Stressor-Cortisol Concordance Among Individuals at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis: Novel Findings from the NAPLS Cohort.

Whilst elevations in basal cortisol levels have been reported among individuals at-risk for psychosis, the extent to which this represents hyperresponsivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to psychosocial stressors encountered in the natural environment is currently unclear. We aimed to examine stressor-cortisol concordance among youth at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis in the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study 2 (NAPLS 2) and the relationship with clinical outcome. At baseline, CHR (N = 457) and healthy (N = 205) individuals provided salivary cortisol samples and completed daily stressor, life event, and childhood trauma measures. CHR youth were categorised as remitted, symptomatic, progression of positive symptoms, or psychosis conversion at the two-year follow-up. Within-group regression models tested associations between psychosocial stressors and cortisol; standardised beta coefficients (Stβ) were subsequently derived to enable within-group pooling of effect sizes across stressor types. After adjustment for potential confounders, all CHR subgroups reported greater exposure to life events and daily stressors, and more distress in relation to these events, relative to controls. All CHR groups were also more likely to experience childhood trauma; only CHR converters, however, were characterised by elevated basal cortisol. Daily stressor distress was significantly associated with cortisol in controls (β = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.12-1.08) and CHR youth who converted to psychosis (β = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.05-1.78). In controls only, life event exposure was associated with cortisol (β = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.08-0.83). When pooled across stressors, stressor-cortisol concordance was substantially higher among CHR converters (Stβ = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.44) relative to CHR progressed (Stβ = 0.02, 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.15), symptomatic (Stβ = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.12), and remitted groups (Stβ = 0.00, 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.13); however, unexpectedly, healthy controls showed intermediate levels of concordance (Stβ = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.26). In conclusion, whilst all CHR subgroups showed increased psychosocial stress exposure and distress relative to controls, only those who later converted to psychosis were characterised by significantly elevated basal cortisol levels. Moreover, only CHR converters showed a higher magnitude of stressor-cortisol concordance compared to controls, although confidence intervals overlapped considerably between these two groups. These findings do not support the notion that all individuals at CHR for psychosis show HPA hyperresponsiveness to psychosocial stressors. Instead, CHR individuals vary in their response to stressor exposure/distress, perhaps driven by genetic or other vulnerability factors.

Cullen AE ，Addington J ，Bearden CE ，Stone WS ，Seidman LJ ，Cadenhead KS ，Cannon TD ，Cornblatt BA ，Mathalon DH ，McGlashan TH ，Perkins DO ，Tsuang MT ，Woods SW ，Walker EF ... -  《-》

Salivary cortisol in early psychosis: New findings and meta-analysis.

Schizophrenia is a multifactorial disorder and environmental risk factors for it might contribute to hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) dysregulation. While increased cortisol levels have been reported in schizophrenia, as well as in early psychosis (compared to healthy controls), a crucial unresolved issue is whether elevated cortisol levels could be related to the distress of an emerging illness, rather than being specific to psychosis. Here, we report new findings from the first French cohort of young help-seekers (ICAAR) including ultra-high risk subjects (UHR), first-episode of psychosis (FEP) and non at-risk help seekers controls (HSC), followed by a meta-analysis of all available reports on salivary basal cortisol levels in early psychosis (UHR and FEP). In the ICAAR study, 169 individuals (15-30 years old) had their basal cortisol levels sampled and they were categorized (at baseline) as either UHR, FEP, or HSC using the criteria of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). The three groups were compared at baseline, and the UHR and HSC individuals were also included in a one-year longitudinal follow-up. UHRs who converted to psychosis at the follow up (UHR-P) were compared to non-converters (UHR-NP). We also performed a meta-analysis from case-control studies with basal salivary measures of cortisol, drawing from a systematic bibliographic search using the keywords 'cortisol', 'glucocorticoid', 'HPA' with 'UHR', 'CHR', 'at-risk mental state', 'schizotypal ', 'prodromal schizophrenia', 'first-episode psychosis', 'first episode schizophrenia', 'newly diagnosed schizophrenia', 'recent onset schizophrenia' [in Medline, Web of Knowledge (WOS), EBSCO], followed by a systematic screening of the resulting articles. Basal cortisol levels were not significantly different between UHR, FEP, and HSC controls in the ICAAR cohort. Interestingly, initial cortisol levels were correlated with positive symptoms at the one year follow-up in the ICAAR cohort. The meta-analysis revealed a significant elevation of the salivary basal cortisol levels in UHR individuals compared to controls (8 studies--1060 individuals), but not between FEP and controls (6 studies--441 individuals). Indirect comparison of salivary basal cortisol levels between UHR and FEP did not yield significant differences. Finally, no differences were detected between the baseline cortisol of UHR-P and UHR-NP (4 studies--301 individuals). The meta-analysis (including new data) indicates that basal cortisol levels were increased in UHR compared to controls, but FEP levels were not different from UHR or controls. Many confounding factors could decrease the effect size in FEP especially medication intake. Taken together with our new results (which made use of help-seeker controls, and not merely healthy controls), the findings indicate that basal cortisol levels may not be a reliable biomarker for early psychosis. Further studies are needed to clarify the precise role of the HPA axis in psychotic conversion.

Chaumette B ，Kebir O ，Mam-Lam-Fook C ，Morvan Y ，Bourgin J ，Godsil BP ，Plaze M ，Gaillard R ，Jay TM ，Krebs MO ... -  《-》

The relations of age and pubertal development with cortisol and daily stress in youth at clinical risk for psychosis.

Prodromal syndromes often begin in adolescence - a period of neurodevelopmental changes and heightened stress sensitivity. Research has shown elevated stress and cortisol in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. This cross-sectional study examined relations of age and pubertal status with cortisol and self-reported stress in healthy controls (HCs) and CHR adolescents. It was hypothesized that the relations of age and pubertal stage with cortisol and stress would be more pronounced in CHR youth. Participants were 93 HCs and 348 CHR adolescents from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS). At baseline, measures of stress (Daily Stress Inventory - DSI), Tanner stage (TS), and salivary cortisol were obtained. ANCOVA revealed increased DSI scores with age for both groups, and higher DSI scores in CHR adolescents than HCs, with a more pronounced difference for females. Contrary to prediction, with age controlled, HCs showed greater TS-related DSI increases. Analysis of cortisol showed no significant interactions, but a main effect of age and a trend toward higher cortisol in the CHR group. Correlations of cortisol with TS were higher in HC than CHR group. Stress measures increased with age in HC and CHR adolescents, and DSI scores also increased with TS in HCs. The results do not support a more pronounced age or TS increase in stress measures in CHR adolescents, but instead suggest that stress indices tend to be elevated earlier in adolescence in the CHR group. Potential determinants of findings and future directions are discussed.

Moskow DM ，Addington J ，Bearden CE ，Cadenhead KS ，Cornblatt BA ，Heinssen R ，Mathalon DH ，McGlashan TH ，Perkins DO ，Seidman LJ ，Tsuang MT ，Cannon TD ，Woods SW ，Walker EF ... -  《-》

HPA-axis function, symptoms, and medication exposure in youths at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Increased basal cortisol secretion has been associated with heightened clinical risk for psychosis, and among at-risk individuals, has been variably related to positive and mood symptoms, as well as clinical outcome. Basal salivary cortisol secretion was assessed in 33 patients at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis (21 medication-free and 12 taking a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and/or atypical antipsychotic), and 13 healthy controls. Among the CHR patients, we also examined associations of basal salivary cortisol with symptoms (positive, negative, mood, stress sensitivity) and clinical outcome. Basal salivary cortisol secretion was significantly higher in CHR patients who were medication-free compared to CHR patients taking medications and to healthy controls. In this small cohort, basal salivary cortisol secretion was associated at trend level with stress sensitivity, and was not significantly related to other symptoms. Our finding of elevated basal cortisol secretion in CHR patients supports the premise that excess activation of the HPA axis and/or neuroendocrine abnormalities characterize the psychosis risk state for at least a subset of patients. Our findings further suggest that psychotropic medications may have a normalizing effect on HPA-axis dysfunction in CHR patients, which could potentially inform intervention strategies for the prodrome.

Sugranyes G ，Thompson JL ，Corcoran CM 《-》

Cortisol Responses to Naturally Occurring Psychosocial Stressors Across the Psychosis Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Individuals with established psychosis and those at high-risk for the disorder have been found to show abnormalities within the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, including elevations in basal and diurnal cortisol, but a blunted cortisol awakening response. However, the extent to which these features are associated with psychosocial stressors encountered in the natural environment (which are known to be more commonly experienced by these groups, and more distressing) is currently unclear. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the concordance between naturally-occurring psychosocial stressors and cortisol levels in these populations. PubMed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched up to November 2019 to identify studies examining the concordance between psychosocial stressors and cortisol in healthy controls and individuals on the psychosis spectrum (patients with established psychosis and/or high-risk individuals). An overall meta-analysis (including data for all stressor-cortisol pairings) was performed to determine the degree of concordance irrespective of group status, with meta-regression employed to test whether the degree of concordance differed in established psychosis and high-risk groups compared to controls. Planned stratified analyses were then performed to examine group differences (where established psychosis and high-risk groups were combined) within individual stressor-cortisol pairings. Eighteen studies (16 datasets) were eligible for inclusion. The overall model, comprising 134 effect sizes, showed that stressors and cortisol measures were only weakly correlated [r=0.05 (95% CI: -0.00 to 0.10), p=0.059] and that neither established psychosis status (r=0.01, p=0.838) nor high-risk status (r=0.02, p=0.477) had a significant effect of the strength of correlation. In stratified analyses, significant differences between healthy controls and psychosis spectrum groups were observed for only one of the six stressor-cortisol pairings examined, where life event exposure and diurnal cortisol were positively correlated in controls [r=0.25 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.46)], but negatively correlated in the psychosis spectrum group [r=-0.28 (95% CI: -0.49 to -0.04)]. Overall, we observed poor concordance between naturally-occurring psychosocial stressors and cortisol irrespective of stressor type, cortisol measure, or group status. We consider a range of methodological factors that may have obscured the ability to detect "true" associations and provide recommendations for future studies in this field.

Cullen AE ，Rai S ，Vaghani MS ，Mondelli V ，McGuire P ... -  《-》