Infertile women below the age of 40 have similar anti-Müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count compared with women of the same age with no history of infertility.
Do infertile patients below the age of 40 years have a lower ovarian reserve, estimated by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and total antral follicle count (AFC), than women of the same age with no history of infertility?
Serum AMH and AFC were not lower in infertile patients aged 20-39 years compared with a control group of the same age with no history of infertility. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: The management of patients with a low ovarian reserve and a poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) remains a challenge in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Both AMH levels and AFC reflect the ovarian reserve and are valuable predictors of the ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophins. However, there is a large inter-individual variation in the age-related depletion of the ovarian reserve and a broad variability in the levels of AMH and AFC compatible with conception. Women with an early depletion of the ovarian reserve may experience infertility as a consequence of postponement of childbearing. Thus, low ovarian reserve is considered to be overrepresented among infertile patients.
A prospective cohort study including 382 women with a male partner referred to fertility treatment at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark during 2011-2013 compared with a control group of 350 non-users of hormonal contraception with no history of infertility recruited during 2008-2010.
Included patients and controls were aged 20-39 years. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome were excluded. On Cycle Days 2-5, AFC and ovarian volume were measured by transvaginal sonography, and serum levels of AMH, FSH and LH were assessed.
Infertile patients had similar AMH levels (11%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1;24%) and AFC (1%, 95% CI: -7;8%) compared with controls with no history of infertility in an age-adjusted linear regression analysis. The prevalence of very low AMH levels (<5 pmol/l) was similar in the two cohorts (age-adjusted odds ratio: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.5;1.7). The findings persisted after adjustment for smoking status, body mass index, gestational age at birth, previous conception and chronic disease in addition to age.
The comparison of ovarian reserve parameters in women recruited at different time intervals could be a reason for caution. However, all women were examined at the same centre using the same sonographic algorithm and AMH immunoassay.
This study indicates that the frequent observation of patients with a poor response to COS in ART may not be due to an overrepresentation of women with an early depletion of the ovarian reserve but rather a result of the expected age-related decline in fertility.
The study received funding from MSD and the Interregional European Union (EU) projects 'ReproSund' and 'ReproHigh'. The authors have no conflict of interest.
Not applicable.
Hvidman HW
，Bentzen JG
，Thuesen LL
，Lauritsen MP
，Forman JL
，Loft A
，Pinborg A
，Nyboe Andersen A
... -
《-》
The effect of serum vitamin D levels on ovarian reserve markers: a prospective cross-sectional study.
Is there any association between serum 25-OH vitamin D levels and ovarian reserve markers in infertile women?
Vitamin D is not associated with the ovarian reserve markers, anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC), in infertile women.
The mechanism underlying the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and reproduction is still unclear; however, evidence indicates a potential direct negative impact on ovarian function. This is mainly due to the fact that gonadal function may be altered by vitamin D deficiency, as observed by the expression of vitamin D receptor mRNA in human ovaries, mixed ovarian cell cultures and granulosa cell cultures. On the other hand, results from clinical studies are conflicting, with some suggesting that vitamin D status is associated with ovarian reserve, whereas other cross-sectional studies have not found any significant correlation between vitamin D and AMH levels.
This study was a prospective cross-sectional study from the Centre for Reproductive Medicine at the University Hospital of Brussels. The duration of the study was one year.
Overall, the study included 283 consecutive infertile women younger than 42 years old and undergoing their first treatment cycle in our institution. All patients were recruited within a time interval of 12 months from the initiation of the study, before undergoing infertility treatment. Women consuming vitamin D supplements or taking medication for systematic disease or women who had undergone ovarian surgery were excluded from the study. All infertile women had serum AMH and vitamin D sampled on the same day. AFC was measured on the second or third day of the first cycle following the blood sampling for the determination of AMH and 25-OH vitamin D levels.
Among all patients, 30.7% (n = 87) were vitamin D deficient (<20 ng/mL) whereas 69.3% (n = 196) had normal vitamin D levels (≥20 ng/mL). The mean AMH and AFC levels did not differ significantly between the two groups: AMH 3.9 μ/L (±3.8) versus 4.3 μ/L (±4.8), (P value = 0.5) and AFC 13.9 (±13.3) versus 12.7 (±11.4), (P = 0.7), respectively. No correlation was observed between 25-O H vitamin D and AMH (spearman's r = 0.02, P value = 0.7) or AFC (spearman's r = -0.02, P value = 0.7). In multiple linear regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders (age, BMI, smoking status, infertility cause and season of blood sampling), the regression slope in all participants for total 25OH-D predicting log10 AMH was 0.006 [standard error (SE) = 0.07, P value = 0.9]. Similarly, no significant association was observed between AFC and vitamin D levels, even after controlling for relevant co-variants (regression coefficient -0.09. SE 0.08, P value = 0.2).
Although this is the first prospective study to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D and the most important ovarian reserve markers (AMH and AFC), we need to acknowledge that the data used to generate the study findings are cross-sectional in nature. In this regard, we cannot generate or exclude any causal effect hypothesis. Nevertheless, our data support that an association between vitamin D and ovarian reserve markers is highly unlikely to exist.
Although data from basic research indicate that vitamin D deficiency may have an effect on steroidogenesis and follicular development, our study, by prospectively recruiting a large number of infertile women, clearly demonstrates that vitamin D deficiency is highly unlikely to have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve. Ongoing prospective and translational research projects are currently being conducted in order to evaluate the potential effect of vitamin D deficiency on reproductive outcome mediated through either an effect on the oocyte quality or on endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation.
No external funding was used for this study. No conflicts of interest are declared.
N/A.
Drakopoulos P
，van de Vijver A
，Schutyser V
，Milatovic S
，Anckaert E
，Schiettecatte J
，Blockeel C
，Camus M
，Tournaye H
，Polyzos NP
... -
《-》
The status and comparison of ovarian reserve between fertile and infertile healthy Chinese women of reproductive age.
We aimed to investigate ovarian reserve status, and explore differences in ovarian reserve between fertile and infertile healthy Chinese women of reproductive age.We recruited 442 fertile women aged 23 to 49 years (mean: 35.22 ± 4.91 years) as subjects, and 196 infertile women aged 23 to 46 years (mean: 32.34 ± 4.34 years) as controls. For all participants, a number of parameters were tested on days 2 to 4 of a spontaneous cycle, including basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), total testosterone, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), ovarian response prediction index (ORPI), and antral follicle count (AFC).There were significant differences in terms of AFC, serum AMH levels, and ORPI among subject subgroups (10.58 ± 5.80; 2.533 ± 2.146 ng/mL; 1.28 ± 1.87; respectively), and among control subgroups (12.44 ± 5.69; 3.189 ± 2.551 ng/mL; 1.88 ± 2.68; respectively) (P < .01 for all). For both subjects and controls, AFC, AMH levels, and ORPI decreased gradually with increasing age, and presented with similar age-related trends; there were positive correlations between AMH and AFC (P < .001), and negative correlations between age and AFC, AMH, ORPI (P < .05 for all). There was a significant difference in age (P < .001), serum E2 (P < .01), and AMH (P < .01) levels between subjects and controls; however, when controlling for confounding factors (age, body mass index, total testosterone, and LH), we found no differences between the 2 groups with regards to the serum levels of AMH, FSH, E2, and AFC (P > .05 for all). Moreover, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the significant variables of subjects and controls for evaluating ovarian reserve included age, AMH and ORPI, and ORPI was more valuable than other variables.A diminished ovarian reserve was one of the manifestations caused by female aging. When confounding factors were controlled for, we found no differences in ovarian reserve when compared between fertile and infertile women, and no correlation with infertility.
Zhou SJ
，Sun TC
，Song LL
，Yang M
，Sun XP
，Tian L
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
