Evaluation of Bony Anatomy Versus Endobiliary Stents as Surrogates for Volumetric Image Guidance in Pancreatic Cancer.

Online treatment setup verification through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in pancreatic cancer patients is limited by low soft tissue contrast. This study aims to quantify the relative positional displacements between bony anatomy and endobiliary stents as surrogates for pancreatic cancers. Under ethics approval, 258 localization CBCT images from 15 pancreatic patients with endobiliary stents were evaluated. CBCTs were registered through two methods to assess translations and rotations: target adjacent bony anatomy through automatic registration and automatic stent registration through a shaped region of interest. Displacement vector differences between surrogate registrations were calculated and analysed. Mean (±standard deviation) translational displacements in the right/left, superior/inferior, anterior/posterior directions were 0.9 ± 3.1 mm, 1.8 ± 4.2 mm, and 0.4 ± 2.5 mm for bone registrations, respectively, and 0.9 ± 5.6 mm, -1.5 ± 5.7 mm, and -0.5 ± 4.3 mm for stent registrations, respectively. Mean (±standard deviation) rotational displacements for pitch, roll, and yaw were 0.16 ± 0.97°, -0.32 ± 0.96°, and -0.77 ± 1.8° for bone registrations, respectively, and -0.94 ± 4.6°, -0.4 ± 7.4°, and -0.13 ± 6.64° for stent registrations, respectively. Mean displacement vector between surrogates was 4 mm, with 43% of fractions measuring displacement vectors >5 mm. A maximum displacement vector of 22.6 mm between surrogates was observed. Varying positional differences were observed between bone and stent registration for pancreas CBCT-image-guided radiation therapy. Setup errors for stent matching were larger than bone registrations. Further research is required to determine if endobiliary stent position is equivalent to the pancreas' location to determine its suitability as a surrogate.

Chortogiannos C ，Moseley D ，Chen J ，Pellizzari A ，Brierley J ，Li W ... -  《-》

Limited role for biliary stent as surrogate fiducial marker in pancreatic cancer: stent and intratumoral fiducials compared.

Because of low soft-tissue contrast of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), fiducial markers are often used for radiation therapy patient setup verification. For pancreatic cancer patients, biliary stents have been suggested as surrogate fiducials. Using intratumoral fiducials as standard for tumor position, this study aims to quantify the suitability of biliary stents for measuring interfractional and respiratory-induced position variations of pancreatic tumors. Eleven pancreatic cancer patients with intratumoral fiducials and a biliary stent were included in this study. Daily CBCT scans (243 in total) were registered with a reference CT scan, based on bony anatomy, on fiducial markers, and on the biliary stent, respectively. We analyzed the differences in tumor position (ie, markers center-of-mass position) among these 3 registrations. In addition, we measured for 9 patients the magnitude of respiratory-induced motion (MM) of the markers and of the stent on 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) and determined the difference between these 2 magnitudes (ΔMM). The stent indicated tumor position better than bony anatomy in 67% of fractions; the absolute difference between the markers and stent registration was >5 mm in 46% of fractions and >10 mm in 20% of fractions. Large PTV margins (superior-inferior direction, >19 mm) would be needed to account for this interfractional position variability. On 4DCT, we found in superior-inferior direction a mean ΔMM of 0.5 mm (range, -2.6 to 4.2 mm). For respiratory-induced motion, the mean ΔMM is small, but for individual patients the absolute difference can be >4 mm. For interfractional position variations, a stent is, on average, a better surrogate fiducial than bony anatomy, but large PTV margins would still be required. Therefore, intratumoral fiducials are recommended for online setup verification for all pancreatic patients scheduled for radiation therapy, including patients with a biliary stent.

van der Horst A ，Lens E ，Wognum S ，de Jong R ，van Hooft JE ，van Tienhoven G ，Bel A ... -  《-》

Use of implanted gold fiducial markers with MV-CBCT image-guided IMRT for pancreatic tumours.

Visualisation of soft tissues such as pancreatic tumours by mega-voltage cone beam CT (MV-CBCT) is frequently difficult and daily localisation is often based on more easily seen adjacent bony anatomy. Fiducial markers implanted into pancreatic tumours serve as surrogates for tumour position and may more accurately represent absolute tumour position. Differences in daily shifts based on alignment to implanted fiducial markers vs. alignment to adjacent bony anatomy were compared. Gold fiducial markers were placed into the pancreatic tumour under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance in 12 patients. Patients subsequently received image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT). MV-CBCT was performed prior to each fraction and isocentre shifts were performed based on alignment to the fiducial markers. We retrospectively reviewed archived MV-CBCT datasets and calculated shift differences in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) axes relative to shifts based on alignment to adjacent bony anatomy. Two hundred forty-three fractions were analysed. The mean absolute difference in isocentre shifts between the fiducial markers and those aligned to bony anatomy was 3.4 mm (range 0-13 mm), 6.3 mm (range 0-21 mm) and 2.6 mm (range 0-12 mm), in LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. The mean three-dimensional vector shift difference between markers vs. bony anatomy alignment was 8.6 mm. These data suggest that fiducial markers used in conjunction with MV-CBCT improve the accuracy of daily target delineation compared with localisation using adjacent bony anatomy and that gold fiducial markers using MV-CBCT alignment are a viable option for target localisation during IG-IMRT.

Packard M ，Gayou O ，Gurram K ，Weiss B ，Thakkar S ，Kirichenko A ... -  《-》

Interfractional position variation of pancreatic tumors quantified using intratumoral fiducial markers and daily cone beam computed tomography.

The aim of this study was to quantify interfractional pancreatic position variation using fiducial markers visible on daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. In addition, we analyzed possible migration of the markers to investigate their suitability for tumor localization. For 13 pancreatic cancer patients with implanted Visicoil markers, CBCT scans were obtained before 17 to 25 fractions (300 CBCTs in total). Image registration with the reference CT was used to determine the displacement of the 2 to 3 markers relative to bony anatomy and to each other. We analyzed the distance between marker pairs as a function of time to identify marker registration error (SD of linear fit residuals) and possible marker migration. For each patient, we determined the mean displacement of markers relative to the reference CT (systematic position error) and the spread in displacements (random position error). From this, we calculated the group systematic error, Σ, and group random error, σ. Marker pair distances showed slight trends with time (range, -0.14 to 0.14 mm/day), possibly due to tissue deformation, but no shifts that would indicate marker migration. The mean SD of the fit residuals was 0.8 mm. We found large interfractional position variations, with for 116 of 300 (39%) fractions a 3-dimensional vector displacement of >10 mm. The spread in displacement varied significantly (P<.01) between patients, from a vector range of 9.1 mm to one of 24.6 mm. For the patient group, Σ was 3.8, 6.6, and 3.5 mm; and σ was 3.6, 4.7 and 2.5 mm, in left-right, superior-inferior, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. We found large systematic displacements of the fiducial markers relative to bony anatomy, in addition to wide distributions of displacement. These results for interfractional position variation confirm the potential benefit of using fiducial markers rather than bony anatomy for daily online position verification for pancreatic cancer patients.

van der Horst A ，Wognum S ，Dávila Fajardo R ，de Jong R ，van Hooft JE ，Fockens P ，van Tienhoven G ，Bel A ... -  《-》

Feasibility of Gold Fiducial Markers as a Surrogate for Gross Tumor Volume Position in Image-Guided Radiation Therapy of Rectal Cancer.

To evaluate the feasibility of fiducial markers as a surrogate for gross tumor volume (GTV) position in image-guided radiation therapy of rectal cancer. We analyzed 35 fiducials in 19 patients with rectal cancer who received short-course radiation therapy or long-course chemoradiation therapy. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed before and after the first week of radiation therapy, and daily pre- and postirradiation cone beam computed tomography scans were acquired in the first week of radiation therapy. Between the 2 magnetic resonance imaging examinations, the fiducial displacement relative to the center of gravity of the GTV (COGGTV) and the COGGTV displacement relative to bony anatomy were determined. Using the cone beam computed tomography scans, inter- and intrafraction fiducial displacement relative to bony anatomy were determined. The systematic error of the fiducial displacement relative to the COGGTV was 2.8, 2.4, and 4.2 mm in the left-right, anterior-posterior (AP), and craniocaudal (CC) directions, respectively. Large interfraction systematic errors of up to 8.0 mm and random errors up to 4.7 mm were found for COGGTV and fiducial displacements relative to bony anatomy, mostly in the AP and CC directions. For tumors located in the mid and upper rectum, these errors were up to 9.4 mm (systematic) and 5.6 mm (random) compared with 4.9 mm and 2.9 mm for tumors in the lower rectum. Systematic and random errors of the intrafraction fiducial displacement relative to bony anatomy were ≤2.1 mm in all directions. Large interfraction errors of the COGGTV and the fiducials relative to bony anatomy were found. Therefore, despite the observed fiducial displacement relative to the COGGTV, the use of fiducials as a surrogate for GTV position reduces the required margins in the AP and CC directions for a GTV boost using image-guided radiation therapy of rectal cancer. This reduction in margin may be larger in patients with tumors located in the mid and upper rectum compared with the lower rectum.

van den Ende RPJ ，Kerkhof EM ，Rigter LS ，van Leerdam ME ，Peters FP ，van Triest B ，Staring M ，Marijnen CAM ，van der Heide UA ... -  《-》