Obstetrics-gynecology resident long-acting reversible contraception training: the role of resident and program characteristics.

Obstetrics-gynecology residents should graduate with competence in comprehensive contraceptive care, including long-acting reversible contraception. Lack of hands-on training and deficits in provider education are barriers to long-acting reversible contraception access. Identifying the number of long-acting reversible contraception insertions performed by obstetrics-gynecology residents could provide insight into the depth and breadth of long-acting reversible contraception training available to obstetrics-gynecology residents in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited residency programs. Our study investigates long-acting reversible contraception-specific training in obstetrics-gynecology residency programs across the United States, including the self-reported number of long-acting reversible contraception insertions per resident and the impact of resident demographic characteristics and residency program characteristics on training. Obstetrics-gynecology residents completed a voluntary electronic survey during the 2016 Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology examination. The survey included resident demographic characteristics and residency program characteristics as well as resident education and training in long-acting reversible contraception (number of intrauterine devices and implants inserted, training in immediate postpartum intrauterine device placement). A binary "long-acting reversible contraception insertion experience" variable dichotomized respondents as having a low level of long-acting reversible contraception insertions (0 implants and/or 10 or fewer intrauterine devices ) or a high level of long-acting reversible contraception insertions (1 or more implants and/or 11 or more intrauterine devices). χ2 tests were used to compare the presence of long-acting reversible contraception insertion experience by postgraduate year, resident demographic characteristics, and residency program characteristics. Adjusted logistic regression was performed to ascertain the independent effects of gender, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white vs other), residency program type (university vs community), and residency program geographic region on the likelihood of "low" overall long-acting reversible contraception insertion experience. In total, 5055 obstetrics-gynecology residents completed the survey (85%); analysis included only residents in United States obstetrics-gynecology programs (N=4322). Of the total analytic sample, 1777 (41.2%) had low long-acting reversible contraception insertion experience. As expected, the number of intrauterine device insertions, implant insertions, and overall long-acting reversible contraception experience increased as residents progressed through training. Long-acting reversible contraception insertion experience varied by residency program geographic region: 169 (27.1%) residents in programs in the West had low long-acting reversible contraception insertion experience compared with 498 (39.0%) in the South, 473 (45.3%) in the Midwest, and 615 (46.0%) in the Northeast. Only 152 (14.9%) of all postgraduate year 4 residents had low long-acting reversible contraception insertion experience. Among postgraduate year 4 residents, low long-acting reversible contraception insertion experience was significantly associated racial/ethnic minority status and community-based residency program type (compared with university-based). Postgraduate year 4 residents in programs located in the Northeast and Midwest had 4.25 (95% confidence interval, 2.04-8.85) and 2.75 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-5.97) times the odds of low long-acting reversible contraception experience compared with those in residency programs in the West, even after adjusting for other respondent characteristics and other residency program characteristics. Obstetrics-gynecology residents experience a range of long-acting reversible contraception training and insertions, which differed according to resident race/ethnicity and residency program characteristics (program type and geographic region). Residency programs with low long-acting reversible contraception training experience should consider opportunities to improve competence in this fundamental obstetrics-gynecology skill.

Maples JM ，Espey E ，Evans ML ，Breeze JL ，Ogburn T ，Zite NB ... -  《-》

Familiarity with Long-acting Reversible Contraceptives among Obstetrics and Gynecology, Family Medicine, and Pediatrics Residents: Results of a 2015 National Survey and Implications for Contraceptive Provision for Adolescents.

To assess familiarity with long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) among current obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), family medicine (FM), and pediatrics senior residents in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We selected 156 OB/GYN, FM, and pediatrics residency programs using the American Medical Association Freida database. Senior residents completed a survey addressing any training they had received on LARC, and rated their comfort level counseling about and inserting LARC. Residents rated their likelihood of recommending LARC to an adolescent, nulliparous patient, and indicated whether they would like additional training on LARC. Descriptive and analytic statistics were generated using R statistical software (The R Project for Statistical Computing; https://www.r-project.org). The survey was completed by 326 of 1,583 residents (20.6% response rate); at least 1 resident completed the survey at 105 (67.3%) of the residency programs contacted. Most programs (84.8%) provided some training on LARC. Residents in OB/GYN programs were comfortable counseling about and inserting contraceptive implants (97%, 83%), copper intrauterine devices (IUDs; 100%, 86%), and levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs (100%, 86%). In FM programs, fewer residents were comfortable counseling about and inserting contraceptive implants (71%, 47%), copper IUDs (68%, 21%), and LNG IUDs (79%, 18%). Residents in pediatrics programs had low comfort levels counseling about contraceptive implants (14%), copper IUDs (14%), and LNG IUDs (25%); no pediatrics residents were comfortable inserting LARC. OB/GYN residents were significantly more likely to recommend a LARC to an adolescent, nulliparous patient (P = .019). Most pediatric and FM residents desired additional training on LARC (82.7% and 60.7%, respectively). This study shows that knowledge gaps exist regarding LARC among FM and pediatrics residents.

Davis SA ，Braykov NP ，Lathrop E ，Haddad LB ... -  《-》

Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception by Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: An Examination of Access for All Women.

Evans ML ，Espey E ，Ogburn T ，Zite NB ... -  《-》

Family planning training at Catholic and other religious hospitals: a national survey.

Catholic and other faith-based hospitals often restrict family planning service provision based on institutional doctrine. Approximately 11% of US accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs occur at such hospitals, creating a challenge to educational leaders who must ensure comprehensive family planning training. To evaluate and summarize family planning training at obstetrics and gynecology residency programs that are affiliated with Catholic and other faith-based hospitals that restrict reproductive services. Using an online database search and survey screening questions, we identified 30 of 278 accredited 2017-2018 programs in which at least 70% of resident time is spent in faith-based hospitals that restrict family planning services; Jewish programs were excluded. We queried program leaders between March 2017 and April 2018 about education and training using an online or paper survey, and asked them to report on training settings, provision of family planning services in such settings, and to rate aspects of training as "poor," "adequate," or "strong." We compared responses at Catholic versus other faith-based programs using Fisher exact tests, χ2 analyses, and median tests. Among 30 programs, 25 responded (83%); the majority of respondents were program directors (88%) and represented Catholic hospitals (76%). All reported adequate contraceptive training, with 47% of Catholic programs relying on off-site locations. The majority of Catholic sites (84%) relied on off-site sterilization training sites. Survey respondents from Catholic programs most commonly endorsed concerns for inadequate training in postpartum tubal ligations (53% of Catholic respondents versus 0% of other faith-based program respondents, P = .05). Approximately one-half (56%) offered abortion training as part of the curriculum ("routine"), 32% offered residents the opportunity to arrange training ("elective"), and 12% did not offer; the majority (84%) relied on off-site collaborations. Catholic sites were more likely than other religious programs to report poor abortion training (47% versus 0%, P = .04). Five Catholic programs (26% of Catholic programs) reported that their residents did not meet the graduate training requirement for completion of 20 dilation and curettage procedures. One-third reported a prior Residency Review Committee family planning citation(s), and many commented that these citations helped provide leverage for improved training. Although Catholic and other restrictive, faith-based obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs have developed strategies in response to institutional restrictions, many report ongoing deficiencies, and almost one-half reported they were noncompliant with abortion training requirements. Programs with deficient trainings may benefit from strategic approaches, including enhanced onsite education and collaborations with off-site facilities.

Guiahi M ，Teal S ，Kenton K ，DeCesare J ，Steinauer J ... -  《-》

Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education.

Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) - the copper and levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the single-rod implant - are safe and effective but account for a small proportion of contraceptive use by US women. This study examined obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, training, practice and beliefs regarding LARC methods. A survey questionnaire was mailed to 3000 Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. After exclusions, 1221 eligible questionnaires were analyzed (45.8% response rate, accounting for exclusions). Almost all obstetrician-gynecologists reported providing IUDs (95.8%). Most obstetrician-gynecologists reported requiring two or more visits for IUD insertion (86.9%). Respondents that reported IUD insertion in a single visit reported inserting a greater number of IUDs in the last year. About half reported offering the single-rod implant (51.3%). A total of 92.0% reported residency training on IUDs, and 50.8% reported residency training on implants. Residency training and physician age correlated with the number of IUDs inserted in the past year. A total of 59.6% indicated receiving continuing education on at least one LARC method in the past 2years. Recent continuing education was most strongly associated with implant insertion, and 31.7% of respondents cited lack of insertion training as a barrier. Barriers to LARC provision could be reduced if more obstetrician-gynecologists received implant training and provided same-day IUD insertion. Continuing education will likely increase implant provision. This study shows that obstetrician-gynecologists generally offer IUDs, but fewer offer the single-rod contraceptive implant. Recent continuing education strongly predicted whether obstetrician-gynecologists inserted implants and was also associated with other practices that encourage LARC use.

Luchowski AT ，Anderson BL ，Power ML ，Raglan GB ，Espey E ，Schulkin J ... -  《-》