler R ，Wiklund I ，Peacock A ，IRB information for the 5 clinical sites ... -  《RESPIRATORY RESEARCH》

The feasibility and value of assessing patient-reported outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive pulmonary vascular disease that negatively impacts health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The PAH-symptoms and impact (PAH-SYMPACT) questionnaire is a validated disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that assesses a patient's symptoms and the impact of PAH and its treatment on well-being. We performed a single-center prospective cohort study of patients with PAH to determine the feasibility of assessing PROs in clinical practice and to determine the association between PAH-SYMPACT domains and clinical characteristics and outcomes. One hundred and ten patients completed the 1-day version of the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire which consists of 22 Likert-scale questions that assess HRQOL across four domains: cardiopulmonary (CP) symptoms, cardiovascular (CV) symptoms, physical impact (PI), and cognitive and emotional (CE) impact. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL. Patients were predominantly female (n = 86, 78%) with a mean age of 57.8 ± 16.2 years. While several patient characteristics were associated with CP and PI domains, few were associated with CV and CE domains. PI and CE impact scores were associated with recent hospitalizations and mortality and CE impact score was independently associated with an increased risk of death after adjustment for disease severity (hazard ratio: 3.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.56-6.91, p = 0.002). In conclusion, the assessment of PROs in clinical practice using the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire is both feasible and valuable. PAH-SYMPACT scores have independent prognostic value and are not adequately reflected by traditional measures of disease severity. These findings underscore the importance of assessing HRQOL in clinical practice.

DuBrock HM ，Reddy YN ，Durst LA ，Schroeder DR ，Park G ，Cajigas HR ，Kane GC ，Kushwaha SS ，McCully RB ，Murphy JG ，Anand V ，Krowka MJ ，Frantz RP ... -  《-》

Using PAH-SYMPACT to assess quality of life in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic lung disease.

Chronic lung disease (CLD) is the second leading cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although PH associated with CLD (PH-CLD) leads to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL), there are no validated tools to assess HRQOL in PH-CLD. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (PAH-SYMPACT) is an HRQOL instrument aimed at assessing the symptoms and impact of PH on overall function and well-being. We performed a single-center prospective cohort study using PAH-SYMPACT scores to compare symptoms, exercise capacity and HRQOL in patients with PAH and PH-CLD. One hundred and twenty-five patients (99 patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH and 26 with PH-CLD) completed the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire which consists of 22 questions that assess HRQOL across four domains: cardiopulmonary (CP) symptoms, cardiovascular (CV) symptoms, physical impact (PI), and cognitive/emotional (CE) impact. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL. We compared patients with PAH and PH-CLD using a Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-squared test as appropriate. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between PH classification and SYMPACT scores. Compared to PAH, patients with PH-CLD were older, more likely to use oxygen and had worse functional class and exercise capacity. While there was no significant difference between the two groups in CP, CV, or CE domain scores, patients with PH-CLD had significantly worse PI scores by univariate (1.79 vs. 1.13, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (1.61 vs. 1.17, p = 0.02) and overall worse SYMPACT scores (1.19 vs. 0.91, p = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with PH-CLD have worse HRQOL as assessed by the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire versus patients with PAH. Although PAH-SYMPACT has not been validated in PH-CLD, the results of this study can guide clinicians in understanding the symptoms and impact of PH-CLD relative to PAH.

Bailey ME ，Durst L ，Cajigas HR ，Kane GC ，Krowka MJ ，Kushwaha SS ，McCully RB ，Murphy JG ，Reddy YN ，Frantz RP ，DuBrock HM ... -  《-》