Laparoscopic Reverse Technique for Posterior Rectovaginal Deep Endometriosis Nodule Step by Step.

To demonstrate the application of the so-called reverse technique to approach deep infiltrating endometriosis nodules affecting the retrocervical area, the posterior vaginal fornix, and the anterior rectal wall. In Video 1, the authors describe the complete procedure in 10 steps in order to standardize it and facilitate the comprehension and the reproduction of such a procedure in a simple and safe way. A case report. A private hospital in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. A 32-year-old woman was referred to our service complaining about cyclic dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and cyclic dyschezia. Transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation showed a 2.4-cm endometriotic nodule at the retrocervical area, uterosacral ligaments, posterior vaginal fornix, and anterior rectal wall, infiltrating up to the muscularis 10 cm far from the anal verge. Not applicable. Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the dorsal decubitus position with her arms alongside her body and her lower limbs in abduction. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved using a Veress needle placed at the umbilicus. Four trocars were placed according to the French technique as follows: a 10-mm trocar at the umbilicus for the 0 degree laparoscope; a 5-mm trocar at the right anterosuperior iliac spine; a 5-mm trocar in the midline between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis, approximately 8 to 10 cm inferior to the umbilical trocar; and a 5-mm trocar at the left anterosuperior iliac spine. The entire pelvis was inspected for endometriotic lesions (step 1). The implants located at the ovarian fossae were completely removed (step 2). The ureters were identified bilaterally, and both pararectal fossae were dissected, preserving the hypogastric nerves (step 3). The lesion was separated from the retrocervical area, and the posterior vaginal fornix was resected (reverse technique), leaving the disease attached to the anterior surface of the rectum (step 4). The lesion was shaved off the anterior rectal wall using a harmonic scalpel (step 5). The anterior rectal wall was closed using X-shaped stitches of 3-0 polydioxanone suture in 2 layers (step 6). The specimen was extracted through the vagina (step 7). The posterior vaginal fornix was reattached to the retrocervical area using X-shaped sutures of 0 poliglecaprone 25 (step 8). A pneumatic test was performed to check the integrity of the suture (step 9). At the end of the procedure, hemostasis was controlled, and the abdominal cavity was irrigated using Lactate ringer solution (step10). The laparoscopic reverse technique is an alternative approach to face retrocervical or rectovaginal nodules infiltrating the anterior rectal wall. In this technique, the separation of the nodule from the rectal wall is performed at the end of the surgery and not at the beginning as performed within the traditional technique. This enables the surgeon to perform a more precise dissection of the endometriotic nodule from the rectal wall because of the increased mobility of the bowel. The wider range of movements serves as an ergonomic advantage for the subsequent dissection of the lesion from the rectum, allowing the surgeon to decide the best technique to apply for the treatment of the bowel disease (rectal shaving or discoid or segmental resection).

Cabrera R ，Tessmann Zomer M ，Larrain D ，Bourdel N ，Canis M ，Kondo W ... -  《-》

Laparoscopic Double Discoid Resection With a Circular Stapler for Bowel Endometriosis.

To demonstrate the technique of laparoscopic double discoid resection with a circular stapler for bowel endometriosis. Case report (Canadian Task Force classification III). Private hospital in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. A 33-year-old woman was referred to our service complaining about cyclic dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and cyclic dyschezia. Transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation showed a 6-cm endometriotic nodule at the retrocervical area, uterosacral ligaments, posterior vaginal fornix, and anterior rectal wall, infiltrating up to the submucosa, 5 cm far from the anal verge. Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the dorsal decubitus position with her arms alongside her body and her lower limbs in abduction. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved using a Veres needle placed at the umbilicus. Four trocars were placed: a 10-mm trocar at the umbilicus for the zero-degree laparoscope; a 5-mm trocar at the right anterosuperior iliac spine; a 5-mm trocar in the midline between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis, approximately 8 to 10 cm inferior to the umbilical trocar; and a 5-mm trocar at the left anterosuperior iliac spine. The entire pelvis was inspected for endometriotic lesions, and all implants in the anterior compartment of the pelvis were resected. The lesions located at the ovarian fossae were completely removed. The ureters were identified bilaterally, and both para-rectal fossae were dissected. The right hypogastric nerve was released from the disease laterally. The lesion was separated from the retrocervical area, and the posterior vaginal fornix was resected (reverse technique), leaving the disease attached to the anterior surface of the rectum. The lesion was shaved off the anterior rectal wall using a harmonic scalpel. A x-shaped stitch was placed at the anterior rectal wall using 2-0 mononylon suture. A 33-mm circular stapler was placed transanally under laparoscopic control, and once it reached the area to be resected, it was opened. A gap was created between the envil and the stapler. The anterior rectal wall was placed inside this gap with the aid of the stitch at the anterior rectal wall. The stapler was fired, and a piece of the anterior rectal wall was resected. The same procedure was performed using a 29-mm circular stapler, which allowed for the complete removal of the lesion. We usually perform the second discoid resection using a 29-mm circular stapler to allow an easy progression of the stapler through the rectum beyond the first stapler line, so not to put too much pressure on it. In our experience, the first discoid resection removes most of the disease, and the second discoid resection is only needed to remove a small amount of residual disease, along with the first staple line. The procedure took 177 min, and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The patient started clear liquids 6 hours after the procedure, and was discharged 19 hours after that [1]. Pathological examination of the 2 strips of the anterior rectal wall revealed infiltration of the bowel wall by endometriotic tissue. She had an uneventful postoperative course, and was able to re-start sexual intercourse 50 days after surgery. Between January 2010 and January 2015, 315 women underwent laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of bowel endometriosis in our service. Among them, 16 (5.1%) were operated on by using the double discoid resection technique. Median age of the patients was 34 years, and median body mass index was 25.9 kg/m(2). Median preoperative cancer antigen-125 level was 26.5 U/mL (normal value is <35 U/mL). Median size of the rectosigmoid nodule was 35 mm (range: 30-60), and median distance from the anal verge was 10.5 cm (range: 5-15 cm). Median surgical time was 160 min (range: 54-210 min). Concomitant procedures included hysterectyomy (n = 5), partial cystectomy (n = 3), resection of the posterior vaginal fornix (n = 4), and appendectomy (n = 1). Median estimated intraoperative bleeding was 32.5 mL (range: 30-100), and median time of hospitalization was 19 hours (range: 10-41). Median American Fertility Society score was 46 (10-102). Two minor complications (12.5%) occurred in this initial series: 1 patient required bladder catheterization for urinary retention; and 1 patient developed a urinary tract infection that required oral antibiotic treatment. One major complication (6.2%) was observed; the patient developed fever and abdominal pain on the fourth postoperative day. She was re-operated, and the intraoperative diagnosis was pelviperitonitis. The abdominal cavity was inspected for any dehiscence of the bowel and then washed. She was discharged on the second day after re-operation with oral antibiotic therapy. In our daily practice, we are used to discharging our patients soon in the postoperative setting (19 hours for rectal shaving or discoid resection and 28 hours for segmental bowel resection) [1] because the rate of postoperative fistula seems to be low [2]. Because we still have not seen any fistulas after conservative surgery (rectal shaving, discoid resection, and double discoid resection), we usually prefer to perform this type of surgery compared with segmental bowel resection, when possible. Laparoscopic double discoid resection with circular stapler may be an alternative to segmental bowel resection in selected patients with bowel endometriosis.

Kondo W ，Ribeiro R ，Zomer MT ，Hayashi R ... -  《-》

Rectovaginal Splenosis: An Unexpected Cause of Dyspareunia Approached by Laparoscopy.

To demonstrate the technique of laparoscopic approach in a rare case of rectovaginal splenosis with severe dyspareunia and dyschesia. A step-by-step explanation of the patient's condition, diagnosis, surgical technique, and postoperative results (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Splenosis consists of ectopic functioning splenic tissue that can be located anywhere within the abdomen or pelvis. Fragments are often multiple and range in diameter from a few millimeters to a few centimeters. They are reddish-blue and are sessile or pedunculated. Their appearance can mimic that of neoplasms or endometriosis, which are the main differential diagnoses. Trauma and subsequent splenectomy is the cause in most cases. Splenosis is a benign condition usually found incidentally and is usually asymptomatic. The need for therapy is controversial, and treatment is suggested only in symptomatic cases, primarily those related to pelvic or abdominal lesions, as in our patient. The diagnosis of splenosis in a woman complaining of pelvic pain may present diagnostic difficulties. The splenic tissue has the macroscopic appearance of endometriosis, and its position in the pelvis also may suggest this diagnosis. Where excision of splenosis is considered necessary, the approach should be laparoscopic, unless this is considered too risky owing to the proximity of vital structures. A 40-year-old woman was referred to our department for severe dyspareunia and dyschezia. The gynecologic examination revealed a painfull nodularity on the posterior vaginal cul de sac. Further evaluation with 2- and 3-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed several soft tissue nodules in the pouch of Douglas (POD), which were enhanced on contrast administration. She had undergone a splenectomy 15 years earlier after a car accident. A laparoscopic approach to a rectovaginal nodularity was performed. Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the dorsal decubitus position with her arms alongside her body and her legs in abduction. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved using a Veres needle placed at the umbilicus. Four trocars were placed: a 10-mm trocar at the umbilicus for the 0-degree laparoscope; a 5-mm trocar at the right anterosuperior iliac spine; a 5-mm trocar in the midline between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis, approximately 8 to 10 cm inferior to the umbilical trocar; and a 5-mm trocar at the left anterosuperior iliac spine. The entire pelvis was inspected for endometriotic lesions. In the pelvis, hypervascular and bluish nodules were visible with extension from the POD into the deep rectovaginal space. The macroscopic appearance was atypical for endometriotic implants. The nodularities were carefully dissected and excised, and histological assessment revealed splenic tissue. At the time of this report, the patient had been asymptomatic for 6 months after surgery. Rectovaginal splenosis may mimic endometriosis. The laparoscopic approach to rectovaginal splenosis avoids an abdominal incision, with its associated pain and possible adhesion formation. It also provides a better view for dissection. In this patient, the splenosis was removed by laparoscopy, with no postoperative dyspareunia or dyschesia.

Ferreira H ，Maciel C ，Morgado A ，Pereira A ... -  《-》

Peritoneal Retraction Pocket Defects and Their Important Relationship with Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis.

The objective of this video is to demonstrate different clinical presentations of peritoneal defects (peritoneal retraction pockets) and their anatomic relationships with the pelvic innervation, justifying the occurrence of some neurologic symptoms in association with these diseases. Surgical demonstration of complete excision of different types of peritoneal retraction pockets and a comparison with a laparoscopic retroperitoneal cadaveric dissection of the pelvic innervation. Private hospital in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. A pelvic peritoneal pocket is a retraction defect in the surface of the peritoneum of variable size and shapes [1]. The origin of defects in the pelvic peritoneum is still unknown [2]. It has been postulated that it is the result of peritoneal irritation or invasion by endometriosis, with resultant scarring and retraction of the peritoneum [3,4]. It has also been suggested that a retraction pocket may be a cause of endometriosis, where the disease presumably settles in a previously altered peritoneal surface [5]. These defects are shown in many studies to be associated with pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and secondary dysmenorrhea [1-4]. Some studies have shown that the excision of these peritoneal defect improves pain symptoms and quality of life [5]. It is important to recognize peritoneal pockets as a potential manifestation of endometriosis because in some cases, the only evidence of endometriosis may be the presence of these peritoneal defects [6]. In this video, we demonstrate different types of peritoneal pockets and their close relationship with pelvic anatomic structures. Case 1 is a 29-year-old woman, gravida 0, with severe dysmenorrhea and catamenial bowel symptoms (bowel distension and diarrhea/constipation) that were unresponsive to medical treatment. Imaging studies were reported as normal, and a laparoscopy showed a posterior cul-de-sac peritoneal pocket infiltrating the pararectal fossa, with extension to the lateral border of the rectum. Case 2 is a cadaveric dissection of a posterior cul-de-sac peritoneal pocket infiltrating the pararectal fossa, with extension to the pelvic sidewall. After dissection of the obturator fossa, we can observe that the pocket is close to the sacrospinous ligament, pudendal nerve, and some sacral roots. Case 3 is a 31-year-old woman, gravida 1, para 1, with severe dysmenorrhea that was unresponsive to medical treatment and catamenial bowel symptoms (catamenial bowel distention and diarrhea). Imaging studies were reported as normal and a laparoscopy showed left uterosacral peritoneal pocket infiltrating the pararectal fossa in close proximity to the rectal wall. Case 4 is a cadaveric dissection of the ovarian fossa and the obturator fossa showing the proximity between these structures. Case 5 is a 35-year-old woman, gravida 0, with severe dysmenorrhea that was unresponsive to medical treatment, referring difficulty, and pain when walking only during menstruation. A neurologic physical examination revealed weakness in thigh adduction, and the magnetic resonance imaging showed no signs of endometriosis. During laparoscopy, we found a peritoneal pocket infiltrating the ovarian fossa, with involvement in the area between the umbilical ligament and the uterine artery. This type of pocket can easily reach the obturator nerve. Because the obturator nerve and its branches supply the muscle and skin of the medial thigh [7,8], patients may present with thigh adduction weakness or difficulty ambulating [9,10]. Case 6 is a cadaveric dissection of the sacrospinous ligament and the pudendal nerve from a medial approach, between the umbilical artery and the iliac vessels. Case 7 is a 34-year-old woman, gravida 1, para 1, with severe dysmenorrhea and catamenial bowel symptoms as well as deep dyspareunia. The transvaginal ultrasound showed focal adenomyosis and a 2-cm nodule, 9-cm apart from the anal verge, affecting 30% of the bowel circumference. In the laparoscopy, we found a posterior cul-de-sac retraction pocket associated with a large deep endometriosis nodule affecting the vagina and the rectum. In all cases, endometriosis was confirmed by histopathology, and in a 6-month follow-up, all patients showed improvement of bowel, pain, and neurologic symptoms. Peritoneal pockets can have different clinical presentations. Depending on the topography and deepness of infiltration, they can be the cause of some neurologic symptoms associated with endometriosis pain. With this video, we try to encourage surgeons to totally excise these lesions and raise awareness about the adjacent key anatomic structures that can be affected.

Carranco RC ，Zomer MT ，Berg CF ，Smith AV ，Koninckx P ，Kondo W ... -  《-》

Laparoscopic Technique for Discoid Resection of Rectal Endometriotic Nodules.

To show the surgical steps used to perform a rectal disc excision in the context of deep infiltrating endometriosis characterized by contiguity between an intestinal lesion and the retrocervical region. Step-by-step video demonstration of the technique. Although surgical options for the management of rectosigmoid endometriosis have been investigated increasingly, there is no consensus regarding patient eligibility for shaving, discoid resection, or segmental resection. In our practice, women with nodules ≤3 cm in size and >7 mm deep were considered as candidates for rectosigmoid disc excision [1]. Therefore patients' selection, together with the adoption of a standardized surgical technique, has allowed us to maximize the chance of a successful discoid resection, minimizing the complications potentially derivable from this surgical procedure. The patient was a 30-year-old woman with a history of constipation, dyschezia, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain unresponsive to hormonal therapies. A preoperative ultrasonography showed complete obliteration of the pouch of Douglas owing to a rectal endometriotic nodule (21 × 7 × 12 mm) in contiguity with a deeply infiltrating retrocervical lesion (28 × 10 × 27 mm). As a result, the rectal nodule infiltrated the tunica muscularis with a distance from the anal verge of 9 cm and an estimated stenosis of 35%. A 3-dimensional laparoscopy was performed. After rectal mobilization and rectovaginal space opening, the intestinal nodule was isolated in its entire circumference (Fig. 1). A 33-mm transanal circular stapler was inserted into the rectum through the anus and used to perform disc excision and suture the rectal wall. The overall operative time was 55 minutes. No intraoperative complication occurred. A complete excision of endometriosis was achieved. The estimated blood loss was 10 mL. An intra-abdominal drain was not placed, and the urinary catheter was removed at the end of the surgery. The patient was discharged 3 days after surgery and did not experience postoperative complications. The diameters of the bowel endometriotic nodule, on measuring fresh specimen, were 20 × 7 × 13 mm. Advanced laparoscopic surgical skills are needed to perform an effective and safe rectal discoid resection. Subspecialization and an adequate preoperative evaluation are of utmost importance to appropriately plan the treatment strategy against bowel endometriosis.

Malzoni M ，Coppola M ，Rasile M ，Luzzolino D ，Casarella L ，Di Giovanni A ，Falcone F ... -  《-》