Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Southern China: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2000-2015.
In January 2016, a universal two-child policy was introduced in China. The association of interpregnancy interval (IPI) with perinatal outcomes has not previously been assessed among Chinese population. We investigated the effect of IPI after live birth on the risks of preterm delivery, and small, and large for gestational age births in China.
We conducted a cohort study among 227 352 Chinese women with their first and second delivery during 2000 to 2015. IPI was calculated as months from first live delivery to conception of the second pregnancy. Poisson regression models with robust variance were fit to evaluate associations of IPI with risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, adjusted for potential confounders.
Compared to IPI of 24- <30 months, IPI <18 months was associated with higher risks of preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA). For IPI <6 months, the adjusted relative risks (RR) for PTB and SGA were 2.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83, 2.27) and 1.43 (95% CI 1.31, 1.57), respectively. Women with IPI ≥60 months had higher risks of PTB and large for gestational age (LGA). For IPI ≥120 months, the adjusted RRs for PTB and LGA were 1.67 (95% CI 1.43, 1.94) and 1.10 (95% CI 0.97, 1.26).
Women with IPI <18 months after live birth had higher risk of PTB and SGA, and IPI ≥60 months was associated with higher risk of PTB and LGA. These findings may provide information to Chinese couples about the appropriate interpregnancy interval for a second pregnancy.
Zhang L
,Shen S
,He J
,Chan F
,Lu J
,Li W
,Wang P
,Lam KBH
,Mol BWJ
,Yeung SLA
,Xia H
,Schooling CM
,Qiu X
... -
《-》
Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.
We assessed whether interpregnancy interval (IPI) length after live birth and after pregnancy termination was associated with preterm birth (PTB).
Multiyear birth cohort.
Fetal death, birth and infant death certificates in California merged with Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
One million California live births (2007-10) after live birth and after pregnancy termination.
Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of PTB of 20-36 weeks of gestation and its subcategories for IPIs after a live birth and after a pregnancy termination. We used conditional logistic regression (two IPIs/mother) to investigate associations within mothers.
PTB relative to gestations of ≥ 37 weeks.
Analyses included 971 211 women with IPI after live birth, and 138 405 women with IPI after pregnancy termination with 30.6% and 74.6% having intervals of <18 months, respectively. IPIs of <6 months or 6-11 months after live birth showed increased odds of PTB adjusted ORs for PTB of 1.71 (95% CI 1.65-1.78) and 1.20 (95% CI 1.16-1.24), respectively compared with intervals of 18-23 months. An IPI >36 months (versus 18-23 months) was associated with increased odds for PTB. Short IPI after pregnancy termination showed a decreased OR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.94). The within-mother analysis showed the association of increased odds of PTB for short IPI, but not for long IPI.
Women with IPI <1 or >3 years after a live birth were at increased odds of PTB-an important group for intervention to reduce PTB. Short IPI after pregnancy termination was associated with reduced odds for PTB and needs to be further explored.
Short and long IPI after live birth, but not after pregnancy termination, showed increased odds for PTB.
Shachar BZ
,Mayo JA
,Lyell DJ
,Baer RJ
,Jeliffe-Pawlowski LL
,Stevenson DK
,Shaw GM
... -
《-》
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes among subsequent twin pregnancies: a nationwide population-based study.
The existing evidence on the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and pregnancy outcomes primarily focuses on singleton pregnancies, with limited research on twin pregnancies.
This study aimed to investigate the association between IPI and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies.
This population-based, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the National Center for Health Statistics in the United States between 2016 and 2020. We included multiparous women aged 18 to 45 years with live-born twins without congenital anomalies, born between 26 and 42 weeks of gestation. Poisson regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used to evaluate the associations between IPI and adverse outcomes, including preterm birth (PTB) <36 weeks, small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal composite morbidity, and infant death. Missing data on covariates were managed using multiple imputations. Dose-response analyses were performed using the restricted cubic splines (RCS) approach. Subgroup analyses were stratified by maternal age, parity, and combination of neonatal sex. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using complete data and excluding pregnancies with intervening events during the IPI.
A total of 143,014 twin pregnancies were included in the analysis. Compared to the referent group (IPI of 18-23 months), an IPI of less than 6 months was associated with an increased risk of PTB<36 weeks (RR, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.17-1.25), SGA (RR, 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03-1.18), neonatal composite morbidity (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.12-1.27), NICU admission (RR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.14-1.22), and infant death (RR, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.05-1.60). An IPI of 5 years or more was associated with an increased risk of PTB<36 weeks (RR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.15-1.21), SGA (RR, 1.24; 95% CI: 1.18-1.30), neonatal composite morbidity (RR, 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15), and NICU admission (RR, 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11-1.17). The dose-response analyses showed that these outcomes had U-shaped or J-shaped associations with IPI. The associations between IPI and the outcomes slightly differed by advanced maternal age, parity, and combination of neonatal sex. The sensitivity analyses yielded similar results to the main findings.
Extreme IPI, less than 6 months or more than 5 years, was associated with adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies. IPI could be used as a predictor for risk stratification in high-risk twin pregnancies.
Ye S
,Huang X
,Fan D
,Chen G
,Li P
,Rao J
,Zhou Z
,Guo X
,Liu Z
,Lin D
... -
《-》
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008-2016): A cohort study.
The World Health Organization recommends to wait at least 6 months after miscarriage and induced abortion before becoming pregnant again to avoid complications in the next pregnancy, although the evidence-based underlying this recommendation is scarce. We aimed to investigate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes-preterm birth (PTB), spontaneous PTB, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, large for gestational age (LGA) birth, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)-by interpregnancy interval (IPI) for births following a previous miscarriage or induced abortion.
We conducted a cohort study using a total of 49,058 births following a previous miscarriage and 23,707 births following a previous induced abortion in Norway between 2008 and 2016. We modeled the relationship between IPI and 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes separately for births after miscarriages and births after induced abortions. We used log-binomial regression to estimate unadjusted and adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the adjusted model, we included maternal age, gravidity, and year of birth measured at the time of the index (after interval) births. In a sensitivity analysis, we further adjusted for smoking during pregnancy and prepregnancy body mass index. Compared to births with an IPI of 6 to 11 months after miscarriages (10.1%), there were lower risks of SGA births among births with an IPI of <3 months (8.6%) (aRR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.92, p < 0.01) and 3 to 5 months (9.0%) (aRR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.97, p = 0.01). An IPI of <3 months after a miscarriage (3.3%) was also associated with lower risk of GDM (aRR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96, p = 0.01) as compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (4.5%). For births following an induced abortion, an IPI <3 months (11.5%) was associated with a nonsignificant but increased risk of SGA (aRR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.36, p = 0.07) as compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (10.0%), while the risk of LGA was lower among those with an IPI 3 to 5 months (8.0%) (aRR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.98, p = 0.03) compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (9.4%). There was no observed association between adverse pregnancy outcomes with an IPI >12 months after either a miscarriage or induced abortion (p > 0.05), with the exception of an increased risk of GDM among women with an IPI of 12 to 17 months (5.8%) (aRR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.40, p = 0.02), 18 to 23 months (6.2%) (aRR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.50, p = 0.03), and ≥24 months (6.4%) (aRR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.34, p = 0.10) compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (4.5%) after a miscarriage. Inherent to retrospective registry-based studies, we did not have information on potential confounders such as pregnancy intention and health-seeking bahaviour. Furthermore, we only had information on miscarriages that resulted in contact with the healthcare system.
Our study suggests that conceiving within 3 months after a miscarriage or an induced abortion is not associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In combination with previous research, these results suggest that women could attempt pregnancy soon after a previous miscarriage or induced abortion without increasing perinatal health risks.
Tessema GA
,Håberg SE
,Pereira G
,Regan AK
,Dunne J
,Magnus MC
... -
《-》