Lumbar loads and trunk kinematics in people with a transtibial amputation during sit-to-stand.

People with a transtibial amputation have numerous secondary health conditions, including an increased prevalence of low back pain. This increased prevalence may be partially explained by altered low back biomechanics during movement. The purpose of this study was to compare trunk kinematics and L4-L5 lumbar loads in people with and without a transtibial amputation during sit-to-stand. Motion capture, ground reaction force and electromyographic data were collected from eight people with a unilateral transtibial amputation and eight people without an amputation during five self-paced sit-to-stand motions. A musculoskeletal model of the torso, lumbar spine, pelvis, lower limbs, and 294 muscles was used in a static optimization framework to quantify L4-L5 loads, low back muscle forces, and trunk kinematics. Participants with an amputation had greater peak and average L4-L5 loading in compression compared to control participants, with peak loading occurring shortly after liftoff from the chair. At the instant of peak loading, participants with an amputation had significantly greater segmental trunk lateral bending and trunk-pelvis axial rotation toward the intact side, and significantly greater segmental trunk axial rotation toward the prosthetic side compared to control participants. Participants with an amputation also had greater peak frontal plane and transverse plane segmental trunk angular velocity. The postural differences observed in people with a transtibial amputation were consistent with their ground reaction force asymmetry. The cumulative effects of the altered movement strategy used by people with an amputation may result in an increased risk for low back pain development over time.

Actis JA ，Nolasco LA ，Gates DH ，Silverman AK ... -  《-》

Development of a multiscale model of the human lumbar spine for investigation of tissue loads in people with and without a transtibial amputation during sit-to-stand.

Honegger JD ，Actis JA ，Gates DH ，Silverman AK ，Munson AH ，Petrella AJ ... -  《-》

Validation of lumbar spine loading from a musculoskeletal model including the lower limbs and lumbar spine.

Low back mechanics are important to quantify to study injury, pain and disability. As in vivo forces are difficult to measure directly, modeling approaches are commonly used to estimate these forces. Validation of model estimates is critical to gain confidence in modeling results across populations of interest, such as people with lower-limb amputation. Motion capture, ground reaction force and electromyographic data were collected from ten participants without an amputation (five male/five female) and five participants with a unilateral transtibial amputation (four male/one female) during trunk-pelvis range of motion trials in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. A musculoskeletal model with a detailed lumbar spine and the legs including 294 muscles was used to predict L4-L5 loading and muscle activations using static optimization. Model estimates of L4-L5 intervertebral joint loading were compared to measured intradiscal pressures from the literature and muscle activations were compared to electromyographic signals. Model loading estimates were only significantly different from experimental measurements during trunk extension for males without an amputation and for people with an amputation, which may suggest a greater portion of L4-L5 axial load transfer through the facet joints, as facet loads are not captured by intradiscal pressure transducers. Pressure estimates between the model and previous work were not significantly different for flexion, lateral bending or axial rotation. Timing of model-estimated muscle activations compared well with electromyographic activity of the lumbar paraspinals and upper erector spinae. Validated estimates of low back loading can increase the applicability of musculoskeletal models to clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Actis JA ，Honegger JD ，Gates DH ，Petrella AJ ，Nolasco LA ，Silverman AK ... -  《-》

Trunk muscle forces and spinal loads in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit activities.

Alterations and asymmetries in trunk motions during activities of daily living, involving lower extremities, are suggested to cause higher spinal loads in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Given the repetitive nature of most activities of daily living, knowledge of the amount of increase in spinal loads is important for designing interventions aimed at prevention of secondary low back pain due to potential fatigue failure of spinal tissues. The objective of this study was to determine differences in trunk muscle forces and spinal loads between persons with and without lower limb amputation when performing sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit tasks. Kinematics of the pelvis and thorax, obtained from ten males with unilateral transfemoral lower limb amputation and 10 male uninjured controls when performing sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit activities, were used within a non-linear finite element model of the spine to estimate trunk muscle forces and resultant spinal loads. The peak compression force, medio-lateral (only during stand-to-sit), and antero-posterior shear forces were respectively 348 N, 269 N, and 217 N larger in person with vs. without amputation. Persons with amputation also experienced on average 171 N and 53 N larger mean compression force and medio-lateral shear force, respectively. While spinal loads were larger in persons with amputation, these loads were generally smaller than the reported threshold for spinal tissue injury. However, a rather small increase in spinal loads during common activities of daily living like walking, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit may nevertheless impose a significant risk of fatigue failure for spinal tissues due to the repetitive nature of these activities.

Shojaei I ，Hendershot BD ，Acasio JC ，Dearth CL ，Ballard M ，Bazrgari B ... -  《-》

Trunk-pelvis motion, joint loads, and muscle forces during walking with a transtibial amputation.

People with unilateral, transtibial amputation (TTA) have an increased prevalence of chronic low back pain (LBP) relative to able-bodied people. However, a definitive cause of increased LBP susceptibility has not been determined. The purpose of this work was to compare dynamic trunk-pelvis biomechanics between people with (n=6) and without (n=6) unilateral TTA during walking using a computational modeling approach. A generic, muscle-actuated whole body model was scaled to each participant, and experimental walking data were used in a static optimization framework to calculate trunk-pelvis motion, L4L5 joint contact forces, and muscle forces within the trunk-pelvis region. Results included several significant between-group differences in trunk-pelvis biomechanics during different phases of the gait cycle. Most significant was greater lateral bending toward the residual side during residual single-limb stance (p<0.01), concurrent with an elevated L4L5 joint contact force (p=0.02) and greater muscle force from the intact-side obliques (p<0.01) in people with TTA relative to able-bodied people. During both double-limb support phases, people with TTA also had a greater range of axial trunk rotation away from the leading limb, concurrent with greater ranges of muscle forces in the erector spinae and obliques. In addition, a greater range of force (p=0.03) in residual-side psoas was found during early residual limb swing in people with TTA. Repeated exposure to atypical motion and joint/muscle loading in people with TTA may contribute to the development of secondary musculoskeletal disorders, including chronic, mechanical LBP.

Yoder AJ ，Petrella AJ ，Silverman AK 《-》