Surgical resident technical skill self-evaluation: increased precision with training progression.

Surgical resident ability to accurately evaluate one's own skill level is an important part of educational growth. We aimed to determine if differences exist between self and observer technical skill evaluation of surgical residents performing a single procedure. We prospectively enrolled 14 categorical general surgery residents (six post-graduate year [PGY] 1-2, three PGY 3, and five PGY 4-5). Over a 6-month period, following each laparoscopic cholecystectomy, residents and seven faculty each completed the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS). Spearman's coefficient was calculated for three groups: senior (PGY 4-5), PGY3, and junior (PGY 1-2). Rho (ρ) values greater than 0.8 were considered well correlated. Of the 125 paired assessments (resident-faculty each evaluating the same case), 58 were completed for senior residents, 54 for PGY3 residents, and 13 for junior residents. Using the mean from all OSATS categories, trainee self-evaluations correlated well to faculty (senior ρ 0.97, PGY3 ρ 0.9, junior ρ 0.9). When specific OSATS categories were analyzed, junior residents exhibited poor correlation in categories of respect for tissue (ρ -0.5), instrument handling (ρ 0.71), operative flow (ρ 0.41), use of assistants (ρ 0.05), procedural knowledge (ρ 0.32), and overall comfort with the procedure (ρ 0.73). PGY3 residents lacked correlation in two OSATS categories, operative flow (ρ 0.7) and procedural knowledge (ρ 0.2). Senior resident self-evaluations exhibited strong correlations to observers in all areas. Surgical residents improve technical skill self-awareness with progressive training. Less-experienced trainees have a tendency to over-or-underestimate technical skill.

Quick JA ，Kudav V ，Doty J ，Crane M ，Bukoski AD ，Bennett BJ ，Barnes SL ... -  《-》

Assessing residents' operative skills for external ventricular drain placement and shunt surgery in pediatric neurosurgery.

《-》

Use of a formal assessment instrument for evaluation of resident operative skills in pediatric neurosurgery.

Hadley C ，Lam SK ，Briceño V ，Luerssen TG ，Jea A ... -  《-》

Surgical Simulation: Markers of Proficiency.

Surgical simulation has become an integral component of surgical training. Simulation proficiency determination has been traditionally based upon time to completion of various simulated tasks. We aimed to determine objective markers of proficiency in surgical simulation by comparing novel assessments with conventional evaluations of technical skill. Categorical general surgery residents completed 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomy modules using a high-fidelity simulator. We recorded and analyzed simulation task times, as well as number of hand movements, instrument path length, instrument acceleration, and participant affective engagement during each simulation. Comparisons were made to Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones, as well as previous laparoscopic experience, duration of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by participants, and postgraduate year. Comparisons were also made to Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery task times. Spearman's rho was utilized for comparisons, significance set at >0.50. University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, an academic tertiary care facility. Fourteen categorical general surgery residents (postgraduate year 1-5) were prospectively enrolled. One hundred forty simulations were included. The number of hand movements and instrument path lengths strongly correlated with simulation task times (ρ 0.62-0.87, p < 0.0001), FLS task completion times (ρ 0.50-0.53, p < 0.0001), and prior real-world laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience (ρ -0.51 to -0.53, p < 0.0001). No significant correlations were identified between any of the studied markers with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill evaluations, total previous laparoscopic experience, or postgraduate year level. Neither instrument acceleration nor participant engagement showed significant correlation with any of the conventional markers of real-world or simulation skill proficiency. Simulation proficiency, measured by instrument and hand motion, is more representative of simulation skill than simulation task time, instrument acceleration, or participant engagement.

Binkley J ，Bukoski AD ，Doty J ，Crane M ，Barnes SL ，Quick JA ... -  《-》

Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship.

Preparatory training for new trainees beginning residency has been used by a variety of programs across the country. To improve the clinical orientation process for our new postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents, we developed an intensive preparatory training curriculum inclusive of cognitive and procedural skills, training activities considered essential for early PGY-1 clinical management. We define our surgical PGY-1 Boot Camp as preparatory simulation-based training implemented at the onset of internship for introduction of skills necessary for basic surgical patient problem assessment and management. This orientation process includes exposure to simulated patient care encounters and technical skills training essential to new resident education. We report educational results of 4 successive years of Boot Camp training. Results were analyzed to determine if performance evidenced at onset of training was predictive of later educational outcomes. Learners were PGY-1 residents, in both categorical and preliminary positions, at our medium-sized surgical residency program. Over a 4-year period, from July 2007 to July 2010, all 30 PGY-1 residents starting surgical residency at our institution underwent specific preparatory didactic and skills training over a 9-week period. This consisted of mandatory weekly 1-hour and 3-hour sessions in the Simulation Center, representing a 4-fold increase in time in simulation laboratory training compared with the remainder of the year. Training occurred in 8 procedural skills areas (instrument use, knot-tying, suturing, laparoscopic skills, airway management, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, central venous catheter, and chest tube insertion) and in simulated patient care (shock, surgical emergencies, and respiratory, cardiac, and trauma management) using a variety of high- and low-tech simulation platforms. Faculty and senior residents served as instructors. All educational activities were structured to include preparatory materials, pretraining briefing sessions, and immediate in-training or post-training review and debriefing. Baseline cognitive skills were assessed with written tests on basic patient management. Post-Boot Camp tests similarly evaluated cognitive skills. Technical skills were assessed using a variety of task-specific instruments, and expressed as a mean score for all activities for each resident. All measurements were expressed as percent (%) best possible score. Cognitive and technical performance in Boot Camp was compared with subsequent clinical and core curriculum evaluations including weekly quiz scores, annual American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores, program in-training evaluations (New Innovations, Uniontown, Ohio), and operative assessment instrument scores (OP-Rate, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts) for the remainder of the PGY-1 year. Performance data were available for 30 PGY-1 residents over 4 years. Baseline cognitive skills were lower for the first year of Boot Camp as compared with subsequent years (71 ± 13, 83 ± 9, 84 ± 11, and 86 ± 6, respectively; p = 0.028, analysis of variance; ANOVA). Performance improved between pretests and final testing (81 ± 11 vs 89 ± 7; p < 0.001 paired t test). There was statistically significant correlation between Boot Camp final cognitive test results and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores (p = 0.01; n = 22), but not quite significant for weekly curriculum quiz scores (p = 0.055; n = 22) and New Innovations cognitive assessments (p = 0.09; n = 25). Statistically significant correlation was also noted between Boot Camp mean overall skills and New Innovations technical skills assessments (p = 0.002; n = 25) and OP-Rate assessments (p = 0.01; n = 12). Individual simulation-based Boot Camp performance scores for cognitive and procedural skills assessments in PGY-1 residents correlate with subjective and objective clinical performance evaluations. This concurrent correlation with multiple traditional evaluation methods used to express competency in our residency program supports the use of Boot Camp performance measures as needs assessment tools as well as adjuncts to cumulative resident evaluation data.

Fernandez GL ，Page DW ，Coe NP ，Lee PC ，Patterson LA ，Skylizard L ，St Louis M ，Amaral MH ，Wait RB ，Seymour NE ... -  《-》