Presence of koilocytosis in low-grade smears of high-risk HPV-positive women is a negative predictor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more.

The Netherlands converted to high-risk (hr)HPV-based screening in 2017. An increase in referral of hrHPV-positive women with low risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more (CIN3+) is anticipated and reduction of unjustified referrals will have priority. The relevance of koilocytosis in relation to the underlying risk of high-grade CIN in a primary HPV screening setting is unclear. The aim was to investigate whether the risk for CIN3+ differs between hrHPV-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US)/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) with or without koilocytosis. Retrospective cohort study, using data from the Dutch national pathology database (PALGA). The population was 1201 hrHPV-positive women with cytological diagnosis of ASC-US/LSIL. Reporting of koilocytosis was assessed as well as detection rates of CIN1 or less, CIN2 and CIN3+ for ASC-US/LSIL cytology stratified by presence or absence of koilocytosis. Crude and adjusted odds ratios were determined. Koilocytosis was present in 40.1% of ASC-US and 45.9% of LSIL cases. CIN3+ is significantly less often found when koilocytosis is present (7.8% for hrHPV-positive ASC-US with- vs 15.8% without koilocytosis). For hrHPV-positive LSIL this was 11.7% vs 20.2%. The crude and adjusted odds ratios for CIN3+ was 0.45 for hrHPV-positive ASC-US and 0.52 for hrHPV-positive LSIL. The presence of koilocytosis is a negative predictor of CIN3+. The risk of hrHPV-positive ASC-US with koilocytosis is in the same range as hrHPV-positive/cytology negative cases and in a setting of primary hrHPV screening these cases could be followed conservatively by repeat cytology. The results should be confirmed by the first data from the Dutch HPV-based screening programme.

Siebers AG ，van der Linden H ，Vedder JEM ，Bekkers RLM ，Melchers WLG ，Bulten J ... -  《-》

Effectiveness of two strategies to follow-up ASC-US and LSIL screening results in The Netherlands using repeat cytology with or without additional hrHPV testing: a retrospective cohort study.

Siebers AG ，Arbyn M ，Melchers WJ ，van Kemenade FJ ，Vedder JE ，van der Linden H ，van Ballegooijen M ，Bekkers RL ，Bulten J ... -  《-》

Triage of LSIL/ASC-US with p16/Ki-67 dual staining and human papillomavirus testing: a 2-year prospective study.

To investigate human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing and p16/Ki-67 staining for detecting cervical intraepithelial grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and CIN3 in women referred to colposcopy with minor abnormal cervical cytology low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and atypical squamous cells of undermined significance (ASC-US). The clinical performance of both tests was evaluated as stand-alone tests and combined, for detection CIN2+ and CIN3 over 2 years. ThinPrep(®) liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens were collected from 1349 women with repeat LSIL or ASC-US. HPV DNA was performed using Hybrid Capture. Where adequate material remained (n = 471), p16/Ki-67 overexpression was assessed. Clinical performance for detection of histologically diagnosed CIN2+ and CIN3 was calculated. Approximately 62.2% of the population were positive for HPV DNA, and 30.4% were positive for p16/Ki-67. p16/Ki-67 showed no significant difference in positivity between LSIL and ASC-US referrals (34.3% versus 28.6%; P = 0.189). Women under 30 years had a higher rate of p16/Ki-67 compared to those over 30 years (36.0% versus 26.6%; P = 0.029). Overall HPV DNA testing produced a high sensitivity for detection of CIN3 of 95.8% compared to 79.2% for p16/Ki-67. In contrast, p16/Ki-67 expression offered a higher specificity, 75.2% versus 40.4% for detection of CIN3. Combining p16/Ki-67 with HPV DNA improved the accuracy in distinguishing between CIN3 and <CIN3. The absolute risk of CIN3 increased from 15.6% in women who were HPV DNA positive to 27% in women positive for HPV DNA and p16/Ki-67. Those negative for HPV DNA and p16/Ki-67 had a low risk of 1.2% of CIN3. The addition of p16/Ki-67 to HPV DNA testing leads to a more accurate stratification of CIN in women presenting with minor cytological abnormalities.

White C ，Bakhiet S ，Bates M ，Keegan H ，Pilkington L ，Ruttle C ，Sharp L ，O' Toole S ，Fitzpatrick M ，Flannelly G ，O' Leary JJ ，Martin CM ... -  《-》

Meta-analysis of the accuracy of p16 or p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry versus HPV testing for the detection of CIN2+/CIN3+ in triage of women with minor abnormal cytology.

Women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) can be triaged accurately with a high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test to identify those who need a referral. However, the triage of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) with hrHPV testing has very low specificity. Overexpression of p16, with or without Ki-67, indicates neoplastic transformation of human papillomavirus-infected cervical cells and may more accurately predict underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 3 or worse (CIN3+). A literature search was conducted in 3 bibliographic databases. Studies were selected if they included women with ASC-US or LSIL who were triaged with dual staining (p16/Ki-67) and/or p16 staining and, if available, with a comparator hrHPV test to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) or CIN3+. Thirty-eight studies were eligible. The sensitivity of p16 staining for CIN3+ was significantly lower than that of hrHPV DNA testing (ratio for ASC-US, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.97; ratio for LSIL, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93). In contrast, the specificity of p16 staining was substantially higher with relative specificities of 1.60 (95% CI, 1.35-1.88) and 2.29 (95% CI, 2.05-2.56) for ASC-US and LSIL respectively. Dual staining was as sensitive as hrHPV DNA testing but was more specific (ratio for ASC-US, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.42-1.92; ratio for LSIL, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.17-2.77). This meta-analysis confirms that p16 staining and p16/Ki-67 staining are more specific for CIN2+/CIN3+ than hrHPV DNA testing. Although p16 staining is less sensitive for CIN3+ than hrHPV DNA testing, dual staining has similar sensitivity.

Peeters E ，Wentzensen N ，Bergeron C ，Arbyn M ... -  《-》

Clinical performance of the aptima HPV assay in 4196 women with positive high-risk HPV and ASC-US cytology: A large women hospital experience.

Despite Aptima assay as the latest US Food Drug Administration (FDA)-approved high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test has been implemented as an adjunct in cervical cancer screening for years, histological follow-up data remain limited with respect to its performance in women with ASC-US Pap tests and positive hrHPV results. Cases with results of ASC-US cytology and positive hrHPV by Aptima assay during the period 06/ 2015-02/2017 were retrieved from archived pathology reports. Immediate histological follow-up results were analyzed within 6 months interval after cotesting. Among 4196 women with ASC-US Pap tests and positive hrHPV, 51.1% of them had the immediate histological follow-up within 6 months. With positive Aptima hrHPV as the adjunct, 46.5% (95%CI 46.2-46.8) of ASC-US women were found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 1 (CIN1); 8.8% (95%CI 8.1-9.5) women were detected CIN2+ lesion including eight adenocarcinoma in-situ (AIS)s. CIN2+ detection rates were highest in women under 25 (15.4%, n = 65), when comparison with different age cutoffs, younger age women had higher CIN2+ lesion detection rate than that in older group (P <.01). This is by far one of the largest retrospective studies to analyze the histological follow-up results of ASC-US women with positive hrHPV tested by Aptima hrHPV mRNA assay. The results indicated that younger women with ASC-US and positive hrHPV testing have highest risk of developing high grade CIN lesions as compared to the older women. Lastly, with positive HPV as the adjunct, 55.3% (1186/2145) of ASC-US women will result in the positive finding on histological follow-up.

Wang T ，Pradhan D ，Zhang H ，Matsko J ，Zhao C ... -  《-》