Olfactory groove and tuberculum sellae meningioma resection by endoscopic endonasal approach versus transcranial approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Intracranial meningiomas such as olfactory groove meningioma (OGM) and tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) arising at the anterior skull base are amenable to surgical resection. Traditionally, this has been achieved by transcranial approaches (TCAs), however, there has been an evolution in an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) within recent years. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if the EEA was superior to the TCA in managing these anterior skull base meningioma based on comparative studies only, and highlight the limitations of the current literature. Searches of seven electronic databases from inception to April 2018 were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 1479 articles identified for screening. Data were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions. A total of 10 comparative studies satisfied criteria for inclusions. Resection by the EEA resulted in significantly less likelihood of worse vision (OR, 0.318; p = 0.039) when compared to TCA in OGM. However, EEA resulted also in significantly greater likelihoods of olfactory loss in OGM (OR, 4.511; p = 0.038) and TSM (OR, 3.075; p = 0.017), and CSF leak (OR, 3.854; p = 0.013) in TSM. In terms of surgical and prognosis outcomes, there was no statistically significant trend in favor of either approach in OGM or TSM. The EEA appears to confer a different postoperative complication profile when compared to the TCA in resecting OGM vs TSM which validates previous case-series comparisons. There is a need for longer-term studies that are larger, prospective, randomized in order to fully elucidate efficacy given slow tendency for progression of meningioma in order to develop a more rigorous approach selection algorithm.

Lu VM ，Goyal A ，Rovin RA 《-》

Pure endoscopic expanded endonasal approach for olfactory groove and tuberculum sellae meningiomas.

The expanded endoscopic endonasal (EEE) approach for the removal of olfactory groove (OGM) and tuberculum sellae (TSM) meningiomas is currently becoming an acceptable surgical approach in neurosurgical practice, although it is still controversial with respect to its outcomes, indications and limitations. Here we provide a review of the available literature reporting results with use of the EEE approach for these lesions together with our experience with the use of the endoscope as the sole means of visualization in a series of patients with no prior surgical biopsy or resection. Surgical cases between May 2006 and January 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients (OGM n=6; TSM n=17) were identified. In our series gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 4/6 OGM (66.7%) and 11/17 (64.7%) TSM patients. Vision improved in the OGM group (2/2) and 8/11 improved in the TSM group with no change in visual status in the remaining three patients. Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred in 2/6 (33%) OGM and 2/17 (11.8%) TSM patients. The literature review revealed a total of 19 OGM and 174 TSM cases which were reviewed. GTR rate was 73% for OGM and 56.3% for TSM. Post-operative CSF leak was 30% for OGM and 14% for TSM. With careful patient selection and a clear understanding of its limitations, the EEE technique is both feasible and safe. However, longer follow-ups are necessary to better define the appropriate indications and ideal patient population that will benefit from the use of these newer techniques.

Khan OH ，Krischek B ，Holliman D ，Klironomos G ，Kucharczyk W ，Vescan A ，Gentili F ，Zadeh G ... -  《-》

Outcomes After Transcranial and Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Tuberculum Meningiomas-A Retrospective Comparison.

Degree of resection and visual outcome are the main concerns in the surgical resection of tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM). In addition to the transcranial approach (TCA), the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been used increasingly. However, the controversy regarding the optimal surgical approach is not clearly resolved. We compared the surgical outcomes of each approach for TSMs from 44 patients receiving EEA and 40 patients receiving TCA in 2 institutions between 2004 and 2015. We analyzed the surgical outcomes and affecting factors for the relapse of tumor and visual outcome. Gross total resection rates and relapse-free survival were not different between the 2 groups; however, the locations of residual or recurred tumor definitely differed. All recurrences in the TCA group were in the sella turcica, whereas residual tumors in EEA group were mainly located at lateral or superior to the clinoid process. The complete or partial improvement rate of visual function in the EEA group was 97.7%, but 9 patients (23.7%) in the TCA group experienced visual deterioration after surgery. EEA and younger age (<55 years) were associated with favorable visual outcome. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in only one case in the EEA group. Surgical approaches do not affect the gross total resection rates, but the locations of residual tumor or recurrence differ according to surgical approaches. EEA is superior to TCA in visual outcome. At least in pure TSMs, the trend seems to be shifting in favor of EEA, considering the huge difference in visual outcome.

Song SW ，Kim YH ，Kim JW ，Park CK ，Kim JE ，Kim DG ，Koh YC ，Jung HW ... -  《-》

The endoscope-assisted supraorbital "keyhole" approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis.

Khan DZ ，Muskens IS ，Mekary RA ，Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH ，Helmy AE ，Reisch R ，Broekman MLD ，Marcus HJ ... -  《-》

Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale meningiomas in a similar cohort of patients.

Bander ED ，Singh H ，Ogilvie CB ，Cusic RC ，Pisapia DJ ，Tsiouris AJ ，Anand VK ，Schwartz TH ... -  《-》