Efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy after radiologic progression on targeted therapy in stage IV melanoma.

Targeted therapy (TT) is an effective treatment for advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma, but most patients eventually acquire resistance and progress. Here, we evaluated the outcome of second-line immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) after progression on dual BRAF and MEK inhibition. Patients with metastatic melanoma progressing on combined BRAF + MEK inhibition and receiving second-line ICB between 2015 and 2019 in 9 tertiary referral centres were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data and blood counts of all patients were collected retrospectively. We identified 99 patients with stage IV melanoma receiving ICB (nivolumab, pembrolizumab [n = 39] or ipilimumab plus nivolumab [n = 60]) after progression on combined TT. The median progression-free survival was similar in the PD-1 and ipilimumab plus nivolumab group (2.6 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.0-3.1] vs. 2.0 [95% CI, 1.4-2.6], p = 0.15). The objective response rate was 18.0% in the PD-1 and 15.0% in the ipilimumab plus nivolumab group (p = 0.70). The disease control rate was 25.7% for monotherapy and 18.3% for combined ICB (p = 0.39). The median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.1-11.7) for patients receiving PD-1 monotherapy and 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.2-9.1) for patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab (p = 0.86). The latter was associated with a higher rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). No significant association of laboratory values or clinicopathological characteristics with response to second-line ICB was observed. PD-1 monotherapy and combined ipilimumab plus nivolumab show similar activity and outcome in patients with melanoma resistant to BRAF + MEK inhibition. However, combined ipilimumab plus nivolumab was associated with a higher rate of treatment-related AEs compared with monotherapy.

Kreft S ，Gesierich A ，Eigentler T ，Franklin C ，Valpione S ，Ugurel S ，Utikal J ，Haferkamp S ，Blank C ，Larkin J ，Garbe C ，Schadendorf D ，Lorigan P ，Schilling B ... -  《-》

MAPKinase inhibition after failure of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced melanoma - An evaluation of the multicenter prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG.

Forty to sixty percent of patients with advanced melanoma show primary resistance to PD-1-based immunotherapy, 30-40% of initial responders also progress. Here, we evaluated the outcome of second-line targeted therapy (TT) after progression on PD-1-based immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in BRAFV600-mutated melanoma. In addition, we report data on the activity of re-exposure with PD-1-based regimes. Patients with advanced (non-resectable stage III or IV, AJCC 2017, 8th edition) melanoma progressing on PD-1-based ICI (nivolumab, pembrolizumab or ipilimumab plus nivolumab) and receiving second-line BRAF plus MEK inhibition were identified from the prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOREG. We identified 108 patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma progressing on first-line ICI (nivolumab, pembrolizumab or ipilimumab plus nivolumab) and receiving second-line combined BRAF/MEK inhibition. Seventy-three percent of the cohort presented with primary PD-1 resistant disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) on ICI was 2.6 (95% CI 2.2-2.9) months. Median PFS on subsequent TT was 6.6 (95% CI 5.4-7.8) months. Median OS from start of second-line TT was 16.0 (95% CI 11.2-20.8) months. The 3-year PFS and OS rates on second-line TT were 16% and 30%. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) to TT were 42.6% and 55.6%. In patients with brain metastases, the ORR and DCR were 31.4% and 43.1%. Patients without brain metastases showed an ORR and DCR of 52.6% and 66.7%, respectively. Response to first-line ICI was associated with a numerically higher ORR and DCR to second-line TT and improved OS on TT. Twenty-three patients received third-line ICI of whom two patients showed an objective response. BRAF plus MEK inhibition shows meaningful activity and outcome in patients with advanced melanoma resistant to anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy. Rates of long-term benefit and survival in our study were similar to those reported for treatment-naïve patients receiving first-line MAPKi.

Kreft S ，Glutsch V ，Zaremba A ，Schummer P ，Mohr P ，Grimmelmann I ，Gutzmer R ，Meier F ，Pföhler C ，Sachse MM ，Meiss F ，Forschner A ，Haferkamp S ，Welzel J ，Terheyden P ，Herbst R ，Utikal J ，Kaatz M ，Weishaupt C ，Kreuter A ，Debus D ，Duecker P ，Sindrilaru A ，Löffler H ，Schley G ，Weichenthal M ，Schadendorf D ，Ugurel S ，Gesierich A ，Schilling B ... -  《-》

Ipilimumab alone or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.

Anti-PD-1 therapy (hereafter referred to as anti-PD-1) induces long-term disease control in approximately 30% of patients with metastatic melanoma; however, two-thirds of patients are resistant and will require further treatment. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) compared with ipilimumab monotherapy in patients who are resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (hereafter referred to as anti-PD-[L]1). This multicentre, retrospective, cohort study, was done at 15 melanoma centres in Australia, Europe, and the USA. We included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with metastatic melanoma (unresectable stage III and IV), who were resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 (innate or acquired resistance) and who then received either ipilimumab monotherapy or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), based on availability of therapies or clinical factors determined by the physician, or both. Tumour response was assessed as per standard of care (CT or PET-CT scans every 3 months). The study endpoints were objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety of ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1. We included 355 patients with metastatic melanoma, resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab), who had been treated with ipilimumab monotherapy (n=162 [46%]) or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (n=193 [54%]) between Feb 1, 2011, and Feb 6, 2020. At a median follow-up of 22·1 months (IQR 9·5-30·9), the objective response rate was higher with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (60 [31%] of 193 patients) than with ipilimumab monotherapy (21 [13%] of 162 patients; p<0·0001). Overall survival was longer in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group (median overall survival 20·4 months [95% CI 12·7-34·8]) than with ipilimumab monotherapy (8·8 months [6·1-11·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·50, 95% CI 0·38-0·66; p<0·0001). Progression-free survival was also longer with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (median 3·0 months [95% CI 2·6-3·6]) than with ipilimumab (2·6 months [2·4-2·9]; HR 0·69, 95% CI 0·55-0·87; p=0·0019). Similar proportions of patients reported grade 3-5 adverse events in both groups (59 [31%] of 193 patients in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group vs 54 [33%] of 162 patients in the ipilimumab group). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were diarrhoea or colitis (23 [12%] of 193 patients in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group vs 33 [20%] of 162 patients in the ipilimumab group) and increased alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (24 [12%] vs 15 [9%]). One death occurred with ipilimumab 26 days after the last treatment: a colon perforation due to immune-related pancolitis. In patients who are resistant to anti-PD-(L)1, ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 seemed to yield higher efficacy than ipilimumab with a higher objective response rate, longer progression-free, and longer overall survival, with a similar rate of grade 3-5 toxicity. Ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 should be favoured over ipilimumab alone as a second-line immunotherapy for these patients with advanced melanoma. None.

Pires da Silva I ，Ahmed T ，Reijers ILM ，Weppler AM ，Betof Warner A ，Patrinely JR ，Serra-Bellver P ，Allayous C ，Mangana J ，Nguyen K ，Zimmer L ，Trojaniello C ，Stout D ，Lyle M ，Klein O ，Gerard CL ，Michielin O ，Haydon A ，Ascierto PA ，Carlino MS ，Lebbe C ，Lorigan P ，Johnson DB ，Sandhu S ，Lo SN ，Blank CU ，Menzies AM ，Long GV ... -  《-》

Cautious addition of targeted therapy to PD-1 inhibitors after initial progression of BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma on checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Virtually all metastatic patients with metastatic melanoma who progress after initial treatment with PD-1 or CTLA-4 directed antibodies will die of their disease. Salvage options are urgently needed. It is theoretically attractive to combine immunotherapy with targeted agents in progressing patients with BRAF mutation positive melanoma, but the toxicity of combined treatment has proven challenging. We performed a retrospective analysis of our patient database and identified 23 patients who progressed on initial checkpoint inhibitor treatment, who subsequently had cautious addition of BRAF±MEK inhibitor therapy to continued PD-1 antibody treatment. We found an objective response rate of 55% in second line therapy, with a median progression-free survival of 33.4 months and median overall survival of 34.1 months, with 40% of patients in unmaintained remission at over 3 years. Ten of 12 responding patients were able to discontinue all therapy and continue in unmaintained remission. Toxicity of this approach was generally manageable (21.7% grade 3-5 toxicity). There was 1 early sudden death for unknown reasons in a responding patient. Our results suggest that 2nd line therapy with PD-1 inhibitors plus BRAF±MEK inhibitors has substantial activity and manageable toxicity. This treatment can induce additional durable complete responses in patients who have progressed on initial immunotherapy. These results suggest further evaluation be performed of sequential PD-1 antibody treatment with cautious addition of targeted therapy in appropriate patients.

Samlowski W ，Adajar C 《BMC CANCER》

Investigation of clinical factors associated with longer overall survival in advanced melanoma patients treated with sequential ipilimumab.

Melanoma is one of the most serious form of skin cancer. Nowadays, ipilimumab is used for advanced melanoma refractory to first-line anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies. Thirty patients (male : female ratio, 18:12; median age, 60.5 years) sequentially treated with ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 antibody (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), while 58 (male : female ratio, 27:31; median age, 66.5 years) with anti-PD-1 antibody only. The kind of therapy and schedules were as follows: nivolumab, 2 mg/kg at 3-week intervals or at 3 mg/kg every 2 week; pembrolizumab, 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg at 3-week intervals for four doses. The sequential therapy was selected for the patients with disease progression and/or recovered from severe (immune-related [ir]) adverse events (AE) after PD-1 blockade monotherapy. We evaluated multiple parameters and analyzed their relevance to overall survival (OS). The best objective response rate was 6.7% in sequential ipilimumab treatment. Median OS was 163 days (range, 16-489). Baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and performance status (PS) before sequential ipilimumab were associated with OS in univariate analyses. Baseline PS and irAE within 6 weeks after ipilimumab administration showed significant differences on multivariate analysis. Prior to first-line PD-1 blockade, these parameters were not associated with OS. The other factors (i.e. age, sex, number of doses, absolute neutrophil counts, neutrophil : lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein) were not associated with OS. [Correction added on 17 April 2019, after first online publication: 'not related to OS' has been amended to 'not associated with OS'.] Ipilimumab as sequential therapy did not appear to improve OS and was associated with more severe irAE than PD-1 blockade monotherapy. We need to carefully consider treating patients with poor PS and low ALC.

Muto Y ，Kitano S ，Tsutsumida A ，Namikawa K ，Takahashi A ，Nakamura Y ，Yamanaka T ，Yamamoto N ，Yamazaki N ... -  《-》