A qualitative study comparing physician-reported barriers to treating addiction using buprenorphine and extended-release naltrexone in U.S. office-based practices.

Our aim was to compare physician-reported barriers to sublingual buprenorphine (BUP) and extended-release naltrexone (XR-NLT) prescribing in U.S. office-based practices, and to identify potential policies for minimizing these barriers. Only one previous qualitative study has examined physician-reported barriers to prescribing XR-NLT and no qualitative study has compared physician-reported barriers between the two medications. Researchers conducted individual semi-structured and in-depth interviews with 20 licensed physicians in four U.S. states between January 2016 and May 2017. Interview questions included general barriers to addiction treatment in office-based settings, barriers specific to BUP and XR-NLT prescribing, and potential government policies to decrease barriers. Researchers conducted thematic analysis of transcribed interviews. They developed and pilot tested a coding template based on a sample of transcripts, independently coded transcripts in Dedoose software, conducted consensus coding to eliminate coding discrepancies, and then assessed data for themes using research questions as a guide. General barriers to office-based OUD treatment included limited physician education, limited insurance reimbursement, stigma, and perceptions of "difficult" patients. Barriers specific to BUP prescribing included regulatory restrictions, liability fears, and restrictions imposed by the criminal justice system. Barriers specific to XR-NLT prescribing included limited access to medically-supervised opioid detoxification, lack of awareness of the medication, and patient fears or disinterest. Participants without experience prescribing either medication emphasized barriers to treating OUD in general. Participants with experience prescribing BUP and/or XR-NLT described barriers to treating OUD in general as well as barriers specific to each medication. Policy makers should increase access to addiction medicine education, mandate insurance coverage of both medications and inpatient detoxification, prohibit excessive insurance prior authorization requirements, increase insurance reimbursement for behavioral healthcare, and incentivize interdisciplinary collaboration. While overlap exists, some barriers to BUP prescribing differ from barriers to XR-NLT prescribing.

Andraka-Christou B ，Capone MJ 《-》

A mixed-method comparison of physician-reported beliefs about and barriers to treatment with medications for opioid use disorder.

Haffajee RL ，Andraka-Christou B ，Attermann J ，Cupito A ，Buche J ，Beck AJ ... -  《Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy》

Perceptions of extended-release naltrexone, methadone, and buprenorphine treatments following release from jail.

Velasquez M ，Flannery M ，Badolato R ，Vittitow A ，McDonald RD ，Tofighi B ，Garment AR ，Giftos J ，Lee JD ... -  《-》

Perceptions of extended-release buprenorphine among people who received medication for opioid use disorder in jail: a qualitative study.

Incarceration provides an opportunity for health interventions, including opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and prevention of opioid-related overdoses post-release. All FDA-approved forms of medication for OUD (MOUD) treatment were mandated in several Massachusetts jails in 2019, with some jails offering extended-release buprenorphine (XR-Bup). Little is known about patient perspectives on and experiences with XR-Bup in carceral settings. We conducted semi-structured interviews in 2022 with community-dwelling people who received MOUD during a recent incarceration in a Massachusetts jail. We asked participants about their experiences with and perspectives on XR-Bup while in jail. Qualitative data were double-coded deductively and reviewed inductively to identify emergent themes, which were structured using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Participants (n = 38) had a mean age of 41.5 years, were 86% male, 84% White, 24% Hispanic, and 95% continued to receive MOUD at the time of their interview, including 11% receiving XR-Bup. Participants who viewed XR-Bup favorably appreciated avoiding the taste of sublingual buprenorphine; avoiding procedural difficulties and indignities associated with daily dosing in carceral settings (e.g., mouth checks, stigmatizing treatment from correctional staff); avoiding daily reminders of their addiction; experiencing less withdrawal; having extra time for other activities, such as work; and reduction of diversion of MOUD within the jail setting. Participants who viewed XR-Bup less favorably preferred to maintain their daily dosing routine; liked daily time out of their housing unit; wanted to know what was "going into my body everyday"; and feared needles and adverse events. Participants also reported that jail clinicians used XR-Bup for patients who were previously caught diverting sublingual buprenorphine, suggesting limited patient participation in decision-making around XR-Bup initiation in some jails. People who received MOUD in Massachusetts jails had both favorable and unfavorable views and experiences with XR-Bup. Understanding these preferences can inform protocols in jails that are considering implementation of XR-Bup treatment.

Stopka TJ ，Rottapel R ，Friedmann PD ，Pivovarova E ，Evans EA ... -  《-》

Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone and sublingual buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder among Medicaid patients.

Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) and sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) are both approved for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in any medical setting. We aimed to compare the real-world effectiveness of XR-NTX and SL-BUP. This was an observational active comparator, new user cohort study of Medicaid claims records for patients in New Jersey and California, USA, 2016-19. The participants were adult Medicaid patients aged 18-64 years who initiated XR-NTX or SL-BUP for maintenance treatment of OUD and did not use medications for OUD in the 90 days before initiation. Our cohort included 1755 XR-NTX and 9886 SL-BUP patients. We examined two outcomes up to 180 days after medication initiation: (1) composite of medication discontinuation and death and (2) composite of overdose and death. In adjusted analyses, treatment with XR-NTX was more likely to result in discontinuation or death by the end of follow-up than treatment with SL-BUP: cumulative risk 75.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 73.9%, 77.9%] versus 62.2% (95% CI = 61.2%, 63.2%), respectively (risk difference = 13.7 percentage points, 95% CI = 11.4, 16.0). There was minimal difference in the cumulative risk of overdose or death by the end of follow-up: XR-NTX 3.9% (95% CI = 3.0%, 4.8%) versus SL-BUP 3.3% (95% CI = 2.9%, 3.7%); risk difference = 0.5 percentage points, 95% CI = -0.4, 1.5. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Medicaid patients in California and New Jersey, USA, receiving treatment for opioid use disorder stayed in treatment longer on sublingual buprenorphine than on extended-release naltrexone, but the risk of overdose was similar. Most patients in this study discontinued medication within 6 months, regardless of which medication was initiated.

Ross RK ，Nunes EV ，Olfson M ，Shulman M ，Krawczyk N ，Stuart EA ，Rudolph KE ... -  《-》