Impact of the 2016 revision of US Pediatric Heart Allocation Policy on waitlist characteristics and outcomes.

US Pediatric Heart Allocation Policy was recently revised, deprioritizing candidates with cardiomyopathy while maintaining status 1A eligibility for congenital heart disease (CHD) candidates on "high-dose" inotropes. We compared waitlist characteristics and mortality around this change. Status 1A listings decreased (70% to 56%, P < .001) and CHD representation increased among status 1A listings (48% vs 64%, P < .001). Waitlist mortality overall (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.96, P = .63) and among status 1A candidates (SHR 1.16, P = .14) were unchanged. CHD waitlist mortality trended better (SHR 0.82, P = .06) but was unchanged for CHD candidates listed status 1A (SHR 0.92, P = .47). Status 1A listing exceptions increased 2- to 3-fold among hypertrophic and restrictive cardiomyopathy candidates and 13.5-fold among dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) candidates. Hypertrophic (SHR 6.25, P = .004) and restrictive (SHR 3.87, P = .03) cardiomyopathy candidates without status 1A exception had increased waitlist mortality, but those with DCM did not (SHR 1.26, P = .32). Ventricular assist device (VAD) use increased only among DCM candidates ≥1 years old (26% vs 38%, P < .001). Current allocation policy has increased CHD status 1A representation but has not improved their waitlist mortality. Excessive DCM status 1A listing exceptions and continued status 1A prioritization of children on stable VADs potentially diminish the intended benefits of policy revision.

Magnetta DA ，Godown J ，West S ，Zinn M ，Rose-Felker K ，Miller S ，Feingold B ... -  《-》

Urgent listing exceptions and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation: Comparison to standard criteria patients.

United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy enables listing exceptions to avoid penalizing patients with waitlist mortality not captured by standard criteria. Outcomes among patients listed by exception have not been analyzed. We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric (≤17 years of age, n = 4,706) listings (2006 to 2015) for primary, isolated heart transplantation within the UNOS data set, assessing Status 1A exception (n = 211, 4.5%) use across regions and patient characteristics and evaluating waitlist outcomes compared with candidates listed using standard criteria. Death or removal for reason other than transplant did not differ between exception and standard criteria patients at 1 month (11.7% vs 16.2%, p = not statistically significant [NS]), 2 months (18.2% vs 29.0%, p = 0.11) or overall (16.1% vs 22.0%, p = NS) on the waitlist. Rates were higher than among Status 1B patients (1 month: 2.8%; 2 months: 5.6%; overall: 14.9%; p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of competing risks (transplantation, death/removal for reasons other than transplant and removal) did not differ when comparing Status 1A exception patients with Status 1A standard criteria patients. Use of 1A exceptions varied across UNOS regions (1.9% to 22.3%, p < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted modeling identified patients more (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: odds ratio [OR] = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.0; restrictive cardiomyopathy: OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.3) and less (low socioeconomic status: OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.0) likely to use an exception. Use of exceptions was uncorrelated with regional outcomes. Waitlist mortality among Status 1A exception patients is similar to that among those listed by standard criteria. However, variation in exception use across geography and demography may contribute to inequities in access to transplantation, particularly for those with low socioeconomic status. Standardization of practices may decrease regional variation and minimize inequities.

Davies RR ，McCulloch MA ，Haldeman S ，Gidding SS ，Pizarro C ... -  《-》

Regional differences in recipient waitlist time and pre- and post-transplant mortality after the 2006 United Network for Organ Sharing policy changes in the donor heart allocation algorithm.

This study examined the impact of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy changes for regional differences in waitlist time and mortality before and after heart transplantation. The 2006 UNOS thoracic organ allocation policy change was implemented to allow for greater regional sharing of organs for heart transplantation. We analyzed 36,789 patients who were listed for heart transplantation from January 1999 through April 2012. These patients were separated into 2 eras centered on the July 12, 2006 UNOS policy change. Pre- and post-transplantation characteristics were compared by UNOS regions. Waitlist mortality decreased nationally (up to 180 days: 13.3% vs. 7.9% after the UNOS policy change, p < 0.001) and within each region. Similarly, 2-year post-transplant mortality decreased nationally (2-year mortality: 17.3% vs. 14.6%; p < 0.001) as well as regionally. Waitlist time for UNOS status 1A and 1B candidates increased nationally 17.8 days on average (p < 0.001) with variability between the regions. The greatest increases were in Region 9 (59.2-day increase, p < 0.001) and Region 4 (41.2-day increase, p < 0.001). Although the use of mechanical circulatory support increased nearly 2.3-fold nationally in Era 2, significant differences were present on a regional basis. In Regions 6, 7, and 10, nearly 40% of those transplanted required left ventricular assist device bridging, whereas only 19.6%, 22.3%, and 15.5% required a left ventricular assist device in regions 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The 2006 UNOS policy change has resulted in significant regional heterogeneity with respect to waitlist time and reliance on mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, although overall both waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival are improved.

Schulze PC ，Kitada S ，Clerkin K ，Jin Z ，Mancini DM ... -  《-》

Waitlist Outcomes for Pediatric Heart Transplantation in the Current Era: An Analysis of the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database.

Butts RJ ，Toombs L ，Kirklin JK ，Schumacher KR ，Conway J ，West SC ，Auerbach S ，Bansal N ，Zhao H ，Cantor RS ，Nandi D ，Peng DM ... -  《-》

Organ allocation in adults with congenital heart disease listed for heart transplant: impact of ventricular assist devices.

Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) listed for heart transplantation are rarely supported by ventricular assist devices (VADs). This may be a disadvantage to their priority for organ allocation. We sought to determine the relationship between VAD implantation and successful transplantation among patients listed for heart transplant. Adults with CHD patients (N = 1,250) were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 1985 to 2010 and compared to patients without congenital etiology for heart failure (N = 59,606). VAD use at listing, listing status, status upgrades and reasons for upgrade prior to transplant were trended at 5-year intervals and appropriate statistical comparisons were made between groups. Since 1985, VAD use prior to transplant has increased significantly in patients without CHD, but not in CHD patients (17% vs 3% in 2006 to 2010, p < 0.0001). CHD patients were more likely to be listed as Status 2, compared to those without (66% vs 40%, p < 0.001 for 2006 to 2010), and less likely to be upgraded to Status 1 after listing (43% vs 55%, p = 0.03). Among those upgraded to Status 1, CHD patients were less likely to have a VAD at transplant than those without (3% vs 18%, p = 0.005). VAD use was more likely to result in death in CHD patients. VAD use is less common in CHD patients than in patients without CHD, both at the time of listing and transplantation. Reduced VAD use appears to contribute to lower listing status and organ allocation. These differences have grown more disparate over time. Separate criteria for organ allocation for CHD patients may be justified.

Gelow JM ，Song HK ，Weiss JB ，Mudd JO ，Broberg CS ... -  《-》