Clinical observation of crizotinib in the treatment of ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

ALK is a prognostic and predictive tumor marker in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and is more often found in lung adenocarcinomas. The clinical and pathological data of 87 patients confirmed to have NSCLC by pathology or cytology were selected from April 2014 to January 2017 at the Tumor Hospital of Hebei Province. Of the 87 ALK-positive-patients, 47 patients were treated with oral administration of crizotinib. The objective response rate (ORR) was 61.7%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 93.6%, and the mPFS was 19 months. In an analysis of the number of metastatic sites, the patients who had more than three metastatic sites, the ORR, DCR, and mPFS were 63.9%, 94.5%, and 19 months, compared with the 45.5%, 91%, and 11 months in the patients with less sites (P = 0.040). For patients of 60 years or older, ORR and DCR were 40% and 100%, the other group was 71.9% and 90.6%, respectively(P = 0.036). The timing of treatment was analyzed. At the first application of crizotinib, ORR and DCR were 78.2% and 100% corresponding 45.8% and 87.5% at the second and final application of crizotinib group (P = 0.022). Baseline brain metastases were present in 25.5% (12/47) of patients in this study. 9 of the patients who developed disease progression during crizotinib treatment had new brain metastases or increased preexisting cranial foci. Most of them took the treatment strategy of continuing crizotinib or replacing the second/third generation ALK-TKI treatment combined with local radiotherapy for brain metastases. The efficacy of crizotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC is related to the number of metastatic organs, age and timing of treatment. The use of crizotinib is prone to intracranial progression, and progression of simple brain metastases is not an indication that crizotinib is discontinued. Patients will continue to benefit from combination of local radiotherapy.

Deng H ，Li B ，Li L ，Peng J ，Lv T ，Liu Y ，Ding C ... -  《-》

Clinical factors affecting progression-free survival with crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Ock CY ，Yoo SH ，Keam B ，Kim M ，Kim TM ，Jeon YK ，Kim DW ，Chung DH ，Heo DS ... -  《-》

Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study.

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation inhibitor of ALK and ROS1 tyrosine kinases with broad coverage of ALK mutations. In a phase 1 study, activity was seen in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, most of whom had CNS metastases and progression after ALK-directed therapy. We aimed to analyse the overall and intracranial antitumour activity of lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In this phase 2 study, patients with histologically or cytologically ALK-positive or ROS1-positive, advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer, with or without CNS metastases, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2, and adequate end-organ function were eligible. Patients were enrolled into six different expansion cohorts (EXP1-6) on the basis of ALK and ROS1 status and previous therapy, and were given lorlatinib 100 mg orally once daily continuously in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall and intracranial tumour response by independent central review, assessed in pooled subgroups of ALK-positive patients. Analyses of activity and safety were based on the safety analysis set (ie, all patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib) as assessed by independent central review. Patients with measurable CNS metastases at baseline by independent central review were included in the intracranial activity analyses. In this report, we present lorlatinib activity data for the ALK-positive patients (EXP1-5 only), and safety data for all treated patients (EXP1-6). This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01970865. Between Sept 15, 2015, and Oct 3, 2016, 276 patients were enrolled: 30 who were ALK positive and treatment naive (EXP1); 59 who were ALK positive and received previous crizotinib without (n=27; EXP2) or with (n=32; EXP3A) previous chemotherapy; 28 who were ALK positive and received one previous non-crizotinib ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with or without chemotherapy (EXP3B); 112 who were ALK positive with two (n=66; EXP4) or three (n=46; EXP5) previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without chemotherapy; and 47 who were ROS1 positive with any previous treatment (EXP6). One patient in EXP4 died before receiving lorlatinib and was excluded from the safety analysis set. In treatment-naive patients (EXP1), an objective response was achieved in 27 (90·0%; 95% CI 73·5-97·9) of 30 patients. Three patients in EXP1 had measurable baseline CNS lesions per independent central review, and objective intracranial responses were observed in two (66·7%; 95% CI 9·4-99·2). In ALK-positive patients with at least one previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EXP2-5), objective responses were achieved in 93 (47·0%; 39·9-54·2) of 198 patients and objective intracranial response in those with measurable baseline CNS lesions in 51 (63·0%; 51·5-73·4) of 81 patients. Objective response was achieved in 41 (69·5%; 95% CI 56·1-80·8) of 59 patients who had only received previous crizotinib (EXP2-3A), nine (32·1%; 15·9-52·4) of 28 patients with one previous non-crizotinib ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EXP3B), and 43 (38·7%; 29·6-48·5) of 111 patients with two or more previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EXP4-5). Objective intracranial response was achieved in 20 (87·0%; 95% CI 66·4-97·2) of 23 patients with measurable baseline CNS lesions in EXP2-3A, five (55·6%; 21·2-86·3) of nine patients in EXP3B, and 26 (53·1%; 38·3-67·5) of 49 patients in EXP4-5. The most common treatment-related adverse events across all patients were hypercholesterolaemia (224 [81%] of 275 patients overall and 43 [16%] grade 3-4) and hypertriglyceridaemia (166 [60%] overall and 43 [16%] grade 3-4). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 (7%) of 275 patients and seven patients (3%) permanently discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Consistent with its broad ALK mutational coverage and CNS penetration, lorlatinib showed substantial overall and intracranial activity both in treatment-naive patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, and in those who had progressed on crizotinib, second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or after up to three previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Thus, lorlatinib could represent an effective treatment option for patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in first-line or subsequent therapy. Pfizer.

Solomon BJ ，Besse B ，Bauer TM ，Felip E ，Soo RA ，Camidge DR ，Chiari R ，Bearz A ，Lin CC ，Gadgeel SM ，Riely GJ ，Tan EH ，Seto T ，James LP ，Clancy JS ，Abbattista A ，Martini JF ，Chen J ，Peltz G ，Thurm H ，Ou SI ，Shaw AT ... -  《-》

Treatment Optimization for Brain Metastasis from Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Brain metastasis is common in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver gene mutations. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement is one of the common driver mutations in NSCLC. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been the research hotspot at present. However, there are relatively few studies specified on the treatment of brain metastasis from ALK gene rearrangement NSCLC. The prognosis of these patients, the role of ALK-TKI, and the proper combination model of ALK-TKI with radiotherapy are worth further exploring. This review focuses on new data on the prognosis of ALK-TKI and the proper combination model of ALK-TKI with radiotherapy. According to some retrospective trials, for ALKi-naïve ALK rearrangement NSCLC patients with brain metastasis, crizotinib together with radiotherapy seem to improve intracranial control rate, progression-free survival, and very likely improve overall survival; next-generation ALK-TKIs are now replacing crizotinib as first-line treatment. For patients with central nervous system progression during crizotinib application, combining radiotherapy could improve the local control rate while continuing crizotinib to control systemic disease. Second-/third-generation ALK inhibitors had higher intracranial ORR and DCR even after crizotinib-refractory situations, and they alone had a strong efficacy against intracranial tumors, in which situation radiotherapy might be omitted. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were both local treatment options for brain metastasis, and the preferred choice was hard to make. ALK resistance is complicated with a wide range of molecular changes, and future studies are needed to solve these problems. Anyway, further and larger prospective studied are worth exploring to offer a confirmed preferred choice of drugs and radiation. Key Messages: Next-generation ALK-TKIs are now replacing crizotinib as first-line treatment in ALKi-naïve ALK rearrangement NSCLC patients with brain metastasis, and they alone might have a strong efficacy against intracranial tumors in crizotinib-refractory situations in which occasion radiotherapy might be omitted. SRS and WBRT are both local treatment options for brain metastasis.

Wang W ，Sun X ，Hui Z 《-》

Optimal timing and clinical value of radiotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with or without baseline brain metastases: implications from pattern of failure analyses.

Ni J ，Li G ，Yang X ，Chu L ，Wang J ，Li Y ，Zou L ，Li Y ，Xie C ，Zhu Z ... -  《Radiation Oncology》