Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.
Is there a difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (LBRs) between blastocysts developing on Day 5 (D5) and blastocysts developing on Day 6 (D6) following fresh and frozen transfers?
D5 blastocyst transfers (BTs) present higher clinical pregnancy and LBRs than D6 in both fresh and frozen transfers.
BT is increasingly popular in assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers today. To our knowledge, no meta-analysis has focused on clinical outcomes in both fresh and frozen BT. Concerning frozen blastocysts, one meta-analysis in 2010 found no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes between D5 and D6 BT. Since then, ART practices have evolved particularly with the wide use of vitrification, and more articles comparing D5 and D6 BT cycles have been published and described conflicting results.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of published controlled studies. Searches were conducted from 2005 to February 2018 on MEDLINE and Cochrane Library and from 2005 to May 2017 on EMBASE, Eudract and clinicaltrials.gov, using the following search terms: blastocyst, Day 5, Day 6, pregnancy, implantation, live birth and embryo transfer (ET).
A total of 47 full-text articles were preselected from 808 references, based on title and abstract and assessed utilizing the Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment Scales. Study selection and data extraction were carried out by two independent reviewers according to Cochrane methods. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed on all data (overall analysis) followed by subgroup analysis (fresh, vitrified/warmed, slow frozen/thawed).
Data from 29 relevant articles were extracted and integrated in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the 23 studies that reported clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) as an outcome, including overall fresh and/or frozen ET cycles, showed a significantly higher CPR following D5 ET compared with D6 ET (risk ratio (RR) = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.15-1.39, P < 0.001). For CPR, calculated subgroup RRs were 2.38 (95% CI: 1.74-3.24, P < 0.001) for fresh BT; 1.27 (95% CI: 1.16-1.39, P < 0.001) for vitrified/warmed BT; and 1.15 (95% CI: 0.93-1.41, P = 0.20) for slow frozen/thawed BT. LBR was also significantly higher after D5 BT (overall RR = 1.50 (95% CI: 1.32-1.69), P < 0.001). The LBR calculated RRs for subgroups were 1.74 (95% CI: 1.37-2.20, P < 0.001) for fresh BT; 1.38 (95% CI: 1.23-1.56, P < 0.001) for vitrified/warmed BT; and 1.44 (95% CI: 0.70-2.96, P = 0.32) for slow frozen/thawed BT. Sensitivity analysis led to similar results and conclusions: CPR and LBR were significantly higher following D5 compared to D6 BT.
The validity of meta-analysis results depends mainly on the quality and the number of the published studies available. Indeed, this meta-analysis included no randomized controlled trial (RCT). Slow frozen/thawed subgroups showed substantial heterogeneity.
In regards to the results of this original meta-analysis, ART practitioners should preferably transfer D5 rather than D6 blastocysts in both fresh and frozen cycles. Further RCTs are needed to address the question of whether D6 embryos should be transferred in a fresh or a frozen cycle.
This work was sponsored by an unrestricted grant from GEDEON RICHTER France. The authors have no competing interests to declare.
CRD42018080151.
Bourdon M
，Pocate-Cheriet K
，Finet de Bantel A
，Grzegorczyk-Martin V
，Amar Hoffet A
，Arbo E
，Poulain M
，Santulli P
... -
《-》
Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
Is there an optimal window of time when the transfer of single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts is associated with a maximal live birth rate (LBR)?
Performing a single frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer at 160 ± 4 h post-hCG trigger in modified-natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles was independently associated with a higher LBR as compared to transfers outside this window; however, in natural FET cycles, LBRs were comparable across a wider range of time intervals.
There is compelling evidence for maintaining embryo-endometrial synchrony to optimize clinical outcomes following FETs, which could potentially be achieved by matching the transfer time of an embryo post-ovulation to its developmental age post-oocyte retrieval. For modified-natural cycles, ovulation is widely accepted to occur ∼40 h following the hCG trigger, whilst ovulation following spontaneous LH surge onset is thought to vary from 24 to 56 h.
This is a multicentered retrospective cohort study analyzing 1170 single frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfers following trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) between May 2015 and February 2019. Limiting the analysis to single euploid embryo transfers allowed for a more accurate estimation of the endometrial synchrony factor by controlling for the developmental stage of the embryo (full blastocyst or more advanced) and its genetic composition. LBR per FET was the primary outcome measure.
Patients underwent natural or gonadotrophin-induced preparation of the endometrium, with serial serum oestradiol, LH and progesterone measurements. Optimally timed transfers were predefined as those conducted 120 ± 4 h post-ovulation since biopsy and subsequent cryopreservation of full blastocysts which is usually performed at 116-124 h post-oocyte retrieval. This was considered the equivalent of 160 ± 4 h post-hCG trigger in modified-natural cycles (n = 253), as ovulation was assumed to occur ∼40 h after the hCG trigger. For natural cycles (n = 917), this was also considered to be, on average, 160 ± 4 h post the spontaneous LH surge. Thus, study groups were determined as those with optimal timing or not, and additional exploratory and subgroup analyses were performed, varying the time window in terms of onset and width, both overall and per endometrial preparation protocol. Statistical analysis was performed using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) framework to control for the clustered nature of the data while adjusting for potential confounders.
Overall, LBRs were significantly higher when the transfer had been performed at 160 ± 4 h post-hCG trigger or LH surge onset compared to when it had been performed outside this window (44.7% vs 36.0%; P = 0.008). A multivariable regression GEE model including the cycle type (natural versus modified-natural), previtrification embryo quality (top versus good quality), embryo stage (fully hatched versus hatching or earlier blastocyst), vitrification day (D5 versus D6) and survival rate (>90% versus <90%) as covariates, confirmed that, overall, embryo transfers conducted 160 ± 4 h post-hCG trigger or LH surge onset (the assumed equivalent of 120 ± 4 h post-ovulation) were associated with a significantly higher LBR (relative risk (RR) 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.41). Subgroup exploratory analyses per endometrial preparation protocol demonstrated that these findings were primarily present in the modified-natural cycle group (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.15-1.99), whilst the natural cycle group showed comparable LBRs across a wider range of time intervals. Moreover, the overall LBR for the natural group (36.8%; 95% CI 33.7-39.9%) was lower than that of the modified-natural group (41.3%; 95% CI 35.4-47.1%), suggesting that there likely remains a greater potential to further optimize the timing of natural cycle embryo transfers.
As with all retrospective studies, the presence of residual unknown bias cannot be excluded. Additionally, patients included in this study were a selected group who underwent PGT for specific reasons and hence the results obtained might not be directly applicable to the general population or embryos that have not undergone embryo biopsy. Furthermore, the criteria utilized to interpret hormonal data from natural cycles were specifically adopted for the present study and need to be validated in further studies.
The results of this study highlight the significance of embryo-endometrial synchrony for the optimization of frozen embryo transfer outcome. However, it also clearly supports that the implantation window is in most cases wide and the achievement of live birth is possible with relatively high success rates even outside the optimal window of 160 ± 4 h post-trigger for modified-natural cycles and across a range of time intervals for natural cycles. Additionally, this study suggests that implantation rates could be further optimized in natural cycles by improving methods of assessing embryo-endometrial synchrony.
C. V. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (GNT1147154). No other funding was received for this study and there are no competing interests.
N/A.
An BGL
，Chapman M
，Tilia L
，Venetis C
... -
《-》
Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates.
Does vitrification cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years affect the pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET)?
Vitrification cryopreservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years is associated with a decrease in the implantation rate (IR) and live birth rate (LBR).
Previous studies have predominantly focused on embryos cryopreserved for relatively short durations (less than 5 years), yet the impact of extended cryopreservation duration on pregnancy outcomes remains a controversial issue. There is a relative scarcity of data regarding the efficacy and safety of storing embryos for 5 years or longer.
This retrospective study involved 36 665 eligible vitrified-thawed embryo transfer cycles from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2022, at a single fertility center in China.
Patients were divided into three groups according to embryo storage time: Group 1 consisted of 31 565 cycles, with storage time of 0-2 years; Group 2 consisted of 4458 cycles, with a storage time of 2-5 years; and Group 3 included 642 cycles, with storage time exceeding 5 years. The main outcome measures were IR and LBR. Secondary outcome variables included rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage, as well as neonatal outcomes. Reproductive outcomes were analyzed as binary variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the effect of preservation time on pregnancy outcomes after correcting for confounding factors. In addition, we also assessed neonatal outcomes, such as large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA).
IRs in the three groups (0-2, 2-5, and >5 years) were 37.37%, 39.03%, and 35.78%, respectively (P = 0.017), and LBRs in the three groups were 37.29%, 39.09%, and 34.91%, respectively (P = 0.028). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, compared with the 0-2 years storage group, prolonged embryo vitrification preservation time (2-5 years or >5 years) did not affect secondary outcomes such as rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage (P > 0.05). But cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years reduced the IR (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.97, P = 0.020) and LBR (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91, P = 0.002). Multivariate stratified analysis also showed that prolonging the cryopreservation time of blastocysts (>5 years) reduced the IR (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98, P = 0.033) and LBR (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87, P = 0.002). However, no effect on cleavage embryos was observed (P > 0.05). We further conducted stratified analyses based on the number and quality of frozen blastocysts transferred, and the results showed that the FET results after transfers of good-quality blastocysts in the >5 years storage group were negatively affected. However, the storage time of non-good-quality blastocysts was not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes. Regarding the neonatal outcomes (of singletons), embryo vitrification preservation time had no effect on preterm birth rates, fetal birth weight, or neonatal sex ratios. However, as the storage time increased, rates of SGA (5.60%, 4.10%, and 1.18%) decreased, while rates of LGA (5.22%, 6.75%, and 9.47%) increased (P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, the increase in LGA and the decrease in SGA were significantly correlated with the duration of storage time.
This was a retrospective study using data from a single fertility center, even though the data had been adjusted, our findings still need to be validated in further studies.
With the full implementation of the two-child policy in China, there may be more patients whose embryos have been frozen for a longer time in the future. Patients should be aware that the IR and LBR of blastocysts are negatively affected when the cryopreservation time is longer than 5 years. Couples may therefore consider shortening the time until FET treatment.
This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 82101672), Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (No. 2024A03J0180), General Guidance Program for Western Medicine of Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission (No. 20231A011096), and the Medical Key Discipline of Guangzhou (2021-2023). None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
N/A.
Zhan S
，Lin C
，Lin Q
，Gan J
，Wang C
，Luo Y
，Liu J
，Du H
，Liu H
... -
《-》
Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
How do live birth rates (LBRs), following fresh and vitrified/warmed embryo transfer, compare according to morphological grade, developmental stage and culturing strategy of human blastocysts in vitro?
Equivalent LBRs were obtained after fresh embryo transfer and after vitrified/warmed embryo transfer of blastocysts of top or non-top quality, while vitrification after prolonged embryo culture of blastocysts with delayed development had a positive impact on LBR.
Blastocyst morphology correlates with clinical outcome; however, few data are available on vitrified/warmed embryo transfer using non-top quality blastocysts. The aim of this study was to determine clinical outcomes of non-top quality blastocysts and blastocysts with delayed development that underwent vitrified/warmed embryo transfer.
This retrospective, single-centre study (conducted January 2009 to June 2013) compared 1010 fresh embryo transfer and 1270 vitrified/warmed embryo transfer of blastocysts originating from the same stimulation cycle. Furthermore, 636 fresh embryo transfers and 304 vitrified/warmed embryo transfer after delayed expansion or blastulation in the same period were also analysed.
Clinical outcomes after fresh and vitrified/warmed embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology were compared in both groups.
Similar LBRs after fresh embryo transfer or after vitrified/warmed embryo transfer of top or non-top quality blastocysts were observed. A statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes was obtained after vitrified/warmed embryo transfer of Day 5 embryos with delayed expansion or blastulation when applying prolonged culture. Our study suggests that vitrification of non-top quality blastocysts as well as delayed cavitating and blastulating Day 5 embryos should be considered in autologous IVF cycles.
Given that the present retrospective study used aseptic vitrification of blastocysts, the results, particularly the survival rates, may not be fully applicable to other vitrification protocols. The retrospective nature of the study has to be mentioned.
Restriction of vitrification to top quality blastocysts may result in discarding potentially viable embryos.
This study was not externally funded. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Wirleitner B
，Schuff M
，Stecher A
，Murtinger M
，Vanderzwalmen P
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
