Thiotepa, Fludarabine, and Busulfan Conditioning Regimen before T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Bicentric Experience of 100 Patients.

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is an alternative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who lack HLA-matched donors. Relapse after haplo-SCT remains a major concern, especially after nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens. Promising results were reported for TBF-based conditioning regimens (thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine) in patients transplanted from different categories of donors and for various disease types but not specifically in PT-Cy haplo-SCT for AML. Here we evaluate the outcome of 100 AML patients who received haplo-SCT with PT-Cy after TBF conditioning regimens (reduced-intensity conditioning, n = 77; myeloablative conditioning, n = 23) in 2 transplant programs. Cumulative incidences of grades III to IV acute and moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 7% and 14%, respectively. NRM at 2 years was 28%, significantly influenced by disease status at haplo-SCT (first complete response [CR1] versus advanced AML: 16% versus 38%, P = .016) but not by conditioning intensity or age. The cumulative incidences of relapse at 2 years were 17% and 24% in CR1 and advanced AML, respectively (not significant). Progression-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD and relapse-free survival at 2 years were 67%, 71%, and 49% in CR1 patients, respectively, whereas comparative values in patients with advanced disease were 37%, 41%, and 32%. Our study suggests that TBF conditioning for PT-Cy haplo-SCT is safe and effective for AML patients in CR1. In patients with more advanced disease, the relatively low incidence of relapse seems counterbalanced by a high nonrelapse mortality, underlining the need for alternative strategies to decrease relapse risk, without increasing the intensity of conditioning regimen.

Pagliardini T ，Castagna L ，Harbi S ，Porta MD ，Rey J ，Fürst S ，Bramanti S ，Saillard C ，Legrand F ，Maisano V ，Faucher C ，Granata A ，Hospital MA ，Lining W ，Weiller PJ ，Calmels B ，Charbonnier A ，Lemarie C ，Chabannon C ，Vey N ，Mokart D ，Blaise D ，Devillier R ... -  《-》

Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Fludarabine Conditioning Regimen in T Cell-Replete HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

We report the outcomes of 51 patients who underwent unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG), from peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow, after receipt of a TBF (thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine) conditioning regimen. Their median age was 55 years (range, 16 to 72 years). Hematologic diagnoses included acute leukemias (n = 31), lymphoid neoplasm (n = 12), myeloproliferative neoplasm (n = 5), and myelodysplastic syndromes (n = 3). Thirty-seven patients (73%) were in complete remission. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and mycophenolate for all patients, associated with ATG in 39 patients (76.5%). The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 17 days (range, 12 to 34 days). The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD were 27.5% and 14%, respectively. In patients receiving a PBSC graft and ATG prophylaxis, grade II-IV aGVHD occurred in 16% of patients. The use of ATG and a lower thiotepa dose (5 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg) were associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (P = .03 and .005, respectively). The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 29% and was significantly reduced to 13% with the lower thiotepa dose (P = .002). After a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 12 to 62 months), the cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality, relapse, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GFRFS) were 20%, 22.5%, 67%, 58%, and 51%, respectively. Pretransplantation disease status (complete remission versus others) was the main factor associated with OS, DFS, and GFRFS. In conclusion, the TBF conditioning regimen is an appealing platform in the haplo-HSCT setting with PT-Cy in terms of engraftment rate, toxicity, and disease control. We found no benefit of a thiotepa dose of 10 mg/kg compared with a dose of 5 mg/kg. ATG reduced the risk of acute GVHD without comprising outcomes.

Duléry R ，Bastos J ，Paviglianiti A ，Malard F ，Brissot E ，Battipaglia G ，Médiavilla C ，Giannotti F ，Banet A ，de Wyngaert ZV ，Ledraa T ，Belhocine R ，Sestili S ，Adaeva R ，Lapusan S ，Isnard F ，Legrand O ，Vekhoff A ，Rubio MT ，Ruggeri A ，Mohty M ... -  《-》

Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine compared to busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplant from matched siblings and unrelated donors for acute myeloid leukemia.

Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) is the traditional conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) for young, fit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF) protocol has recently demonstrated promising outcome in cord blood and haploidentical SCT; however, there is limited evidence about this regimen in transplant from matched siblings (MSD) and unrelated donors (UD). We retrospectively compared outcomes of 2523 patients aged 18-50 with AML in remission, undergoing transplant from MSD or UD prepared with either TBF or BuCy conditioning. A 1:3 pair-matched analysis was performed: 146 patients receiving TBF were compared with 438 patients receiving BuCy. Relapse risk was significantly lower in the TBF when compared with BuCy group (HR 0.6, P = .02), while NRM did not differ. No significant difference was observed in LFS and OS between the two regimens. TBF was associated with a trend towards higher risk of grades III-IV aGVHD (HR 1.8, P = .06) and inferior cGVHD (HR 0.7, P = .04) when compared with BuCy. In patients undergoing transplant in first remission, the advantage for TBF in terms of relapse was more evident (HR 0.4, P = .02), leading to a trend for better LFS in favor of TBF (HR 0.7, P = .10), while OS did not differ between the two cohorts. In conclusion, TBF represents a valid myeloablative conditioning regimen providing significantly lower relapse and similar survival when compared with BuCy. Patients in first remission appear to gain the most from this protocol, as in this subgroup a tendency for better LFS was observed when compared with BuCy.

Saraceni F ，Beohou E ，Labopin M ，Arcese W ，Bonifazi F ，Stepensky P ，Aljurf M ，Bruno B ，Pioltelli P ，Passweg J ，Sociè G ，Santarone S ，Yakoub-Agha I ，Lanza F ，Savani BN ，Mohty M ，Nagler A ，Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) ... -  《-》

Comparable outcomes of haploidentical transplant with TBF conditioning versus matched unrelated donor with fludarabine/busulfan conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia.

Bazarbachi A ，Labopin M ，Blaise D ，Forcade E ，Socié G ，Berceanu A ，Angelucci E ，Bulabois CE ，Kröger N ，Rambaldi A ，Ceballos P ，Mielke S ，El Cheikh J ，Yakoub-Agha I ，Savani B ，Spyridonidis A ，Nagler A ，Mohty M ... -  《-》

Comparative effectiveness of busulfan/cyclophosphamide versus busulfan/fludarabine myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Busulfan/cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) and busulfan/fludarabine (Bu/Flu) are both standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). We compared the effectiveness of these regimens with a focus on quality of life (QOL). This was a single center, retrospective analysis of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients who underwent a first T-cell replete HLA-8/8 matched related or unrelated donor alloHCT. Patients received a myeloablative regimen of either parenteral Bu/Cy or Bu/Flu. Outcomes assessed included infections, graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), relapse, relapse mortality (RM), relapse-free survival (RFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), and QOL. From 2008 to 2017, 126 AML and 84 MDS adult patients age ≥18 years were identified meeting inclusion criteria. In terms of QOL, there were no significant differences between Bu/Cy and Bu/Flu cohorts in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant Scale (FACT-BMT) scores or mucositis severity for either AML or MDS patients. Amongst AML patients, those receiving Bu/Flu had more rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery and a shorter length of hospital stay (LOS); there were no differences in the other posttransplant outcomes. Similarly, amongst MDS patients, those receiving Bu/Flu had more rapid platelet recovery and a shorter LOS as well as more CMV infections, but less NRM and no differences in other outcomes. We confirmed that myeloablative Bu/Flu conditioning has comparable clinical and QOL outcomes to Bu/Cy.

Patel SS ，Rybicki L ，Pohlman B ，Bolwell B ，Gerds AT ，Hamilton BK ，Hanna R ，Kalaycio M ，Majhail NS ，Sobecks R ... -  《-》