Comparative efficacy and safety of immunotherapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
摘要:
Two PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and one PD-L1(atezolizumab) inhibitors are approved for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer but have not been compared in head-to-head trials. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy/safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In five-trials (including long-term updates) with docetaxel as common comparator there were no differences in OS and PFS between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Pembrolizumab (odds ratio(OR) = 2.22, 95%CrI = 1.28-3.70) and nivolumab (OR = 1.92, 95%CrI = 1.15-3.23) had higher ORRs than atezolizumab and at PD-L1 expression ≥50% and ≥1%. Probabilistically, pembrolizumab ranked first in OS and ORR, and in OS sub-analyses for adenocarcinoma, EGFR-mutant, ECOG-score-1, male, and age <65 years. Nivolumab ranked first in PFS, and in OS sub-analyses for squamous-cell disease, EGFR-wild-type, and ECOG-score-0. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab ranked the best option for most of adverse events. While pembrolizumab and nivolumab prevailed in rank in OS and ORR benefit, patient characteristics, safety and tolerance should be considered in treatment decision-making.
收起
展开
DOI:
10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.004
被引量:
年份:
1970


通过 文献互助 平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
求助方法1:
知识发现用户
每天可免费求助50篇
求助方法1:
关注微信公众号
每天可免费求助2篇
求助方法2:
完成求助需要支付5财富值
您目前有 1000 财富值
相似文献(996)
参考文献(0)
引证文献(24)
来源期刊
影响因子:暂无数据
JCR分区: 暂无
中科院分区:暂无