HLA-Matched Sibling versus Unrelated versus Haploidentical Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients Aged Over 60 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Donor Comparison.
Haploidentical related donor (HRD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was developed as a valid option for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the absence of a matched donor. However, many investigators are reluctant to consider the use of this alternative in elderly patients, anticipating high morbidity. Here, we report a single-center comparison of HRD versus matched sibling donor (MSD) and unrelated donor (UD) allo-HSCT for patients with AML aged ≥60 years. Ninety-four patients (MSD: n = 31; UD: n = 30; HRD: n = 33) were analyzed. The median age was 65 (range, 60 to 73) years. We observed a higher cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after UD allo-HSCT (MSD versus UD versus HRD: 3% versus 33% versus 6%, respectively; P = .006). Two-year cumulative incidence of moderate or severe chronic GVHD was 17%, 27%, and 16% in the MSD, UD, and HRD groups, respectively (P = .487). No difference was observed in the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse or nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (relapse: MSD versus UD versus HRD: 32% versus 25% versus 25%, respectively; P = .411; NRM: MSD versus UD versus HRD: 19% versus 27% versus 24%, respectively; P = .709). At 2 years, progression-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD- and relapse-free survival were 48%, 50%, and 39%, respectively, in the MSD group; 48%, 51%, and 23%, respectively, in the UD group; and 50%, 52%, and 32%, respectively, in the HRD group, without statistically significant differences between the groups. We conclude that HRD allo-HSCT is highly feasible and no less efficient than MSD or UD allo-HSCT in patients with AML aged ≥60 years. Thus, the absence of a HLA-identical donor should not limit the consideration of allo-HSCT for the treatment of AML.
Devillier R
，Legrand F
，Rey J
，Castagna L
，Fürst S
，Granata A
，Charbonnier A
，Harbi S
，d'Incan E
，Pagliardini T
，Faucher C
，Lemarie C
，Saillard C
，Calmels B
，Mohty B
，Maisano V
，Weiller PJ
，Chabannon C
，Vey N
，Blaise D
... -
《-》
Reduced-Intensity Conditioning with Busulfan, Fludarabine, and Antithymocyte Globulin for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from Unrelated or Haploidentical Family Donors in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission.
To investigate the role of antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-containing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from unrelated (UD) or haploidentical family donors (HFD), we conducted a phase 2 trial of 237 patients (age range, 16 to 69 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission. Patients undergoing UD-HCT (n = 93) or HFD-HCT (n = 59) received RIC comprising busulfan, fludarabine, and ATG, 9 mg/kg, whereas those undergoing HCT from matched sibling donors (MSD, n = 85) received myeloablative busulfan and cyclophosphamide conditioning or aforementioned RIC with ATG, 4.5 mg/kg. For graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, cyclosporine and methotrexate were administered. The median follow-up period was 44.7 months after HCT for 161 survivors. For UD-HCT versus HFD-HCT, there were no significant differences in leukemia recurrence, nonrelapse mortality, relapse-free survival, grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD, and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD. Furthermore, when the outcomes of UD-HCT and HFD-HCT were combined and compared with those of MSD-HCT, there were no significant differences in leukemia recurrence (3-year cumulative incidence, 30% versus 29%), nonrelapse mortality (3-year cumulative incidence, 7% versus 8%), relapse-free survival (3-year estimate, 63% versus 63%), and grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD (120-day cumulative incidence, 16% versus 13%). Moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD, however, occurred less frequently in UD/HFD-HCT (2-year cumulative incidence, 22% versus 40%; P = .006). The addition of ATG to conditioning regimen was a significant predictor for less chronic GVHD (subdistribution hazard ratio, .59). In AML in remission, UD/HFD-HCT after ATG-containing RIC achieved leukemia control equivalent to that of MSD-HCT. Despite HLA disparity in UD/HFD-HCT, chronic GVHD occurred less frequently after ATG-containing RIC, suggesting a strong GVHD-modulating effect of ATG.
Lee KH
，Lee JH
，Lee JH
，Kim DY
，Park HS
，Choi EJ
，Ko SH
，Seol M
，Lee YS
，Kang YA
，Jeon M
，Baek S
，Kang YL
，Kim SH
，Yun SC
，Kim H
，Jo JC
，Choi Y
，Joo YD
，Lim SN
... -
《-》
Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Haploidentical versus Matched Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Myeloablative Targeted Busulfan-Based Conditioning for Pediatric Acute Leukemia.
The use of haploidentical related donors (HRDs) is a common alternative donor strategy used when matched sibling or unrelated donors are not available for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there have been no studies comparing HRD HSCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT with antithymocyte globulin using similar busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimens in pediatric acute leukemia. Here we compared the outcomes in children and adolescents with high-risk acute leukemia who underwent HRD HSCT with PTCy (n = 35) or MUD HSCT (n = 45) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning using intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring. The median duration of follow-up was 3.7 years in the HRD group and 4.6 years in the MUD group. No engraftment failure was observed in either group. There were no significant between-group differences in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (34.3% versus 48.9%; P = .142), grade III-IV acute GVHD (2.9% versus 8.9%; P = .272), moderate to severe chronic GVHD (11.4% versus 18.3%; P = .417), relapse (25.6% versus 28.0%; P = .832), and nonrelapse mortality (0% versus 2.2%; P = .420). The 3-year severe chronic GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS) rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 62.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.8% to 80.0%) versus 49.8% (95% CI, 34.9% to 64.7%; P = .318), 74.4% (95% CI, 58.7% to 90.1%) versus 67.5% (95% CI, 53.4% to 81.6%; P = .585), and 88.6% (95% CI, 78.0% to 99.2%) versus 83.7% (95% CI, 72.5% to 94.9%; P = .968), respectively. In a subgroup analysis of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HRD, n = 17; MUD, n = 26), the 3-year GRFS, LFS, and OS rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 49.4% (95% CI, 24.3% to 74.5%) versus 39.5% (95% CI, 19.7% to 59.3%; P = .601), 61.8% (95% CI, 37.5% to 86.1%) versus 63.6% (95% CI, 44.4% to 82.8%; P = .872), and 82.4% (95% CI, 64.4%, 100%) versus 84.2% (95% CI, 70.1% to 98.3%; P = .445), respectively. In patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (HRD, n = 16; MUD, n = 16), the 3-year GRFS, LFS, and OS rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 80.8% (95% CI, 61.2% to 100%) versus 61.9% (95% CI, 37.8% to 86.0%; P = .326), 87.1% (95% CI, 70.2% to 100%) versus 73.9% (95% CI, 51.8% to 96.0%; P = .478), and 93.8% (95% CI, 81.8% to 100%) versus 85.6% (95% CI, 67.0% to 100%; P = .628), respectively. Although the difference was not statistically significant and the number of patients was small, the promising outcomes of HRD HSCT in AML patients were encouraging. Our results demonstrate that HRD HSCT with PTCy using a targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen has outcomes similar to those of MUD HSCT with antithymocyte globulin. HRD HSCT with PTCy could be a feasible option for pediatric high-risk acute leukemia patients who lack an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor.
Hong KT
，Park HJ
，Kim BK
，An HY
，Choi JY
，Kang HJ
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
