Effect of the humeral neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization on stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Lateralizing the glenosphere and decreasing the humeral neck-shaft angles are implant design parameters that reduce the risk of scapular impingement. The effects of these parameters on joint stability remain unclear. This study evaluated the effect of glenosphere lateralization and humeral neck-shaft angle on joint stability by quantifying the anterior dislocation force in different arm positions. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty was performed on 19 human shoulder specimens. Anterior dislocation force and maximum external rotation were evaluated using a robot-based shoulder simulator. By varying the neck-shaft angle and magnitudes of glenosphere lateralization, 12 configurations were analyzed with the glenohumeral joint in 30° and 60° of abduction, in neutral, and in 30° of external rotation. At 30° of abduction, measurements showed significantly higher dislocation forces for the 9-mm and 6-mm lateralized glenosphere than for the 0-mm (P < .0001, P = .007) nonlateralized glenosphere. At 60° of abduction, measurements showed significantly higher dislocation forces for the 9-mm and 6-mm lateralized glenosphere than for the 0-mm (P < .0001, P = .0007) and 3-mm (P = .0003, P = .04) glenosphere. Configurations with a neck-shaft angle of 135° showed significantly higher dislocation forces than configurations with a neck-shaft angle of 145° (P = .02) or 155° (P = .02) at 30° of abduction in 30° of external rotation. Neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization had no influence on maximum external rotation capability. Glenosphere lateralization significantly increased anterior stability of the glenohumeral joint without influencing the range of passive external rotation. The humeral neck-shaft angle only had a minor effect on anterior stability.

Ferle M ，Pastor MF ，Hagenah J ，Hurschler C ，Smith T ... -  《-》

Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

The variability in functional outcomes and the occurrence of scapular notching and instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty remain problems. The objectives of this study were to measure the effect of reverse humeral component neck-shaft angle on impingement-free range of motion, abduction moment, and anterior dislocation force and to evaluate the effect of subscapularis loading on dislocation force. Six cadaveric shoulders were tested with 155°, 145°, and 135° reverse shoulder humeral neck-shaft angles. The adduction angle at which bone contact occurred and the internal and external rotational impingement-free range of motion angles were measured. Glenohumeral abduction moment was measured at 0° and 30° of abduction, and anterior dislocation forces were measured at 30° of internal rotation, 0°, and 30° of external rotation with and without subscapularis loading. Adduction deficit angles for 155°, 145°, and 135° neck-shaft angle were 2° ± 5° of abduction, 7° ± 4° of adduction, and 12° ± 2° of adduction (P < .05). Impingement-free angles of humeral rotation and abduction moments were not statistically different between the neck-shaft angles. The anterior dislocation force was significantly higher for the 135° neck-shaft angle at 30° of external rotation and significantly higher for the 155° neck-shaft angle at 30° of internal rotation (P < .01). The anterior dislocation forces were significantly higher when the subscapularis was loaded (P < .01). The 155° neck-shaft angle was more prone to scapular bone contact during adduction but was more stable at the internally rotated position, which was the least stable humeral rotation position. Subscapularis loading gave further anterior stability with all neck-shaft angles at all positions.

Oh JH ，Shin SJ ，McGarry MH ，Scott JH ，Heckmann N ，Lee TQ ... -  《-》

The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion.

Little is known about the effects of glenosphere diameter on shoulder joint loads. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to investigate the effects of glenosphere diameter on joint load, load angle, and total deltoid force required for active abduction and range of motion in internal/external rotation and abduction. A custom, instrumented reverse shoulder arthroplasty implant system capable of measuring joint load and varying glenosphere diameter (38 and 42 mm) and glenoid offset (neutral and lateral) was implanted in 6 cadaveric shoulders to provide at least 80% power for all variables. A shoulder motion simulator was used to produce active glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion. All implant configurations were tested with active and passive motion with joint kinematics, loads, and moments recorded. At neutral and lateralized glenosphere positions, increasing diameter significantly increased joint load (+12 ± 21 N and +6 ± 9 N; P < .01) and deltoid load required for active abduction (+9 ± 22 N and +11 ± 15 N; P < .02), whereas joint load angle was unaffected (P > .8). Passive internal rotation was reduced with increased diameter at both neutral and lateralized glenosphere positions (-6° ± 6° and -12° ± 6°; P < .002); however, external rotation was not affected (P > .05). At neutral glenosphere position, increasing diameter increased the maximum angles of both adduction (+1° ± 1°; P = .03) and abduction (+8° ± 9°; P < .05). Lateralization also increased abduction range of motion compared with neutral (P < .01). Although increasing glenosphere diameter significantly increased joint load and deltoid force, the clinical impact of these changes is presently unclear. Internal rotation, however, was reduced, which contradicts previous bone modeling studies, which we postulate is due to increased posterior capsular tension as it is forced to wrap around a larger 42 mm implant assembly.

Langohr GD ，Giles JW ，Athwal GS ，Johnson JA ... -  《-》

Biomechanical consequences of glenoid and humeral lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

The objective of our study was to quantify the biomechanical effectiveness of lateralization in RTSA with respect to glenoid and humeral component configurations. Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested in a custom shoulder testing system. Three parameters, including the glenosphere thickness, humeral tray offset, and insert thickness, were assessed by implanting 8 configurations on each specimen. Humeral position, maximum internal rotation, and maximum external rotation (ER) before impingement were quantified at 0° and 30° glenohumeral abduction. The adduction angle at which the humeral component contacted the inferior scapular neck and the abduction angle where acromial notching occurred were also measured. The simulated active range of motion, including ER and abduction capability, was tested by increasing the load applied to the remaining posterior cuff and middle deltoid, respectively. Stability was evaluated by the forces that induced anterior dislocation at 30° abduction. The thicker glenosphere affected only lateralization, whereas the centric humeral tray and thicker insert significantly affected humeral lateralization and distalization simultaneously. Greater adduction and ER angles were found in more lateralized humerus. A significant positive correlation between humeral lateralization and ER capability was observed; however, lateralization did not significantly improve implant stability in this cadaveric testing system. Lateralization is achievable at both the glenoid and humeral sides but has different effects; therefore, lateralized implant options should be selected according to patients' needs. Lateralization is an effective strategy for reducing adduction notching while increasing ER capability. Thicker glenospheres only affected humeral lateralization. The centric humeral tray would be selected for less distalization to avoid overlengthening, whereas an eccentric humeral tray is the most effective for distalization and medialization in reducing abduction notching to the acromion and for patients with pseudoparalysis.

Liu B ，Kim YK ，Nakla A ，Chung MS ，Kwak D ，McGarry MH ，Lee TQ ，Oh JH ... -  《-》

Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Scapular notching is a common observation during radiological follow-up of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion on movement amplitude in the scapular plane and inferior scapular impingement. The Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis (Tornier) was implanted into 40 cadaver shoulders. On the glenoid side, 8 different combinations were tested: 36-mm glenosphere: centered (standard), eccentric, with an inferior tilt, or with the center of rotation (COR) lateralized by 5 or 7 mm; and 42-mm centered glenosphere: used alone or with the COR lateralized by 7 or 10 mm. The humeral component was positioned in 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40° of retroversion. Maximum adduction and abduction were measured when inferior impingement and superior impingement, respectively, were detected. The average increase in abduction amplitude was 10° and inferior impingement occurred 18° later with a 42-mm glenosphere, especially when it was lateralized by 10 mm, relative to a 36-mm centered glenosphere (P < .05). These 2 combinations provided a 28° increase in the movement amplitude in the scapular plane. Positioning of the humeral component in 10° or 20° of retroversion or in anatomical retroversion was most effective at avoiding inferior impingement but had less effect on abduction range of motion (except with the 42-mm glenosphere). Our study confirmed published results with various glenosphere designs but was unique in describing the effect of humeral retroversion on scapular impingement. Inferior scapular notching can be most effectively prevented by using large-diameter glenospheres with lateralized COR and by making sure to replicate the patient's native humeral retroversion.

Berhouet J ，Garaud P ，Favard L 《-》