Comparative risk of major bleeding with rivaroxaban and warfarin: Population-based cohort study of unprovoked venous thromboembolism.

To assess the association between rivaroxaban and warfarin and major bleeding risk in unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. Using US MarketScan claims from 1/2012-12/2016, we identified patients who had ≥1 primary hospitalization/emergency department visit diagnosis code for an unprovoked VTE, newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin within 30 days after the VTE and ≥12 months of insurance coverage prior to the VTE. Differences in baseline covariates were adjusted using inverse-probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores (residual absolute standardized differences <0.1 achieved for all covariates). Endpoints included any major, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, intracranial, and other bleeds. Patients were followed for up to 12 months or until endpoint occurrence, index oral anticoagulant discontinuation/switch, insurance disenrollment or end of follow-up. We identified 10 489 rivaroxaban and 26 364 warfarin patients with an unprovoked VTE. Upon Cox regression, rivaroxaban reduced patients' hazard of major bleeding by 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8%-42%), gastrointestinal bleeding by 38% (95% CI = 14%-55%), and intracranial hemorrhage by 81% (95% CI = 41%-99%) vs warfarin. No subtype of major bleeding occurred statistically more often in rivaroxaban vs warfarin-treated patients. Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced risk of overall, gastrointestinal, and intracranial major bleeding vs warfarin in unprovoked VTE. No bleeding subtype was significantly more frequent in rivaroxaban patients.

Kohn CG ，Bunz TJ ，Beyer-Westendorf J ，Coleman CI ... -  《-》

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment and prevention of recurrence of venous thromboembolism.

Coleman CI ，Bunz TJ ，Turpie AGG 《-》

Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Frailty predicts poorer outcomes in patients receiving anticoagulation. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in frail patients experiencing venous thromboembolism. Using US MarketScan claims data from January 2012-December 2016, we identified frail patients (using the Johns Hopkins Claims-Based Frailty Indicator score) who had ≥1 primary hospitalization/emergency department visit diagnosis codes for venous thromboembolism, received rivaroxaban or warfarin as their first outpatient oral anticoagulant within 30 days of the index event, and had ≥12 months of insurance prior to the index venous thromboembolism. Differences in baseline covariates between cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity scores. The primary endpoint was the composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding. Patient claims were tracked for up to 12 months after the index venous thromboembolism or until endpoint occurrence oral anticoagulant discontinuation/switch, insurance disenrollment, or end of follow-up. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of 58,089 incident venous thromboembolism patients identified, 6869 (1365 rivaroxaban and 5504 warfarin users) were classified as frail. Rivaroxaban reduced patients' hazard of the composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding (HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.98) and recurrent venous thromboembolism alone (HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.97) compared with warfarin. No significant difference in major bleeding was observed between cohorts (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.61-1.27). Frail patients experiencing a venous thromboembolism and given rivaroxaban experience less recurrent venous thromboembolism, with at least as good bleeding outcomes, as patients prescribed warfarin.

Coleman CI ，Turpie AGG ，Bunz TJ ，Beyer-Westendorf J ... -  《-》

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with provoked venous thromboembolism.

Coleman CI ，Turpie AGG ，Bunz TJ ，Beyer-Westendorf J ... -  《-》

Effectiveness and safety of outpatient rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with a known primary hypercoagulable state.

Screening for primary hypercoagulable states (PHSs) in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients was not mandated in the EINSTEIN trials; and therefore, few patients with a known PHS were available for analysis. We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment of VTE in patients with a known PHS. Using MarketScan claims data from 1/2012-9/2015, we identified adults with a primary diagnosis of VTE during a hospitalization/emergency department visit (the index event), with ≥180-days of continuous insurance coverage prior to the index event, a documented diagnosis for a PHS and newly-initiated as an outpatient on rivaroxaban or warfarin within 30-days of the index VTE. Rivaroxaban and warfarin users were 1:1 propensity-score matched. Balance between cohorts was evaluated by inspecting standardized differences for baseline covariates (<0.1 considered well-balanced). Patients were followed up to 12-months from the index event or until occurrence of an endpoint, switch/discontinuation of index oral anticoagulation or insurance disenrollment. Rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We matched 403 rivaroxaban and 403 warfarin patients with VTE and a known PHS. All baseline covariates had a standardized difference < 0.1. Rivaroxaban use was associated with a non-significant reduction in recurrent VTE (HR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.33-1.49) and major bleeding (HR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.16-1.86) versus warfarin. In routine practice, the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in VTE patients with a known PHS appears to be similar to that observed in the EINSTEIN trial program.

Coleman CI ，Turpie AGG ，Bunz TJ ，Baker WL ，Beyer-Westendorf J ... -  《-》