Evaluating diagnostic yield of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

来自 PUBMED

作者:

Shah JPham GNZhang JPakanati KRaol NOngkasuwan JHopkins BAnne S

展开

摘要:

Options for imaging for evaluation of pediatric patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL) include computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although both CT and MR imaging provide valuable information in the evaluation of pediatric patients with USNHL, debate remains regarding which imaging modality is most ideal and should be the preferred study for these children. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the diagnostic yield of CT versus MRI in children with USNHL. A multi-institutional retrospective chart review was conducted. Pediatric patients with hearing loss (diagnosis codes 389.00-389.22) seen between 2010 and 2012 at three tertiary care centers were identified. Only patients with USNHL and imaging studies were reviewed and results of CT and MRI for each patient were examined and compared. Cochleovestibular or central nervous system findings known to directly correlate to SNHL were noted as positive findings on imaging. McNemar's test was used to compare patients with positive CT and MRI results. A total of 219 patients between the ages of 0-18 years with USNHL who underwent CT and/or MRI were identified. Imaging abnormalities were found in 41/96 patients who underwent MRI with overall diagnostic yield of 42.7% and 69 of 188 patients who underwent CT with overall diagnostic yield of 36.7%. For patients who underwent both imaging modalities (n = 65), there was no statistically significant difference in positive findings detected by CT vs MRI (p > 0.05). Both CT and MR imaging have similar overall diagnostic yield when used to evaluate children with USNHL. Parents and patients should be counseled regarding cost, test duration, radiation exposure, need for sedation, and diagnostic accuracy associated with each imaging modality and these factors should be considered to select the appropriate diagnostic study.

收起

展开

DOI:

10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.09.003

被引量:

6

年份:

1970

SCI-Hub (全网免费下载) 发表链接

通过 文献互助 平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。

查看求助

求助方法1:

知识发现用户

每天可免费求助50篇

求助

求助方法1:

关注微信公众号

每天可免费求助2篇

求助方法2:

求助需要支付5个财富值

您现在财富值不足

您可以通过 应助全文 获取财富值

求助方法2:

完成求助需要支付5财富值

您目前有 1000 财富值

求助

我们已与文献出版商建立了直接购买合作。

你可以通过身份认证进行实名认证,认证成功后本次下载的费用将由您所在的图书馆支付

您可以直接购买此文献,1~5分钟即可下载全文,部分资源由于网络原因可能需要更长时间,请您耐心等待哦~

身份认证 全文购买

相似文献(277)

参考文献(0)

引证文献(6)

来源期刊

-

影响因子:暂无数据

JCR分区: 暂无

中科院分区:暂无

研究点推荐

关于我们

zlive学术集成海量学术资源,融合人工智能、深度学习、大数据分析等技术,为科研工作者提供全面快捷的学术服务。在这里我们不忘初心,砥砺前行。

友情链接

联系我们

合作与服务

©2024 zlive学术声明使用前必读