Efficacy and safety of berberine for several cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Berberine has been widely used for the adjuvant therapy of several cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, evidence for its efficacy remains controversial.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of berberine in CVDs.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
We searched ten electronic databases for articles from inception to December 23, 2022. RCTs comparing berberine alone or combined with statins versus statins or routine for CVDs were included. Meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook.
Forty-four RCTs were included with 4606 patients. There were no differences between berberine alone and routine or statins in improving total cholesterol (TC) (SMD, 0.43; 95% CI, -0.39 to 1.24; p = 0.30; I2 = 95%), triglyceride (TG) (SMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.21; p = 0.44; I2 = 76%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI, -0.23 to 1.60; p = 0.14; I2 = 96%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, -0.48 to 1.57; p = 0.30; I2 = 96%), and Crouse score levels. Berberine alone significantly reduced National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and intima-media thickness (IMT) levels than routine therapy. Berberine plus statins significantly reduced TC, TG, LDL-C, NIHSS score, hs-CRP, TNF-α, IMT, Crouse score, and number of unstable plaques levels than routine or statins. However, no differences were found between groups in improving HDL-C and IL-6 levels. There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of adverse reactions.
This study suggests that berberine may be a promising alternative for CVDs with no serious adverse reactions. However, our results may be limited by the quality of existing research. High-quality RCTs are needed to provide more convinced evidence.
Yang L
，Zhu W
，Zhang X
，Zhou X
，Wu W
，Shen T
... -
《-》
Efficacy and safety of berberine for dyslipidaemias: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
In recent years, berberine has become widely used as an effective alternative to treat dyslipidaemias; much clinical evidence has emerged. It is important to systematically and critically evaluate the existing evidence.
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of berberine in patients with dyslipidaemias.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Five electronic databases were searched up to Apr 15, 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of berberine in treatment of dyslipidaemias. The outcomes were lipid profile parameters and adverse events. Study selection, data collection, risk of bias assessment, data analyses and interpretations were conducted according to the Cochrane handbook.
Sixteen trials with total of 2147 participants were judged to be eligible and were included in the meta-analysis. The included trials were assessed to be of high clinical heterogeneity. The methodological quality of the majority of the trials was generally low in terms of random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and incomplete outcome data. Thus, selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias and confounding bias might exist. Meta-analysis showed that berberine significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol (TC) (MD = -0.47 mmol/l 95% CI [-0.64, -0.31], p < 0.00001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (MD =-0.38 mmol/l 95% CI [-0.53, -0.22], p < 0.00001) and triglycerides (TG) (MD = -0.28 mmol/l 95% CI [-0.46, -0.10], p = 0.002). Berberine also increased the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when used alone (MD = 0.08 mmol/l 95% CI [0.03, 0.12], p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.64 95% CI [0.31, 1.30], p = 0.22). No severe adverse effects were reported in either group.
Berberine improves lipid profiles in dyslipidaemias with satisfactory safety. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of the high clinical heterogeneity and high risk of bias in the included trials. Rigorous clinical trials should be carried out to provide more reliable evidence.
Ju J
，Li J
，Lin Q
，Xu H
... -
《-》
Meta-analysis of the effect and safety of berberine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipemia and hypertension.
Berberine, extracted from Coptis Root and Phellodendron Chinese, has been frequently used for the adjuvant treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in China. Safety and efficacy studies in terms of evidence-based medical practice have become more prevalent in application to Chinese Herbal Medicine. It is necessary to assess the efficacy and safety of berberine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia and hypertension by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of available clinical data.
We searched the English databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane library, EMbase, etc., and Chinese databases including China biomedical literature database (CBM), Chinese Technology Journal Full-text Database, Chinese journal full text database (CNKI), and Wanfang digital periodical full text database. Relevant studies were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan5.0 software after data extraction and the quality of studies assessment.
Twenty-seven randomized controlled clinical trials were included with 2569 patients. There are seven subgroups in our meta-analysis: berberine versus placebo or berberine with intensive lifestyle intervention versus intensive lifestyle intervention alone; berberine combined with oral hypoglycemic versus hypoglycemic alone; berberine versus oral hypoglycemic; berberine combined with oral lipid lowering drugs versus lipid lowering drugs alone; berberine versus oral lipid lowering drugs; berberine combined with oral hypotensor versus hypotensive medications; berberine versus oral hypotensive medications. In the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, we found that berberine with lifestyle intervention tended to lower the level of FPG, PPG and HbA1c than lifestyle intervention alone or placebo; the same as berberine combined with oral hypoglycaemics to the same hypoglycaemics; but there was no statistical significance between berberine and oral hypoglycaemics. As for the treatment of hyperlipidemia, berberine with lifestyle intervention was better than lifestyle intervention, berberine with oral lipid lowering drugs was better than lipid lowering drugs alone in reducing the level of TC and LDL-C, and raising the level of HDL-C. In the comparative study between berberine and oral lipid lowering drugs, there was no statistical significance in reducing the level of TC and LDL-C, but berberine shows better effect in lowering the level of TG and raising the level of HDL-C. In the treatment of hypertension, berberine with lifestyle intervention tended to lower the level of blood pressure more than the lifestyle intervention alone or placebo did; The same occurred when berberine combined with oral hypotensor was compared to the same hypotensor. Notably, no serious adverse reaction was reported in the 27 experiments.
This study indicates that berberine has comparable therapeutic effect on type 2 DM, hyperlipidemia and hypertension with no serious side effect. Considering the relatively low cost compared with other first-line medicine and treatment, berberine might be a good alternative for low socioeconomic status patients to treat type 2 DM, hyperlipidemia, hypertension over long time period. Due to overall limited quality of the included studies, the therapeutic benefit of berberine can be substantiated to a limited degree. Better methodological quality, large controlled trials using standardized preparation are expected to further quantify the therapeutic effect of berberine.
Lan J
，Zhao Y
，Dong F
，Yan Z
，Zheng W
，Fan J
，Sun G
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
