Direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator for cervical cancer treatment: Choosing the optimal shielding material.

To investigate the dose modulation capability of a novel MRI-compatible direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator design with various high-density shielding materials for brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer. The shield materials that have been evaluated are tantalum (Ta), pure tungsten (W), gold (Au), rhenium (Re), osmium (Os), platinum (Pt), iridium (Ir), and W' tungsten alloy (95%W, 3.5%Ni, 1.5%Cu). The recently proposed six-channel DMBT tandem is composed of nonmagnetic tungsten alloy (W') rod with diameter of 5.4 mm and coated with 0.3-mm thick bio-safe plastic sheath. The tandem shielding material can, however, be individually replaced with various other shields to create directional radiation. Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code was used to calculate the three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions in a water phantom for an HDR 192 Ir (mHDR-v2) source inside each DMBT tandem with various shields and a plastic conventional tandem (Con.T). Then, the 3D dose distributions were imported into an in-house-coded inverse planning optimization algorithm to obtain optimal plans for 12 clinical cases chosen at random from the international RetroEMBRACE dataset involving conventional tandem and ring (Con.T&R) applicators. All plans generated by the DMBT tandem and ring (DMBT&R) with the tungsten alloy [DMBT(W')&R] were compared with the corresponding Con.T&R plans, to generate benchmark results. These benchmark results were then considered as reference plans for other shields performances. Plans were normalized to receive the same high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR ) D90 . The D100 , D10 , and V100 for CTVHR , and D2cm3 for organs at risk (OARs) of bladder, sigmoid, and rectum were calculated and compared. Transmission factor (TF), that is, the dose in the backside of the DMBT shield over that in the front opening, at a 5 cm distance, were 36.6%, 34.8%, 31.9%, 28.9%, 27.9%, 26.2%, 26.2%, and 25.5%, for Ta, W', W, Re, Au, Os, Pt, and Ir shields, respectively. On average, the CTVHR values for D100 , V100 , D10 were not significantly different across all DMBT&R shields and the Con.T&R plans (P > 0.219). For the D2cm3 , the benchmark results showed significant reductions (P < 0.03), that is, on average, -8.3% for bladder, -10.7% for rectum, and -10.1% for sigmoid, compared to the Con.T&R plans. However, the various shields showed little improvement from the tungsten alloy (W'), where on average, rectum (bladder) [sigmoid] D2cm3 were reduced by -1.32% (-0.85%) [-1.01%], -1.25% (-0.78%) [-0.91%], -1.22% (-0.75%) [-0.86%], -0.94% (-0.60%) [-0.70%], -0.84% (-0.51%) [-0.59%], and -0.38% (-0.24%) [-0.23%] for Ir, Pt, Os, Au, Re, and W shields, relative to the benchmark W' DMBT plans, respectively. These corresponding values for Ta increased by +0.28% (+0.08%) [+0.25%], respectively. The Ir, Pt, Os, Au, Re, and W shielding materials, respectively, in descending order, lead to better OAR sparing than the DMBT(W')&R plans. However, the amount of improvement is limited and clinically insignificant. This finding suggests that the initial W' shield remains a suitable choice given the proven MR compatibility, for use in MR-guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Safigholi H ，Han DY ，Soliman A ，Song WY ... -  《-》

Direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) for treatment of cervical cancer: A planning study with (192) Ir, (60) Co, and (169) Yb HDR sources.

To evaluate plan quality of a novel MRI-compatible direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator using 192 Ir, 60 Co, and 169 Yb HDR brachytherapy sources, for various cervical cancer high-risk clinical target volumes (CTVHR ). The novel DMBT tandem applicator has six peripheral grooves of 1.3-mm diameter along a 5.4-mm thick nonmagnetic tungsten alloy rod. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to benchmark the dosimetric parameters of the 192 Ir, 60 Co, and 169 Yb HDR sources in a water phantom against the literature data. 45 clinical cases that were treated using conventional tandem-and-ring applicators with 192 Ir source (192 Ir-T&R) were selected consecutively from intErnational MRI-guided BRAchytherapy in CErvical cancer (EMBRACE) trial. Then, for each clinical case, 3D dose distribution of each source inside the DMBT and conventional applicators were calculated and imported onto an in-house developed inverse planning optimization code to generate optimal plans. All plans generated by the DMBT tandem-and-ring (DMBT T&R) from all three sources were compared to the respective 192 Ir-T&R plans. For consistency, all plans were normalized to the same CTVHR D90 achieved in clinical plans. The D2 cm3 for organs at risk (OAR) such as bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, and D90, D98, D10, V100, and V200 for CTVHR were calculated. In general, plan quality significantly improved when a conventional tandem (Con.T) is replaced with the DMBT tandem. The target coverage metrics were similar across 192 Ir-T&R and DMBT T&R plans with all three sources (P > 0.093). 60 Co-DMBT T&R generated greater hot spots and less dose homogeneity in the target volumes compared with the 192 Ir- and 169 Yb-DMBT T&R plans. Mean OAR doses in the DMBT T&R plans were significantly smaller (P < 0.0084) than the 192 Ir-T&R plans. Mean bladder D2 cm3 was reduced by 4.07%, 4.15%, and 5.13%, for the 192 Ir-, 60 Co-, and 169 Yb-DMBT T&R plans respectively. Mean rectum (sigmoid) D2 cm3 was reduced by 3.17% (3.63%), 2.57% (3.96%), and 4.65% (4.34%) for the 192 Ir-, 60 Co-, and 169 Yb-DMBT T&R plans respectively. The DMBT T&R plans with the 169 Yb source generally resulted in the greatest OAR sparing when the CTVHR were larger and irregular in shape, while for smaller and regularly shaped CTVHR (<30 cm3 ), OAR sparing between the sources were comparable. The DMBT tandem provides a promising alternative to the Con.T design with significant improvement in the plan quality for various target volumes. The DMBT T&R plans generated with the three sources of varying energies generated superior plans compared to the conventional T&R applicators. Plans generated with the 169 Yb-DMBT T&R produced best results for larger and irregularly shaped CTVHR in terms of OAR sparing. Thus, this study suggests that the combination of the DMBT tandem applicator with varying energy sources can work synergistically to generate improved plans for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Safigholi H ，Han DY ，Mashouf S ，Soliman A ，Meigooni AS ，Owrangi A ，Song WY ... -  《-》

Direction-modulated brachytherapy for high-dose-rate treatment of cervical cancer. I: theoretical design.

To demonstrate that utilization of the direction-modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) concept can significantly improve treatment plan quality in the setting of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer. The new, MRI-compatible, tandem design has 6 peripheral holes of 1.3-mm diameter, grooved along a nonmagnetic tungsten-alloy rod (ρ = 18.0 g/cm(3)), enclosed in Delrin tubing (polyoxymethylene, ρ = 1.41 g/cm(3)), with a total thickness of 6.4 mm. The Monte Carlo N-Particle code was used to calculate the anisotropic (192)Ir dose distributions. An in-house-developed inverse planning platform, geared with simulated annealing and constrained-gradient optimization algorithms, was used to replan 15 patient cases (total 75 plans) treated with a conventional tandem and ovoids (T&O) applicator. Prescription dose was 6 Gy. For replanning, we replaced the conventional tandem with that of the new DMBT tandem for optimization but left the ovoids in place and kept the dwell positions as originally planned. All DMBT plans were normalized to match the high-risk clinical target volume V100 coverage of the T&O plans. In general there were marked improvements in plan quality for the DMBT plans. On average, D2cc for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were reduced by 0.59 ± 0.87 Gy (8.5% ± 28.7%), 0.48 ± 0.55 Gy (21.1% ± 27.2%), and 0.10 ± 0.38 Gy (40.6% ± 214.9%) among the 75 plans, with best single-plan reductions of 3.20 Gy (40.8%), 2.38 Gy (40.07%), and 1.26 Gy (27.5%), respectively. The high-risk clinical target volume D90 was similar, with 6.55 ± 0.96 Gy and 6.59 ± 1.06 Gy for T&O and DMBT, respectively. Application of the DMBT concept to cervical cancer allowed for improved organ at risk sparing while achieving similar target coverage on a sizeable patient population, as intended, by maximally utilizing the anatomic information contained in 3-dimensional imaging. A series of mechanical and clinical validations are to be followed.

Han DY ，Webster MJ ，Scanderbeg DJ ，Yashar C ，Choi D ，Song B ，Devic S ，Ravi A ，Song WY ... -  《-》

Attention 3D U-NET for dose distribution prediction of high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer: Direction modulated brachytherapy tandem applicator.

Direction Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) enables conformal dose distributions. However, clinicians may face challenges in creating viable treatment plans within a fast-paced clinical setting, especially for a novel technology like DMBT, where cumulative clinical experience is limited. Deep learning-based dose prediction methods have emerged as effective tools for enhancing efficiency. To develop a voxel-wise dose prediction model using an attention-gating mechanism and a 3D UNET for cervical cancer high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment planning with DMBT six-groove tandems with ovoids or ring applicators. A multi-institutional cohort of 122 retrospective clinical HDR brachytherapy plans treated to a prescription dose in the range of 4.8-7.0 Gy/fraction was used. A DMBT tandem model was constructed and incorporated onto a research version of BrachyVision Treatment Planning System (BV-TPS) as a 3D solid model applicator and retrospectively re-planned all cases by seasoned experts. Those plans were randomly divided into 64:16:20 as training, validating, and testing cohorts, respectively. Data augmentation was applied to the training and validation sets to increase the size by a factor of 4. An attention-gated 3D UNET architecture model was developed to predict full 3D dose distributions based on high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and organs at risk (OARs) contour information. The model was trained using the mean absolute error loss function, Adam optimization algorithm, a learning rate of 0.001, 250 epochs, and a batch size of eight. In addition, a baseline UNET model was trained similarly for comparison. The model performance was evaluated on the testing dataset by analyzing the outcomes in terms of mean dose values and derived dose-volume-histogram indices from 3D dose distributions and comparing the generated dose distributions against the ground-truth dose distributions using dose statistics and clinically meaningful dosimetric indices. The proposed attention-gated 3D UNET model showed competitive accuracy in predicting 3D dose distributions that closely resemble the ground-truth dose distributions. The average values of the mean absolute errors were 1.82 ± 29.09 Gy (vs. 6.41 ± 20.16 Gy for a baseline UNET) in CTVHR, 0.89 ± 1.25 Gy (vs. 0.94 ± 3.96 Gy for a baseline UNET) in the bladder, 0.33 ± 0.67 Gy (vs. 0.53 ± 1.66 Gy for a baseline UNET) in the rectum, and 0.55 ± 1.57 Gy (vs. 0.76 ± 2.89 Gy for a baseline UNET) in the sigmoid. The results showed that the mean absolute error (MAE) for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 0.22 ± 1.22 Gy (3.62%) (p = 0.015), 0.21 ± 1.06 Gy (2.20%) (p = 0.172), and -0.03 ± 0.54 Gy (1.13%) (p = 0.774), respectively. The MAE for D90, V100%, and V150% of the CTVHR were 0.46 ± 2.44 Gy (8.14%) (p = 0.018), 0.57 ± 11.25% (5.23%) (p = 0.283), and -0.43 ± 19.36% (4.62%) (p = 0.190), respectively. The proposed model needs less than 5 s to predict a full 3D dose distribution of 64 × 64 × 64 voxels for any new patient plan, thus making it sufficient for near real-time applications and aiding with decision-making in the clinic. Attention gated 3D-UNET model demonstrated a capability in predicting voxel-wise dose prediction, in comparison to 3D UNET, for DMBT intracavitary brachytherapy planning. The proposed model could be used to obtain dose distributions for near real-time decision-making before DMBT planning and quality assurance. This will guide future automated planning, making the workflow more efficient and clinically viable.

Gautam S ，Osman AFI ，Richeson D ，Gholami S ，Manandhar B ，Alam S ，Song WY ... -  《-》

Direction Modulated Brachytherapy for Treatment of Cervical Cancer. II: Comparative Planning Study With Intracavitary and Intracavitary-Interstitial Techniques.

To perform a comprehensive comparative planning study evaluating the utility of the proposed direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator against standard applicators, in the setting of image guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervical cancer. A detailed conceptual article was published in 2014. The proposed DMBT tandem applicator has 6 peripheral grooves of 1.3-mm width, along a 5.4-mm-thick nonmagnetic tungsten alloy rod of density 18.0 g/cm(3), capable of generating directional dose profiles. We performed a comparative planning study with 45 cervical cancer patients enrolled consecutively in the prospective observational EMBRACE study. In all patients, MRI-based planning was performed while utilizing various tandem-ring (27 patients) and tandem-ring-needles (18 patients) applicators, in accordance with the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology recommendations. For unbiased comparisons, all cases were replanned with an in-house-developed inverse optimization code while enforcing a uniform set of constraints that are reflective of the clinical practice. All plans were normalized to the same high-risk clinical target volume D90 values achieved in the original clinical plans. In general, if the standard tandem was replaced with the DMBT tandem while maintaining all other planning conditions the same, there was consistent improvement in the plan quality. For example, among the 18 tandem-ring-needles cases, the average D2cm(3) reductions achieved were -2.48% ± 11.03%, -4.45% ± 5.24%, and -5.66% ± 6.43% for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, respectively. An opportunity may also exist in avoiding use of needles altogether for when the total number of needles required is small (approximately 2 to 3 needles or less), if DMBT tandem is used. Integrating the novel DMBT tandem onto both intracavitary and intracavitary-interstitial applicator assembly enabled consistent improvement in the sparing of the OARs, over a standard "single-channel" tandem, though individual variations in benefit were considerable. Although at an early stage of development, the DMBT concept design is demonstrated to be useful and pragmatic for potential clinical translation.

Han DY ，Safigholi H ，Soliman A ，Ravi A ，Leung E ，Scanderbeg DJ ，Liu Z ，Owrangi A ，Song WY ... -  《-》