Gender Bias Experiences of Female Surgical Trainees.

Medical schools now average approximately 50% female students, yet a disproportionate number of women continue to choose nonsurgical over surgical specialties. Once in training, studies indicate that pervasive gender stereotypes, sexism and harassment negatively affect female surgeons. The aim of this study is to describe female surgeons' experiences with gender bias and microaggressions in the workplace during residency and fellowship training, and understand if differences exist in the experiences of trainees in male-dominant vs female-dominant surgical specialties. A mixed methods approach was used to explore the experiences of female surgical trainees. Participants were recruited from all surgical disciplines at an academic center. Initially, focus groups were used to explore themes that trainees face related to gender bias. A trained moderator conducted all focus groups, which were audio recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis of de-identified transcripts was performed to identify emerging themes. We then created an online survey using the validated 44-question Sexist Microaggression Experiences and Stress Scale to assess frequency and psychologic impact of these events with additional questions developed from the focus groups. The survey was sent to all female residents and fellows at one academic institution. University of New Mexico Hospital, a tertiary care academic medical center. Fifteen female surgical trainees participated in focus groups. Thirty-three female surgical trainees participated in the online survey. Two focus groups including 15 female trainees were conducted, revealing 4 themes: Exclusion, Adaptation, Increased effort, and Development of Resilience Strategies. All participants had experienced gender bias or discrimination during medical school or surgical training. The quantitative survey had a 66% response rate (33/50 female trainees). Significant differences were found in the experience of female trainees in male-dominant vs female-dominant specialties, with those in male-dominant fields often reporting more frequent, severe, and stressful microaggression experiences. When describing how gender bias would affect their future in medicine, trainees in male-dominant specialties were more likely to report that due to gender bias, they "may leave medicine/retire early" (33% vs 6%, p = 0.040) and that they "would not recommend my profession to trainees or family members" (40% vs 6%, p = 0.015)." Female surgical trainees continue to experience gender bias. A culture of sexism leads to physical and social adaptations to fit into the role of surgeon. Participants expressed significant effort to sustain this level of adaptation, leading to fatigue and creation of resilience mechanisms. The environment in which a trainee operates (male-dominant vs female-dominant) significantly impacts their experience. Those experiencing more bias were less likely to recommend their specialty and reported plans to leave medicine earlier. Culture change across institutions and system-level interventions are necessary to create meaningful and sustainable change that improves the experience of female surgical trainees.

Barnes KL ，McGuire L ，Dunivan G ，Sussman AL ，McKee R ... -  《-》

Behind the Mask: An Exploratory Assessment of Female Surgeons' Experiences of Gender Bias.

Barnes KL ，Dunivan G ，Sussman AL ，McGuire L ，McKee R ... -  《-》

Workplace microaggressions: results of a survey of the American College of Surgeons members.

Workplace microaggressions are a longstanding but understudied problem in the surgical specialties. Microaggressions in health care are linked to negative emotional and physical health outcomes and can contribute to burnout and suboptimal delivery of patient care. They also negatively impact recruitment, retention, and promotion, which often results in attrition. Further attrition at the time of an impending surgical workforce shortage risks compromising the delivery of health care to the diverse US population, and may jeopardize the financial stability of health care organizations. To date, studies on microaggressions have consisted of small focus groups comprising women faculty or trainees at a single institution. To our knowledge, there are no large, multiorganizational, gender-inclusive studies on microaggressions experienced by practicing surgeons. This study aimed to examine the demographic and occupational characteristics of surgeons who do and do not report experiencing workplace microaggressions and whether these experiences would influence a decision to pursue a career in surgery again. We developed and internally validated a web-based survey to assess surgeon experiences with microaggressions and the associated sequelae. The survey was distributed through a convenience sample of 9 American College of Surgeons online Communities from November 2022 to January 2023. All American College of Surgeons Communities comprised members who had completed residency or fellowship training and had experience in the surgical workforce. The survey contained demographic, occupational, and validated microaggression items. Analyses include descriptive and chi-square statistics, t tests, and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression. The survey was completed by 377 American College of Surgeons members with the following characteristics: working as a surgeon (80.9%), non-Hispanic White (71.8%), general surgeons (71.0%), aged ≥50 years (67.4%), fellowship-trained (61.0%), and women (58.4%). A total of 254 (67.4%) respondents reported experiencing microaggressions. Younger surgeons (P=.002), women (P<.001), and fellowship-trained surgeons (P=.001) were more likely to report experiencing microaggressions than their counterparts. Surgeons working in academic medical centers or health care systems with teaching responsibilities were more likely to experience microaggressions than those in private practice (P<.01). Surgeons currently working as a surgeon or those who are unable to work reported more experience with microaggressions (P=.003). There was no difference in microaggressions experienced among respondents based on surgical specialty, race/ethnicity, or whether the surgeons reported having a disability. In multivariable logistic regression, women had higher odds of experiencing microaggressions compared with men (adjusted odds ratio, 15.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.7-32.8), and surgeons in private practice had significantly lower odds of experiencing microaggressions compared with surgeons in academic medicine (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.8) or in health care systems with teaching responsibilities (adjusted odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.6). Among surgeons responding to an online survey, respondents reporting microaggressions were less likely to say that they would choose a career in surgery again (P<.001). Surgeons reporting experience with microaggressions represent a diverse range of surgical specialties and subspecialties. With the continued expansion of surgeon gender and race/ethnicity representation, deliberate efforts to address and eliminate workplace microaggressions could have broad implications for improving recruitment and retention of surgeons.

Heisler CA ，Godecker AL ，Verran D ，Sinha MS ，Byam J ，Miller P ... -  《-》

The Majority of Black Orthopaedic Surgeons Report Experiencing Racial Microaggressions During Their Residency Training.

Orthopaedic surgery is the least-diverse surgical specialty based on race and ethnicity. To our knowledge, the impact of this lack of diversity on discriminatory or noninclusive experiences perceived by Black orthopaedic surgeons during their residency training has never been evaluated. Racial microaggressions were first defined in the 1970s as "subtle verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults to the target person or group." Although the term "microaggression" has long been established, more recently, as more workplaces aim to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion, it has entered the medical profession's lexicon as a means of describing the spectrum of racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion in the healthcare environment. (1) What is the extent of discrimination that is perceived by Black orthopaedic surgeons during residency? (2) What subtypes of racial microaggressions (which encompasses racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion) do Black orthopaedic surgeons experience during residency training, and who are the most common initiators of these microaggressions? (3) What feedback statements could be perceived as racially biased to Black orthopaedic surgeons in residency training? (4) Are there gender differences in the reported types of racial microaggressions recalled by Black respondents during residency training? An anonymous survey was administered between July 1, 2020, and September 1, 2020, to practicing orthopaedic surgeons, residents, and fellows in the J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society database who self-identify as Black. There were 455 Black orthopaedic surgeons in practice and 140 Black orthopaedic residents or fellows in the database who met these criteria. Fifty-two percent (310 of 595) of participants responded. Fifty-three percent (243 of 455) were practicing surgeons and 48% (67 of 140) were current residents or fellows. Respondents reported their perception of discrimination in the residency workplace using a modified version of the single-item Perceived Occupational Discrimination Scale and were asked to recall any specific examples of experiences with racial discrimination, bias, or exclusion during their training. Examples were later categorized as different subtypes of racial microaggressions and were quantified through a descriptive analysis and compared by gender. Among survey respondents, 34% (106 of 310) perceived a lot of residency workplace discrimination, 44% (137 of 310) perceived some residency workplace discrimination, 18% (55 of 310) perceived a little residency workplace discrimination, and 4% (12 of 310) perceived no residency workplace discrimination. Categorized examples of racial microaggressions experienced in residency were commonly reported, including being confused for a nonphysician medical staff (nurse or physician's assistant) by 87% (271 of 310) of respondents or nonmedical staff (janitorial or dietary services) by 81% (250 of 310) of respondents. Racially explicit statements received during residency training were reported by 61% (190 of 310) of respondents. Thirty-eight percent (117 of 310) of such statements were reportedly made by patients and 18% (55 of 310) were reportedly made by attending faculty. Fifty percent (155 of 310) of respondents reported receiving at least one of nine potentially exclusionary or devaluing feedback statements during their residency training. Among those respondents, 87% (135 of 155) perceived at least one of the statements to be racially biased in its context. The three feedback statements that, when received, were most frequently perceived as racially biased in their context was that the respondent "matched at their program to fulfill a diversity quota" (94% [34 of 36]), the respondent was unfriendly compared with their peers (92% [24 of 26]), or that the respondent was "intimidating or makes those around him/her uncomfortable" (88% [51 of 58]). When compared by gender, Black women more frequently reported being mistaken for janitors and dietary services at 97% (63 of 65), compared with Black men at 77% (187 of 244; p < 0.01). In addition, Black women more frequently reported being mistaken as nurses or physician assistants (100% [65 of 65]) than Black men did (84% [205 of 244]) during orthopaedic residency training (p < 0.01). Black women also more frequently reported receiving potentially devaluing or exclusionary feedback statements during residency training. Perception of workplace discrimination during orthopaedic residency training is high (96%) among Black orthopaedic surgeons in the United States. Most respondents reported experiencing discrimination, bias, and exclusion that could be categorized as specific subtypes of racial microaggressions. Several different examples of racial microaggressions were more commonly reported by Black women. Certain feedback statements were frequently perceived as racially biased by recipients. To better understand barriers to the successful recruitment and retention of Black physicians in orthopaedics, the extent of racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion in residency training must be quantified. This study demonstrates that racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion during residency, wholly categorized as racial microaggressions, are frequently recalled by Black orthopaedic surgeons. A better understanding of the context of these experiences of Black trainees is a necessary starting point for the development of a more inclusive workplace training environment in orthopaedic surgery.

Brooks JT ，Porter SE ，Middleton KK ，Carson EW ，Ode GE ... -  《-》

Exploring female otolaryngologists' experiences with gender bias and microaggressions: a cross sectional Canadian survey.

Gender bias is behavior that shows favoritism towards one gender over another. Microaggressions are defined as subtle, often unconscious, discriminatory, or insulting actions that communicate demeaning or negative attitudes. Our objective was to explore how female otolaryngologists experience gender bias and microaggressions in the workplace. Anonymous web-based cross-sectional Canadian survey was distributed to all female otolaryngologists (attendings and trainees) using the Dillman's Tailored Design Method from July to August of 2021. Quantitative survey included demographic data, validated 44-item Sexist Microaggressions Experiences and Stress Scale (MESS) and validated 10-item General Self-efficacy scale (GSES). Statistical analysis included descriptive and bivariate analysis. Sixty out of 200 participants (30% response rate) completed the survey (mean age 37 ± 8.3 years, 55.0% white, 41.7% trainee, 50% fellowship-trained, 50% with children, mean 9.2 ± 7.4 years of practice). Participants scored mild to moderate on the Sexist MESS-Frequency (mean ± standard deviation) 55.8 ± 24.2 (42.3% ± 18.3%), Severity 46.0 ± 23.9 (34.8% ± 18.1%), Total 104.5 ± 43.7 (39.6% ± 16.6%) and high on GSES (32.7 ± 5.7). Sexist MESS score was not associated with age, ethnicity, fellowship-training, having children, years of practice, or GSES. In the sexual objectification domain, trainees had higher frequency (p = 0.04), severity (p = 0.02) and total MESS (p = 0.02) scores than attendings. This was the first multicenter, Canada-wide study exploring how female otolaryngologists experience gender bias and microaggressions in the workplace. Female otolaryngologists experience mild to moderate gender bias, but have high self-efficacy to manage this issue. Trainees had more severe and frequent microaggressions than attendings in the sexual objectification domain. Future efforts should help develop strategies for all otolaryngologists to manage these experiences, and thereby improve the culture of inclusiveness and diversity in our specialty.

Hu AC ，Nguyen K ，Meyer TK 《Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery》