Intratumoral immunotherapy: using the tumor as the remedy.

Immune checkpoint-targeted monoclonal antibodies directed at Programmed Death Receptor 1 (PD-1), Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4) are currently revolutionizing the prognosis of many cancers. By blocking co-inhibitory receptors expressed by antitumor T cells, these antibodies can break the immune tolerance against tumor cells and allow the generation of durable cancer immunity. Benefits in overall survival over conventional therapies have been demonstrated for patients treated with these immunotherapies, leading to multiple approvals of such therapies by regulatory authorities. However, only a minority of patients develop an objective tumor response with long-term survival benefits. Moreover, the systemic delivery of immunotherapies can be responsible for severe auto-immune toxicities. This risk increases dramatically with anti-PD(L)1 and anti-CTLA-4 combinations and currently hampers the development of triple combination immunotherapies. In addition, the price of these novel treatments is probably too high to be reimbursed by health insurances for all the potential indications where immunotherapy has shown activity (i.e. in more than 30 different cancer types). Intratumoral immunotherapy is a therapeutic strategy which aims to use the tumor as its own vaccine. Upon direct injections into the tumor, a high concentration of immunostimulatory products can be achieved in situ, while using small amounts of drugs. Local delivery of immunotherapies allows multiple combination therapies, while preventing significant systemic exposure and off-target toxicities. Despite being uncertain of the dominant epitopes of a given cancer, one can therefore trigger an immune response against the relevant neo-antigens or tumor-associated antigens without the need for their characterization. Such immune stimulation can induce a strong priming of the cancer immunity locally while generating systemic (abscopal) tumor responses, thanks to the circulation of properly activated antitumor immune cells. While addressing many of the current limitations of cancer immunotherapy development, intratumoral immunotherapy also offers a unique opportunity to better understand the dynamics of cancer immunity by allowing sequential and multifocal biopsies at every tumor injection.

Marabelle A ，Tselikas L ，de Baere T ，Houot R ... -  《-》

Intratumoral Immunotherapy: From Trial Design to Clinical Practice.

Systemic immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade targeted at PD(L)1 and CTLA4 have demonstrated their ability to provide durable tumor responses and long-term overall survival benefits for some patients in several solid tumor types. However, a majority of patients remain resistant to these treatments and a significant proportion of them develop severe autoimmune and inflammatory adverse events. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that intratumoral injections of immunostimulatory products (oncolytics, pattern recognition receptor agonists,…) that are able to trigger type I IFN release and enhance tumor antigen presentation on immune cells could generate a strong antitumor immunity and overcome the resistance to systemic immune checkpoint blockade therapies. The intratumoral immunotherapy strategies that are currently in clinical development offer a unique therapeutic and exploratory setting to better understand the immune contexture across tumor lesions of patients with metastatic cancer. Also these local therapeutic products could turn cold tumors into hot and improve the response rates to cancer immunotherapies while diminishing their systemic exposure and toxicities. Intratumoral immunotherapies could prime or boost the immunity against tumors and therefore radically change the combinatorial therapeutic strategies currently pursued for metastatic and local cancers to improve their long-term survival. We aimed to review and discuss the scientific rationale for intratumoral immunotherapy, the challenges raised by this strategy in terms of drug development within clinical trials and the current state-of-the-art regarding the clinical practice of this innovative approach.

Champiat S ，Tselikas L ，Farhane S ，Raoult T ，Texier M ，Lanoy E ，Massard C ，Robert C ，Ammari S ，De Baère T ，Marabelle A ... -  《-》

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies.

Despite extensive investigation over the past three decades, cancer immunotherapy has produced limited success, with few agents achieving approval by the Food and Drug Administration and even the most effective helping only a minority of patients, primarily with melanoma or renal cancer. In recent years, immune checkpoints that maintain physiologic self-tolerance have been implicated in the down-regulation of anti-tumor immunity. Efforts to restore latent anti-tumor immunity have focused on antibody-based interventions targeting CTL antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T lymphocytes and its principal ligand (PD-L1) on tumor cells. Ipilimumab, an antibody targeting CTLA-4, appears to restore tumor immunity at the priming phase, whereas anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies restore immune function in the tumor microenvironment. Although ipilimumab can produce durable long-term responses in patients with advanced melanoma, it is associated with significant immune-related toxicities. By contrast, antibodies targeting either PD-1 or PD-L1 have produced significant anti-tumor activity with considerably less toxicity. Activity was seen in patients with melanoma and renal cancer, as well as those with non-small-cell lung, bladder and head and neck cancers, tumors not previously felt to be sensitive to immunotherapy. The tolerability of PD-1-pathway blockers and their unique mechanism of action have made them ideal backbones for combination regimen development. Combination approaches involving cytotoxic chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, alternative immune-checkpoint inhibitors, immunostimulatory cytokines and cancer vaccines are currently under clinical investigation. Current efforts focus on registration trials of single agents and combinations in various diseases and disease settings and identifying predictive biomarkers of response.

Philips GK ，Atkins M 《-》

The Evolving Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment.

Traditional treatment modalities for advanced cancer (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or targeted agents) act directly on tumors to inhibit or destroy them. Along with surgery, these modalities are predominantly palliative, with toxicity and only modest improvements in survival in patients with advanced solid tumors. Accordingly, long-term survival rates for most patients with advanced cancer remain low, thus there is a need for cancer treatments with favorable benefit and toxicity profiles that can potentially result in long-term survival. The immune system plays a critical role in the recognition and eradication of tumor cells ("immune surveillance"), and immunotherapies based on this concept have been used for decades with some success against a few tumor types; however, most immunotherapies were limited by a lack of either substantial efficacy or specificity, resulting in toxicity. We now have a greater understanding of the complex interactions between the immune system and tumors and have identified key molecules that govern these interactions. This information has revitalized the interest in immunotherapy as an evolving treatment modality using immunotherapeutics designed to overcome the mechanisms exploited by tumors to evade immune destruction. Immunotherapies have potentially complementary mechanisms of action that may allow them to be combined with other immunotherapeutics, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or other traditional therapies. This review discusses the concepts and data behind immunotherapies, with a focus on the checkpoint inhibitors and their responses, toxicities, and potential for long-term survival, and explores promising single-agent and combination therapies in development. Immunotherapy is an evolving treatment approach based on the role of the immune system in eradicating cancer. An example of an immunotherapeutic is ipilimumab, an antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) to augment antitumor immune responses. Ipilimumab is approved for advanced melanoma and induced long-term survival in a proportion of patients. The programmed death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors are promising immunotherapies with demonstrated sustained antitumor responses in several tumors. Because they harness the patient's own immune system, immunotherapies have the potential to be a powerful weapon against cancer.

Pennock GK ，Chow LQ 《-》

Nanoscale Metal-Organic Frameworks for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Cancer immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBI), has revolutionized the treatment of some cancers by reactivating the antitumor immunity of hosts with durable response and manageable toxicity. However, many cancer patients with low tumor antigen exposure and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments do not respond to CBI. A variety of methods have been investigated to reverse immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments and turn "cold" tumors "hot" with the goal of extending the therapeutic benefits of CBI to a broader population of cancer patients. Immunostimulatory adjuvant treatments, such as cancer vaccines, photodynamic therapy (PDT), radiotherapy (RT), radiotherapy-radiodynamic therapy (RT-RDT), and chemodynamic therapy (CDT), promote antigen presentation and T cell priming and, when used in combination with CBI, reactivate and sustain systemic antitumor immunity. Cancer vaccines directly provide tumor antigens, while immunoadjuvant therapies such as PDT, RT, RT-RDT, and CDT kill cancer cells in an immunogenic fashion to release tumor antigens . Direct administration of tumor antigens or indirect intratumoral immunoadjuvant therapies as cancer vaccines initiate the immuno-oncology cycle for antitumor immune response.With the rapid growth of cancer nanotechnology in the past two decades, a large number of nanoparticle platforms have been studied, and some nanomedicines have been translated into clinical trials. Nanomedicine provides a promising strategy to enhance the efficacy of immunoadjuvant therapies to potentiate cancer immunotherapy. Among these nanoparticle platforms, nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (nMOFs) have emerged as a unique class of porous hybrid nanomaterials with metal cluster secondary building units and organic linkers. With molecular modularity, structural tunability, intrinsic porosity, tunable stability, and biocompatibility, nMOFs are ideally suited for biomedical applications, particularly cancer treatments.In this Account, we present recent breakthroughs in the design of nMOFs as nanocarriers for cancer vaccine delivery and as nanosensitizers for PDT, CDT, RT, and RT-RDT. The versatility of nMOFs allows them to be fine-tuned to effectively load tumor antigens and immunoadjuvants as cancer vaccines and significantly enhance the local antitumor efficacy of PDT, RT, RT-RDT, and CDT generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) for cancer vaccination. These nMOF-based treatments are further combined with cancer immunotherapies to elicit systemic antitumor immunity. We discuss novel strategies to enhance light tissue penetration and overcome tumor hypoxia in PDT, to increase energy deposition and ROS diffusion in RT, to combine the advantages of PDT and RT to enable RT-RDT, and to trigger CDT by hijacking aberrant metabolic processes in tumors. Loading nMOFs with small-molecule drugs such as an indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitor, the toll-like receptor agonist imiquimod, and biomacromolecules such as CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and anti-CD47 antibody synergizes with nMOF-based radical therapies to enhance their immunotherapeutic effects. Further combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors activates systemic antitumor immune responses and elicits abscopal effects. With structural and compositional tunability, nMOFs are poised to provide a new clinically deployable nanotechnology platform to promote immunostimulatory tumor microenvironments by delivering cancer vaccines, mediating PDT, enhancing RT, enabling RT-RDT, and catalyzing CDT and potentiate cancer immunotherapy.

Ni K ，Luo T ，Nash GT ，Lin W ... -  《-》