Similar efficacy and safety of dolutegravir between age groups of HIV-1-infected paediatric and young adult patients aged 5 years and older.

The aim of the study was to carry out a comparison of the safety and efficacy of dolutegravir-based regimens among age groups of HIV-1-infected paediatric and young adult patients. This retrospective monocentric study included 109 patients infected since childhood who began receiving dolutegravir between January 2014 and December 2017. The patients were divided into three groups according to age at the time of dolutegravir initiation: 5-11, 12-17 and 18-25 years old. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a plasma viral load (PVL) < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL within 3 months of dolutegravir initiation (for patients with detectable viraemia at baseline), and maintaining virological suppression (PVL < 50 copies/mL) until the last follow-up visit (for all patients). Most of the subjects were antiretroviral-experienced (91.7%) and virologically suppressed at baseline (66.7%, 54.9% and 56.0% in the 5-11, 12-17 and 18-25 year age groups, respectively). Median follow-up was 24 months (range 6-54 months). Sustained virological success throughout follow-up was observed in 79.8% of patients, with similar rates among age groups (87.9%, 72.5% and 84.0%, respectively; P = 0.22). With reinforced measures to improve adherence, undetectable PVL was obtained at the last visit in 88.1% of patients, with similar proportions among age groups (93.9%, 84.3% and 88.0%, respectively; P = 0.51). No emergence of resistance mutations was observed in the 22 patients with virological failure. Dolutegravir was well tolerated; only one patient stopped treatment for severe drug-related side effects. The virological efficacy and safety of dolutegravir were similar among the three age groups. Because of its high genetic barrier to resistance, dolutegravir could be especially useful in the paediatric population, in which the risk of poor treatment adherence is high.

Frange P ，Avettand-Fenoel V ，Veber F ，Blanche S ... -  《-》

Efficacy and tolerance of dolutegravir-based combined ART in perinatally HIV-1-infected adolescents: a French multicentre retrospective study.

To assess the safety and efficacy of a dolutegravir-based regimen in perinatally HIV-1-infected adolescents. We conducted a retrospective multicentre study of 50 adolescents beginning dolutegravir-based treatment regimens between January 2014 and December 2015. Clinical and biological data collected before and after dolutegravir initiation were analysed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a plasma viral load (PVL) <50 copies/mL within 3 months of dolutegravir initiation (for patients with detectable viraemia at baseline) and maintaining virological suppression (PVL <50 copies/mL) until the last follow-up visit (for all patients). Virological suppression was noted for 17/50 adolescents at baseline. Dolutegravir-based regimens maintained virological success in 14/17 patients (82%). The other three patients experienced a transient viral rebound, before PVL fell to < 50 copies/mL again, with no need to change the antiretroviral regimen. Thirty-three viraemic adolescents were enrolled. All but one had already received antiretroviral drugs. Virological success was achieved and maintained in 19/33 subjects (58%). Another three adolescents with initial virological failure had an undetectable PVL at the end of follow-up, with reinforced measures to improve compliance. Overall, sustained virological success was observed in 66% of patients and 78% of patients had an undetectable PVL at the last visit. Dolutegravir was well tolerated. Only one patient stopped treatment for severe drug-related adverse effects (dizziness and sleep disturbance). No emergence of resistance mutations was observed in patients with virological failure. Dolutegravir was safe and virologically effective in these patients, for whom multiple interventions were required to improve compliance.

Briand C ，Dollfus C ，Faye A ，Kantor E ，Avettand-Fenoel V ，Caseris M ，Descamps D ，Schneider V ，Tabone MD ，Vaudre G ，Veber F ，Blanche S ，Frange P ... -  《-》

Dolutegravir as maintenance monotherapy for HIV (DOMONO): a phase 2, randomised non-inferiority trial.

The high genetic barrier to resistance of dolutegravir might allow for its use as maintenance monotherapy in patients with HIV. We investigated whether dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for maintaining virological suppression in patients with HIV-1 infection successfully treated with combination ART. We did this open-label, phase 2, randomised non-inferiority trial at two medical centres in the Netherlands. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) were on combination ART, had been virologically suppressed (HIV RNA <50 copies per mL) for at least 6 months, and had CD4 nadirs of 200 cells per μL or higher, HIV RNA zeniths of 100 000 copies per mL or less, and no history of virological failure. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a web-based block randomisation method (variable block sizes of 4 and 6), to switch to dolutegravir monotherapy (50 mg once a day) either immediately or after a delay of 24 weeks of continued combination ART. Randomisation was stratified by HIV RNA zenith (<50 000 copies per mL vs 50 000-99 999 copies per mL). Investigators and patients were not masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA viral loads of less than 200 copies per mL at week 24, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. We did analyses in the on-treatment and intention-to-treat populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02401828. Between March 10, 2015, and Feb 4, 2016, we randomly assigned 51 patients to the immediate switch group and 53 patients to the delayed switch group. One patient who received immediate monotherapy discontinued treatment at week 12 because of disturbed sleep. At week 24, dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination ART, with plasma HIV RNA loads of 200 copies per mL or higher observed in 2% (1/50) of patients in the immediate switch group and in no patients in the delayed switch group (difference 2%, 95% CI -5 to 12). Of patients assigned to the delayed switch group, 47 (89%) switched to dolutegravir monotherapy at week 24, two (4%) of whom subsequently discontinued monotherapy because of headache (n=1) and disturbed sleep (n=1). Eight (8%) of the 95 patients who remained on dolutegravir monotherapy had virological failure; all had therapeutic plasma concentrations of dolutegravir. In three (38%) of the eight patients, mutations associated with resistance were detected in the integrase gene. According to a predefined stopping rule, detection of these mutations led to premature study discontinuation. Dolutegravir monotherapy was non-inferior to combination ART at 24 weeks. However, virological failure continued to occur thereafter and led to dolutegravir resistance. Dolutegravir should not be used as maintenance monotherapy. Erasmus Trustfonds.

Wijting I ，Rokx C ，Boucher C ，van Kampen J ，Pas S ，de Vries-Sluijs T ，Schurink C ，Bax H ，Derksen M ，Andrinopoulou ER ，van der Ende M ，van Gorp E ，Nouwen J ，Verbon A ，Bierman W ，Rijnders B ... -  《-》

ODYSSEY clinical trial design: a randomised global study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive children, with nested pharmacokinetic sub-studies to evaluate pragmatic WHO-weight-band based doluteg

Moore CL ，Turkova A ，Mujuru H ，Kekitiinwa A ，Lugemwa A ，Kityo CM ，Barlow-Mosha LN ，Cressey TR ，Violari A ，Variava E ，Cotton MF ，Archary M ，Compagnucci A ，Puthanakit T ，Behuhuma O ，Saϊdi Y ，Hakim J ，Amuge P ，Atwine L ，Musiime V ，Burger DM ，Shakeshaft C ，Giaquinto C ，Rojo P ，Gibb DM ，Ford D ，ODYSSEY Trial Team ... -  《BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES》

Dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV: week 48 results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SAILING study.

Dolutegravir (GSK1349572), a once-daily HIV integrase inhibitor, has shown potent antiviral response and a favourable safety profile. We evaluated safety, efficacy, and emergent resistance in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV-1 with at least two-class drug resistance. ING111762 (SAILING) is a 48 week, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study that began in October, 2010. Eligible patients had two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA assessments of 400 copies per mL or higher (unless >1000 copies per mL at screening), resistance to two or more classes of antiretroviral drugs, and had one to two fully active drugs for background therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to once-daily dolutegravir 50 mg or twice-daily raltegravir 400 mg, with investigator-selected background therapy. Matching placebo was given, and study sites were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, evaluated in all participants randomly assigned to treatment groups who received at least one dose of study drug, excluding participants at one site with violations of good clinical practice. Non-inferiority was prespecified with a 12% margin; if non-inferiority was established, then superiority would be tested per a prespecified sequential testing procedure. A key prespecified secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent integrase-inhibitor resistance. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01231516. Analysis included 715 patients (354 dolutegravir; 361 raltegravir). At week 48, 251 (71%) patients on dolutegravir had HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL versus 230 (64%) patients on raltegravir (adjusted difference 7·4%, 95% CI 0·7 to 14·2); superiority of dolutegravir versus raltegravir was then concluded (p=0·03). Significantly fewer patients had virological failure with treatment-emergent integrase-inhibitor resistance on dolutegravir (four vs 17 patients; adjusted difference -3·7%, 95% CI -6·1 to -1·2; p=0·003). Adverse event frequencies were similar across groups; the most commonly reported events for dolutegravir versus raltegravir were diarrhoea (71 [20%] vs 64 [18%] patients), upper respiratory tract infection (38 [11%] vs 29 [8%]), and headache (33 [9%] vs 31 [9%]). Safety events leading to discontinuation were infrequent in both groups (nine [3%] dolutegravir, 14 [4%] raltegravir). Once-daily dolutegravir, in combination with up to two other antiretroviral drugs, is well tolerated with greater virological effect compared with twice-daily raltegravir in this treatment-experienced patient group. ViiV Healthcare.

Cahn P ，Pozniak AL ，Mingrone H ，Shuldyakov A ，Brites C ，Andrade-Villanueva JF ，Richmond G ，Buendia CB ，Fourie J ，Ramgopal M ，Hagins D ，Felizarta F ，Madruga J ，Reuter T ，Newman T ，Small CB ，Lombaard J ，Grinsztejn B ，Dorey D ，Underwood M ，Griffith S ，Min S ，extended SAILING Study Team ... -  《-》