Impact of proximal seal zone length and intramural hematoma on clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissections.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become standard treatment of complicated type B aortic dissections (TBADs). Whereas adequate proximal seal is a fundamental requisite for TEVAR, what constitutes "adequate" in dissections and its impact on outcomes remain unclear. The goal of this study was to describe the proximal seal zone achieved with associated clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling. A retrospective review was performed of TEVARs for TBAD at a single institution from 2006 to 2016. Three-dimensional centerline analysis of preoperative computed tomography was used to identify the primary entry tear, dissection extent, distances between arch branches, and intramural hematoma (IMH) involvement of the proximal seal zone. Patients were categorized into group A, those with proximal extent of seal zone in IMH/dissection-free aorta, and group B, those with landing zone entirely within IMH. Clinical outcomes including retrograde type A dissection (RTAD), death, and aortic reinterventions were recorded. Postoperative computed tomography scans were analyzed for remodeling of the true and false lumen volumes of the thoracic aorta. Seventy-one patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD were reviewed. Indications for TEVAR included malperfusion, aneurysm, persistent pain, rupture, uncontrolled hypertension, and other. Mean follow-up was 14 months. In 26 (37%) patients, the proximal extent of the seal zone was without IMH, whereas 45 (63%) patients had proximal seal zone entirely in IMH. Proximal seal zone of 2-cm IMH-free aorta was achieved in only six (8.5%) patients. Review of arch anatomy revealed that to create a 2-cm landing zone of IMH-free aorta, 31 (43.7%) patients would have required coverage of all three arch branch vessels. Postoperatively, two patients developed image-proven RTADs requiring open repair, and one patient had sudden death. All three of these patients had TEVAR with the proximal seal zone entirely in IMH. No RTADs occurred in patients whose proximal seal zone involved healthy aortic segment. At 24 months, overall survival was 93% and freedom from aorta-related mortality was 97.4%. Complete thoracic false lumen thrombosis was seen in 46% of patients. Aortic remodeling, such as true lumen expansion, false lumen regression, and false lumen thrombosis, was similar in both groups of patients. Whereas achieving 2 cm of IMH-free proximal seal zone during TEVAR for TBAD would often require extensive arch branch coverage, failure to achieve any IMH-free proximal seal zone may be associated with higher incidence of RTAD. The length and quality of the proximal seal zone did not affect the subsequent aortic remodeling after TEVAR.

Kuo EC ，Veranyan N ，Johnson CE ，Weaver FA ，Ham SW ，Rowe VL ，Fleischman F ，Bowdish M ，Han SM ... -  《-》

Volume analysis of true and false lumens in acute complicated type B aortic dissections after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with stent grafts alone or with a composite device design.

This study compared the 12-month evolution of the aortic volume in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with stent grafts alone or a composite device (Zenith TX2 stent graft and Zenith Dissection stent; Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) for acute (≤2 weeks from onset) complicated type B aortic dissection. This was a retrospective analysis comparing prospectively collected data from 45 patients who underwent standard TEVAR repair at three European institutions (TEVAR group) and 39 patients in the Study of Thoracic Aortic type B Dissection using Endoluminal Repair (STABLE I) study who received a composite device (STABLE group). The analysis included consecutive patients treated for acute, complicated type B dissection and with available baseline and 12-month computed tomography imaging. Volume analysis was performed by using a semiautomated centerline algorithm. Baseline demographics, medical history, extent of dissection, and clinical indications were largely similar between the two groups. There was no difference in the length of aorta covered by stent grafts (167 ± 47 mm in STABLE and 184 ± 49 mm in TEVAR; P = .11). The STABLE group had an initial larger false lumen volume in the thoracic (203 ± 72 cm(3) vs 162 ± 74 cm(3); P = .01) and abdominal aorta (63 ± 29 cm(3) vs 36 ± 27 cm(3); P < .001). In the thoracic aorta, each group exhibited a significant increase in true lumen volume and a significant decrease in false lumen volume through 12 months. The total aortic volume increased significantly in the STABLE group (P < .001) but not in the TEVAR group. In the abdominal aorta, only the STABLE group exhibited a significant increase in the true lumen volume (P < .001) and a significant decrease in the false lumen volume (P = .004) postoperatively. At 12 months, the true lumen continued to increase significantly in the STABLE group (P = .03). However, no statistically significant difference was detected when the two groups were compared for the overall changes in the true lumen and false lumen volumes from preprocedure to 12 months, and both groups exhibited a statistically significant increase in total abdominal aortic volume at 12 months. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the proportions of patients who experienced >10% changes in the thoracic or abdominal total lumen volume after TEVAR. Patients in the two groups (all survived 12 months) had similar clinical outcomes, including rupture, conversion, and reinterventions. According to this volume analysis, thoracic endografting for acute complicated type B dissections promotes significant thoracic aortic remodeling. The use of bare-metal dissection stents leads to significant true lumen expansion and false lumen regression in the early follow-up and to subsequent continued true lumen expansion in the abdominal aorta; however, a definitive benefit in aortic remodeling over TEVAR alone was not demonstrated at 1 year.

Sobocinski J ，Lombardi JV ，Dias NV ，Berger L ，Zhou Q ，Jia F ，Resch T ，Haulon S ... -  《-》

Efficacy of intentional undersized thoracic endovascular repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection.

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) is widely used for the treatment of aortic dissection. Endograft oversizing is a risk factor for stent graft-induced new entry tears and retrograde type A aortic dissection. However, there is no clear consensus on the optimal graft size selection for Stanford type B acute or subacute aortic dissection (TBAD). Herein, we examined the safety and efficacy of TEVAR using an intentionally undersized endograft to treat TBAD. This retrospective chart review study included 82 patients who underwent TEVAR for acute or subacute Stanford TBAD between 2015 and 2022. We measured the true lumen diameter just distal to the subclavian artery and opted for a stent graft of the same diameter. In instances where deformation resulting from false lumen pressure displacement was pronounced, we measured the diameter at the site just proximal to the subclavian artery. Patients' characteristics, procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up data, and aortic remodeling were analyzed. The aortic diameter was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test. Survival and freedom from reintervention were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. The follow-up rate was 98.4%. The mean age was 58.3 ± 12.3 years, and 76 were men (92.7%). The mean diameters of the stent graft and native proximal landing zone were 30.9 ± 3.2 mm and 30.8 ± 3.0 mm, respectively. The oversize rate of the stent graft in relation to the native proximal aortic diameter was 0.3% ± 4.7%. In-hospital mortality was observed in one patient, retrograde type A aortic dissection in one patient, distal stent graft-induced new entry tear in zero patients, and type 1a endoleak in 22 patients (26.8%). Type 1a endoleaks, characterized by antegrade false lumen blood flow originating from the primary entry, in 12 patients spontaneously disappeared within 1 year of follow-up. According to aortic remodeling, 59 patients (86.8%) achieved complete aortic remodeling at the aortic arch level and 51 (75.0%) at the eighth thoracic vertebral level. The diameters of the aortic arch and descending aorta were significantly reduced compared with the postoperative measurements (P <.001). Survival rates were 97.5% and 93.6% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Freedom from reintervention was 84.7% and 84.7% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Intentionally undersized TEVAR was safe and achieved acceptable aortic remodeling despite a high rate of type 1a endoleaks. A type 1a endoleak was acceptable as it primarily diminished during the mid-term follow-up.

Naganuma M ，Hayatsu Y ，Tsuruhara R ，Nomura H ，Terao N ，Yamaya K ，Hata M ... -  《-》

Single-center experience with an inner branched arch endograft.

Whereas open repair is the "gold standard" for most aortic arch diseases, a subgroup of patients might benefit from an endovascular approach. The introduction of branched stent grafts with dedicated design to address the challenges of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch has opened an entirely new area of treatment for these patients. We investigated the early outcomes of branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (b-TEVAR) in various types of disease of the aortic arch. A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data from a single center of all consecutive patients treated with b-TEVAR. The indication for elective endovascular repair was consented in an interdisciplinary case conference. All patients were treated with a custom-made inner branched arch endograft with two internal branches (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) and left-sided carotid-subclavian bypass. Study end points were technical success, 30-day mortality, and complications as well as late complications and reinterventions. Between 2012 and 2017, there were 54 patients (38 male; median age, 71 years) treated with diseases of the aortic arch. Indications for therapy involved degenerative aortic arch or proximal descending aortic aneurysms requiring arch repair (n = 24), dissection with or without false lumen aneurysms (n = 26), and penetrating aortic ulcers (n = 4). Forty-three cases (80%) were performed electively and 11 urgently for contained ruptures (n = 3) or symptomatic aneurysms (n = 8) with endografts already available for the patient or with grafts of other patients with similar anatomy. Technical success was achieved in 53 cases (98%). The 30-day mortality and major stroke incidence were 5.5% (3/54) and 5.5% (3/54), respectively; in-hospital mortality was 7.4% (n = 4), and minor strokes (including asymptomatic new cerebral lesions) occurred in 5.5% (n = 3). There were two cases of transient spinal cord ischemia with complete recovery and one of paraplegia. No retrograde type A dissections or cardiac injuries were observed. Three early stent graft-related reinterventions were necessary to correct proximal endograft kinking with type IA endoleak in one patient, a bridging stent graft stenosis in another patient, and false lumen persistent perfusion from dissected supra-aortic vessels in the last patient. Mean in-hospital stay was 14 ± 8 days. During a mean follow-up of 12 ± 9 months, three nonaorta-related deaths and one aorta-related death distal to the arch repair were observed. Treatment of aortic arch diseases with b-TEVAR is feasible and safe with acceptable mortality and stroke rates.

Tsilimparis N ，Detter C ，Law Y ，Rohlffs F ，Heidemann F ，Brickwedel J ，von Kodolitsch Y ，Debus ES ，Kölbel T ... -  《-》

Evaluation of Aortic Zone 2 Proximal Landing Accuracy During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Following Carotid-Subclavian Revascularization.

Choi SHJ ，Yang GK ，Baxter K ，Gagnon J ... -  《-》