Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: An algorithm of treatment.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) following total hip arthroplasty are becoming more prevalent and management of these fractures is often demanding. The surgeon has to assess in detail implant loosening, bone loss and type of fracture. The aim of the study is to identify the suitability of a treatment algorithm, based on the Vancouver classification that takes into account the activity and comorbidity of each patient. This study retrospectively assessed 38 patients who were surgically treated for a PFF around total hip arthroplasty between 2010 and 2014. All fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification. There were 14 type B1, 8 type B2, 10 type B3 and 6 type C fractures. The data examined were age, sex, mechanism of injury, type of fracture, ASA score, type of surgery and complications. Radiographic evaluations were performed at 1, 3, 6 months and every 12 months thereafter. Clinical results were measured using the Merle-d'Aubigné-Postel score. Treatment options included an ORIF in 22 patients and a stem revision in 16 patients, with or without plates or supplemental cortical strut grafting when required. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.1 years, mean age was 71.2 years and six patients (15.7%) died. Union was obtained in all patients in a mean of 16 weeks. Three patients required a surgical revision: one for stem loosening and two for re-fracture after a new fall. One patient had varus malunion of the femur. The mean postoperative Merle-d'Aubigné-Postel score was 13.2. Thirteen patients showed excellent results, 14 had a good result, three had a fair outcome and two had a poor result. Twenty patients returned to their baseline mobility status, while 12 patients had either a decline in their ambulatory status or a need for additional assistive devices. PFF remains a serious complication of hip arthroplasty that is accompanied by high morbidity and mortality rates. This study shows how patients' comorbidities and functional demand can direct the proper treatment. This is a suitable algorithm for the treatment of PFF, which can provide satisfactory results in terms of pain and function.

Pavone V ，de Cristo C ，Di Stefano A ，Costarella L ，Testa G ，Sessa G ... -  《-》

[Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications].

Pavelka T ，Salášek M ，Weisová D 《Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca》

Re-fractures after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A difficult to treat growing evidence.

Periprosthetic fractures are increasing. The treatment is mostly surgical, but it has a high complication rate. Re-fracture and non-union with implant failure are the more frequent complications. Those complications are difficult to treat and can lead to severe disability. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical results of periprosthetic femoral re-fracture treatment. Twenty patients were treated for femoral re-fractures (17 women, 3 men). The mean age and follow-up are 75.7 years (46-95) and 6.15 years (0.4-15) respectively. The diagnosis of new periprosthetic fracture according to Vancouver classification were: 3 type A, 5 type B1, 1 type B2, 2 B3, 8 type C; 1 Lewis-Rorabeck type II. Patients were followed-up clinically, with a Harris Hip Score, and radiologically at 2, 4, 6, 12 months, and then annually. All patients healed except for two cases in which an infection occurred. Two cases, treated with plate osteosynthesis, had a malunion in varus. Six patients died for unrelated reasons after fracture healing. One patient was excluded because of a follow-up shorter than 12 months. In 16 cases (84%) a Trendelenburg gait or the use of aids for walking has been necessary. At final follow-up the mean HHS was 65 (range 45-82). Fractures treatment differed depending on the type of the fracture, prosthesis stability and bone loss. Tension band wiring, long plate fixation, revision with a long stem with cables or a sandwich technique (two plates or one plate plus one strut graft) have been performed according to fracture type. Re-fractures and non-union with implant failure are common after periprosthetic fracture treatment. Infection and malunion are the main complications of their treatment. Residual limping with the necessity of aids even after fracture healing is often present. The choice of a correct surgical strategy is essential to minimize the risk of new complications and ensure the highest possibility to heal. The most important factor is to achieve a good stability, a reasonable vital environment and don't leave new areas of lower resistance uncovered. Poor functional outcome has to be expected especially in refracture after a revision surgery.

Randelli F ，Pace F ，Priano D ，Giai Via A ，Randelli P ... -  《-》

Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Arthroplasty Vancouver Type B.

Bulatović N ，Kezunović M ，Vučetić Č ，Abdić N ，Benčić I ，Čengić T ... -  《Acta Clinica Croatica》

Uncemented extensive porous titanium-coated long femoral stem prostheses are effective in treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A retrospective mid- to long-term follow-up study.

Wang Q ，Li D ，Kang P 《-》