Haploidentical- versus identical-sibling transplant for high-risk pediatric AML: A multi-center study.

Human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donor (ISD)-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for high-risk pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A haploidentical donor (HID) is readily available to almost all children. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with HID-SCT had similar outcomes compared to ISD-SCT for pediatric and adult AML. However, the role of HID-SCT in high-risk pediatric AML is unclear. To compare the overall survival of high-risk AML children who underwent either HID-SCT or ISD-SCT, we analyzed 179 cases of high-risk AML patients under 18 years of age treated with either ISD-SCT (n = 23) or HID-SCT (n = 156). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus anti-thymocyte globulin-based regimens were used for HID-SCT. We also analyzed the subgroup data of AML patients at first complete remission (CR1) before SCT with known cytogenetic risk. The numbers of adverse cytogenetic risk recipients were 8 (34.8%) and 13 (18.8%) in the ISD-SCT group and the HID-SCT group, and the number of patients with disease status beyond CR1 were 6 (26.1%) and 14 (20.3%) in the two groups. The cumulative rates of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 13.0% in the ISD-SCT group and 34.8% in the HID-SCT group (P = 0.062), with a three-year cumulative rates of chronic GVHD at 14.1% and 34.9%, respectively (P = 0.091). The relapse rate in the ISD-SCT group was significantly higher than that in the HID-SCT group (39.1% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.027); with non-relapse mortality at 0.0% and 10.6% (P = 0.113), respectively. The three-year overall survival rates were 73.0% for the ISD-SCT group and 74.6% for the HID-SCT group (P = 0.689). In subgroup analysis, the three-year relapse rate in the ISD-SCT group was higher than that in the HID-SCT group (50.0% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.001) and the three-year DFS in the ISD-SCT group (50.0%) was lower than that in the HID-SCT group (81.2%) (P = 0.021). Unmanipulated HID-SCT achieved DFS and OS outcomes comparable to those of ISD-SCT for high-risk pediatric AML patients with potentially higher rate but manageable GVHD.

Zheng FM ，Zhang X ，Li CF ，Cheng YF ，Gao L ，He YL ，Wang Y ，Huang XJ ... -  《Cancer Communications》

Unmanipulated haplo-identical donor transplantation compared with identical sibling donor had better anti-leukemia effect for refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia not in remission status.

Lu Y ，Zhao YL ，Zhang JP ，Xiong M ，Cao XY ，Liu DY ，Sun RJ ，Wei ZJ ，Zhou JR ，Lu DP ... -  《-》

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion after haploidentical versus matched-sibling PBSCT in very high-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Gao XN ，Lin J ，Wang LJ ，Li F ，Li HH ，Wang SH ，Huang WR ，Gao CJ ，Yu L ，Liu DH ... -  《-》

Comparable outcomes among unmanipulated haploidentical, matched unrelated, and matched sibling donors in BU-based myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for intermediate and adverse risk acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission: a singl

Lu Y ，Zhao YL ，Zhang JP ，Xiong M ，Cao XY ，Liu DY ，Sun RJ ，Wei ZJ ，Zhou JR ，Lu DP ... -  《-》

Haploidentical versus Cord Blood Transplantation in Pediatric AML. A Retrospective Outcome Analysis on Behalf of the Pediatric Subcommittee of GETH (Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético).

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) and cord blood transplantation (CBT) are both effective alternative treatments in patients suffering from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and lacking a matched HLA donor. In the last years, many centers have abandoned CBT procedures mostly due to concern about poorer immune recovery compared with Haplo-SCT. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study comparing the outcomes using both alternative approaches in AML. A total of 122 transplants (86 Haplo-SCTs and 36 CBTs) from 12 Spanish centers were collected from 2007 to 2021. Median age at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was 7 years (0.4-20). Thirty-nine patients (31.9%) showed positive minimal residual disease (MRD) at HSCT and a previous HSCT was performed in 37 patients (30.3%). The median infused cellularity was 14.4 × 106/kg CD34+ cells (6.0-22.07) for Haplo-SCT and 4.74 × 105/kg CD34+ cells (0.8-9.4) for CBT. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 14 days (7-44) for Haplo-SCT and 17 days (8-29) for CBT (P = .03). The median time to platelet engraftment was 14 days (6-70) for Haplo-SCT and 43 days (10-151) for CBT (P < .001). Graft rejection was observed in 13 Haplo-SCTs (15%) and in 6 CBTs (16%). The cumulative incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) grades II-IV was 54% and 51% for Haplo-SCT and CBT, respectively (P = .50). The cumulative incidence of severe acute GvHD (grades III-IV) was 22% for Haplo-SCT and 25% for CBT (P = .90). There was a tendency to a higher risk of chronic GvHD in the Haplo-SCT group being the cumulative incidence of 30% for Haplo-SCT and 12% for CBT (P = .09). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 28% and 20% for Haplo-SCT and CBT, respectively (P = .60). We did not observe statistically significant differences in outcome measures between Haplo-SCT and CBT procedures: 5-year overall survival (OS) was 64% versus 57% (P = .50), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) 58% versus 57% (P = .80), GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (GFRFS) 41% versus 54% (P = .30), and cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) 14% versus 15% (P = .80), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, MRD positivity and a disease status >CR1 at the time of HSCT were significantly associated with poorer outcomes (P < .05). In conclusion, our study supports that both haploidentical and cord blood transplantation show comparable outcomes in pediatric AML patients. We obtained comparable survival rates, although CBT showed a trend to lower rates of chronic GvHD and higher GFRFS, demonstrating that it should still be considered a valuable option, particularly for pediatric patients.

Sisinni L ，Monserrate GXA ，Hurtado JMP ，Panesso M ，Molina B ，Fuentes C ，Fuster JL ，Verdu-Amoros J ，Regueiro A ，Palomo P ，Beléndez C ，Pascual A ，Badell I ，Mozo Y ，Bueno D ，Pérez-Martínez A ，Fernández JM ，Vicent MG ，de Heredia CD ... -  《-》