International Retrospective Chart Review of Treatment Patterns in Severe Familial Mediterranean Fever, Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Periodic Syndrome, and Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency/Hyperimmunoglobulinemia D Syndrome.
Periodic fever syndrome (PFS) conditions are characterized by recurrent attacks of fever and localized inflammation. This study examined the diagnostic pathway and treatments at tertiary centers for familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), and mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD)/hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome (HIDS).
PFS specialists at medical centers in the US, the European Union, and the eastern Mediterranean participated in a retrospective chart review, providing de-identified data in an electronic case report form. Patients were treated between 2008 and 2012, with at least 1 year of followup; all had clinical and/or genetically proven disease and were on/eligible for biologic treatment.
A total of 134 patients were analyzed: FMF (n = 49), TRAPS (n = 47), and MKD/HIDS (n = 38). Fever was commonly reported as severe across all indications. Other frequently reported severe symptoms were serositis for FMF patients and elevated acute-phase reactants and gastrointestinal upset for TRAPS and MKD/HIDS. A long delay from disease onset to diagnosis was seen within TRAPS and MKD/HIDS (5.8 and 7.1 years, respectively) compared to a 1.8-year delay in FMF patients. An equal proportion of TRAPS patients first received anti-interleukin-1 (anti-IL-1) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents, whereas IL-1 blockade was the main choice for FMF patients resistant to colchicine and MKD/HIDS patients. For TRAPS patients, treatment with anakinra versus anti-TNF treatments as first biologic agent resulted in significantly higher clinical and biochemical responses (P = 0.03 and P < 0.01, respectively). No significant differences in responses were observed between biologic agents among other cohorts.
Referral patterns and diagnostic delays highlight the need for greater awareness and improved diagnostics for PFS. This real-world treatment assessment supports the need for further refinement of treatment practices.
Ozen S
，Kuemmerle-Deschner JB
，Cimaz R
，Livneh A
，Quartier P
，Kone-Paut I
，Zeft A
，Spalding S
，Gul A
，Hentgen V
，Savic S
，Foeldvari I
，Frenkel J
，Cantarini L
，Patel D
，Weiss J
，Marinsek N
，Degun R
，Lomax KG
，Lachmann HJ
... -
《-》
Reasons for canakinumab initiation among patients with periodic fever syndromes: a retrospective medical chart review from the United States.
Although canakinumab has demonstrated efficacy in multiple trials in patients with periodic fever syndromes (PFS), the evidence on initiation of canakinumab among PFS patients in real world setting is not well understood. We aimed to characterize the reasons for canakinumab initiation among patients with PFS, specifically, cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), hyperimmunoglobulin D syndrome/mevalonate kinase deficiency (HIDS/MKD), TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF).
Physicians retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of PFS patients prescribed canakinumab between 2016 and 2018. Information collected included patient clinical characteristics, reasons for previous treatment discontinuation and canakinumab initiation. The results were summarized for overall patients, and by children (< 18 years) and adults and by subtype of PFS.
Fifty-eight physicians in the US (rheumatologists, 44.8 %; allergists/immunologists, 29.3 %; dermatologists, 25.9 %) abstracted information for 147 patients (children, 46.3 %; males, 57.1 %; CAPS, 36.7 %; TRAPS, 26.5 %; FMF, 26.5 %; HIDS/MKD, 6.8 %; Mixed, 3.4 %). Overall, most patients (90.5 %) received treatment directly preceding canakinumab (NSAIDs, 27.8 % [40.0 % in HIDS/MKD]; anakinra, 24.1 % [32.7 % in CAPS]; colchicine, 21.8 % [35.9 % in FMF]), which were discontinued due to lack of efficacy/effectiveness (39.5 %) and availability of a new treatment (36.1 %). The common reasons for canakinumab initiation were physician perceived efficacy/effectiveness (81.0 %; children, 75.0 %; adults, 86.1 %), lack of response to previous treatment (40.8 %; children, 38.2 %; adults, 43.0 %) and favorable safety profile/tolerability (40.1 %; children, 42.6 %; adults, 38.0 %). Within subtypes, efficacy/effectiveness was the most stated reason for canakinumab initiation in HIDS/MKD (90.9 %), lack of response to previous treatment in FMF (52.4 %) and convenience of administration/dosing in CAPS (27.1 %).
This study provided insights into how canakinumab is initiated in US clinical practice among PFS patients, with physician perceived efficacy/effectiveness of canakinumab, lack of response to previous treatment and favorable safety profile/tolerability of canakinumab being the dominant reasons for canakinumab initiation in all patients and in children and adults and PFS subtypes. Notably, the favorable safety profile/tolerability of canakinumab was more often the reason for initiation among children versus adults.
Hur P
，Lomax KG
，Ionescu-Ittu R
，Manceur AM
，Xie J
，Cammarota J
，Gautam R
，Sanghera N
，Kim N
，Grom AA
... -
《Pediatric Rheumatology》
Use of the Auto-inflammatory Disease Activity Index to monitor disease activity in patients with colchicine-resistant Familial Mediterranean Fever, Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency, and TRAPS treated with canakinumab.
To evaluate the feasibility of the autoinflammatory disease activity index (AIDAI) as a tool to assess disease activity in patients with hereditary recurrent fever syndromes (HRFs) treated with canakinumab.
Patients with active colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever (crFMF), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), or tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) were enrolled in the phase III CLUSTER study and asked to complete the AIDAI questionnaire daily. All patients included in the analysis were treated with canakinumab, but regimens and periods of treatment varied per study protocol. The AIDAI for each patient was calculated weekly over the first 40 weeks of study, based on the diaries completed over 30 days. Disease-specific cut-off AIDAI values for inactive disease were calculated in a ROC analysis by comparing AIDAI scores with the occurrence of clinically inactive disease, based on the physician global assessments of disease activity and the occurrence of flares.
Sixty patients with crFMF, 70 with MKD, and 43 with TRAPS were included in the analysis. Median AIDAI scores were high during the first 4 weeks for the three disease cohorts, and decreased afterwards, with some differences between disease cohorts. AIDAI values of 12.0, 9.6 and 15.5 were obtained as the most optimal thresholds to discriminate patients with inactive disease, with sensitivity and specificity values mostly over 75%.
The AIDAI allows to discriminate between patients with active and inactive HRFs, and can be used in clinical practice to monitor the disease course of patients and the effect of medications.
Koné-Paut I
，Piram M
，Benseler S
，Kuemmerle-Deschner JB
，Jansson A
，Rosner I
，Tommasini A
，Murias S
，Karadag O
，Levy J
，McCreddin S
，Migliaccio M
，De Benedetti F
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
