Perioperative psoas to lumbar vertebral index does not successfully predict amputation-free survival after lower extremity revascularization.

Accurate and convenient methods for assessing a patient's risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality comprise important tools in clinical decision-making. Whereas some aspects of the patient's fitness for surgery can be easily quantified, measurement of the patient's frailty is often difficult or time-consuming. Previous research in the context of multiple types of major surgical procedures has reported psoas-L4 vertebral index (PLVI) to be a useful predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. This retrospective cohort study assessed the hypothesis that PLVI can predict amputation-free survival (AFS) in patients undergoing open or endovascular lower extremity revascularization. The records of all lower extremity revascularization patients with preoperative computed tomography arteriography before revascularization during a recent 6-year period were reviewed for demographic information and outcomes. With use of embedded computed tomography software, the cross-sectional area of the bilateral psoas muscles and vertebral body at the L4 level were measured and used to calculate the PLVI. Univariate, multivariate logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed for the primary outcome of AFS. During a 6-year period, 188 patents had preoperative scanning, qualifying for inclusion in the study; 52% received open surgical bypass and 48% received a percutaneous endovascular procedure, with a median duration of follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3-24 months). Median bilateral psoas cross-sectional area was 24.9 cm2 (IQR, 20.5-29.7 cm2), and mean PLVI was 1.74 (IQR, 1.39-2.05). Cox proportional hazards analysis identified age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.14; P = .026), congestive heart failure (HR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.29-16.9; P = .019), and dyslipidemia (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.99; P = .049) as independent predictors of AFS loss, whereas PLVI was not (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 0.83-8.39; P = .099). Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis demonstrated no significant differences in survival between the highest and lowest PLVI cohorts of patients. Hazard analysis showed concomitant congestive heart failure (HR, 15; 95% CI, 1.1-210; P = .042) and serum albumin concentration (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.52; P = .0026) to be independent predictors of limb loss, whereas advanced age (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35; P = .0026), bypass procedure (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.04-21; P = .045), non-African American race (HR, 9.09; 95% CI, 1.02-100; P = .048), and higher PLVI (HR, 10.9; 95% CI, 1.7-72; P = .013) predicted increased risk of mortality. PLVI did not predict AFS after intervention for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. This is contrary to the ability of PLVI to predict perioperative and midterm survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and other major abdominal surgery.

Nyers ES ，Brothers TE 《-》

Total psoas area predicts medium-term mortality after lower limb revascularization.

Analytic morphometry is a novel concept in perioperative risk assessment. Low core muscle mass assessed by morphometry is associated with frailty and has been demonstrated to be an independent predictor of postoperative complications and mortality in oncologic, transplant, and aneurysm surgery. We aimed to study associations between core muscle mass and complication rates, length of hospital stay, and survival after surgical lower limb revascularization. In this retrospective cohort study, 263 patients considered for surgical lower limb revascularization between January 2013 and December 2014 underwent cross-sectional imaging. Total psoas area (TPA) was measured on computed tomography angiograms at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra by two independent observers blinded to clinical details. Clinical information was collected from patients' notes and the electronic medical record. Cox and logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the effect of clinical factors and psoas muscle area on survival, complication rates, and prolonged hospital stay after surgical lower limb revascularization. Data from 263 patients were analyzed. The American Society of Anesthesiologists score (hazard ratio [HR], 3.05; confidence interval [CI], 1.69-5.50; P < .001), emergency status (HR, 2.26; CI, 1.21-4.22; P = .011), lowest TPA quartile (HR, 1.89; CI, 1.07-3.35; P = .028), and Fontaine stage (HR, 1.63; CI, 1.04-2.53; P = .031) were found to be independent predictors of survival. Low TPA was not associated with increased rate of postoperative complications or prolonged hospital stay. Psoas muscle area may help identify patients with a shorter life expectancy after lower limb revascularization, but its role in predicting postoperative complications or length of hospital admission seems to be limited.

Juszczak MT ，Taib B ，Rai J ，Iazzolino L ，Carroll N ，Antoniou GA ，Neequaye S ，Torella F ... -  《-》

Predictive ability of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system after first-time lower extremity revascularizations.

The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system was proposed to predict 1-year amputation risk and potential benefit from revascularization. Our goal was to evaluate the predictive ability of this scale in a real-world selection of patients undergoing a first-time lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). From 2005 to 2014, 1336 limbs underwent a first-time lower extremity revascularization for CLTI, of which 992 had sufficient data to classify all three WIfI components (wound, ischemia, and foot infection). Limbs were stratified into the SVS WIfI clinical stages (from 1 to 4) for 1-year amputation risk estimation, a novel WIfI composite score from 0 to 9 (that weighs all WIfI variables equally), and a novel WIfI mean score from 0 to 3 (that can incorporate limbs missing any of the three WIfI components). Outcomes included major amputation; revascularization, major amputation, or stenosis (>3.5× step-up by duplex; RAS) events; and death. Predictors were identified using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Of the 1336 first-time procedures performed, 992 limbs were classified in all three WIfI components (524 endovascular and 468 bypass; 26% rest pain and 74% tissue loss). Cox regression demonstrated that a one-unit increase in the WIfI clinical stage increases the risk of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.2) and RAS events in all limbs (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3). Separate models of the entire cohort, a bypass-only cohort, and an endovascular-only cohort showed that a one-unit increase in the WIfI mean score is associated with an increase in the risk of major amputation (all three cohorts: HR, 5.3 [95% CI, 3.6-6.8], 4.1 [2.4-6.9], and 6.6 [3.8-11.6], respectively) and RAS events (all three cohorts: HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4-2.0], 1.9 [1.4-2.6], and 1.4 [1.1-1.9], respectively). The novel WIfI composite and WIfI mean scores were the only consistent predictors of death among the three cohorts, with the WIfI mean score proving most strongly predictive in the entire cohort (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), the bypass-only cohort (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9), and the endovascular-only cohort (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8). Although the individual WIfI wound component was able to predict mortality among all patients (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and bypass-only patients (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), neither the additional individual WIfI components nor the WIfI clinical stage were able to significantly predict mortality among any cohort. This study supports the ability of the SVS WIfI classification system to predict major amputation; however, the novel WIfI mean and WIfI composite scores predict amputation, RAS events, and mortality more consistently than any other current WIfI scoring system. The WIfI mean score allows inclusion of all limbs, and both novel scoring systems are easier to conceptualize, give equal weight to each WIfI component, and may provide clinicians more effective comparisons in outcomes between patients.

Darling JD ，McCallum JC ，Soden PA ，Guzman RJ ，Wyers MC ，Hamdan AD ，Verhagen HJ ，Schermerhorn ML ... -  《-》

Outcomes of lower extremity revascularization among the hemodialysis-dependent.

Optimal patient selection for lower extremity revascularization remains a clinical challenge among the hemodialysis-dependent (HD). The purpose of this study was to examine contemporary real world open and endovascular outcomes of HD patients to better facilitate patient selection for intervention. A regional multicenter registry was queried between 2003 and 2013 for HD patients (N = 689) undergoing open surgical bypass (n = 295) or endovascular intervention (n = 394) for lower extremity revascularization. Patient demographics and comorbidities were recorded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included graft patency, freedom from major adverse limb events, and amputation-free survival (AFS). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for death and amputation. Among the 689 HD patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, 66% were male, and 83% were white. Ninety percent of revascularizations were performed for critical limb ischemia and 8% for claudication. Overall survival at 1, 2, and 5 years survival remained low at 60%, 43%, and 21%, respectively. Overall 1- and 2-year AFS was 40% and 17%. Mortality accounted for the primary mode of failure for both open bypass (78%) and endovascular interventions (80%) at two years. Survival, AFS, and freedom from major adverse limb event outcomes did not differ significantly between revascularization techniques. At 2 years, endovascular patency was higher than open bypass (76% vs 26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.71; P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥80 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5; P < .01), indication of rest pain or tissue loss (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6; P < .01), preoperative wheelchair/bedridden status (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P < .01), coronary artery disease (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9; P < .01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .01) as independent predictors of death. The presence of three or more risk factors resulted in predicted 1-year mortality of 64%. Overall survival and AFS among HD patients remains poor, irrespective of revascularization strategy. Mortality remains the primary driver for these findings and justifies a prudent approach to patient selection. Focus for improved results should emphasize predictors of survival to better identify those most likely to benefit from revascularization.

Fallon JM ，Goodney PP ，Stone DH ，Patel VI ，Nolan BW ，Kalish JA ，Zhao Y ，Hamdan AD ，Vascular Study Group of New England ... -  《-》

Validation of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System in first-time lower extremity revascularization.

The Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) was developed as a new anatomic classification scheme to grade the severity of chronic limb threatening ischemia. We evaluated the ability of this anatomic grading system to determine major adverse limb events after lower extremity revascularization. We performed a single-institutional retrospective review of 1060 consecutive patients who had undergone 1180 first-time open or endovascular revascularization procedures for chronic limb threatening ischemia from 2005 to 2014. Using the review of angiographic images, the limbs were classified as GLASS stage 1, 2, or 3. The primary composite outcome was reintervention, major amputation (below- or above-the-knee amputation), and/or restenosis (>3.5× step-up by duplex criteria) events (RAS). The secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, failure to cross the lesion by endovascular methods, and a comparison between bypass vs endovascular intervention. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine the event rates at 1 and 5 years, and Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for baseline differences among the GLASS stages. Of all patients undergoing first-time revascularization, imaging studies were available for 1180 procedures (91%) for GLASS grading. Of these procedures, 552 were open bypass (47%) and 628 were endovascular intervention (53%). Compared with GLASS stage 1 disease (n = 267, 23%), stage 2 (n = 367; 31%) and stage 3 (n = 546; 42%) disease were associated with a greater risk of RAS at 1 year (stage 1, 33% vs stage 2, 48% vs stage 3, 53%) and 5 years (stage 1, 45% [reference]; stage 2, 65%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.2; P < .001; stage 3, 69%; HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7-2.9; P < .001). These differences were mainly driven by reintervention and restenosis rather than by major amputation. The 5-year mortality was similar for stage 2 and 3 compared with stage 1 disease (stage 1, 40% [reference]; stage 2, 45%; HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.4; P = .69; stage 3, 49%; HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = .11). For all attempted endovascular interventions, failure to cross a target lesion increased with advancing GLASS stage (stage 1, 4.5% vs stage 2, 6.3% vs stage 3, 13.3%; P < .01). Compared with open bypass (n = 552; 46.8%), endovascular intervention (n = 628; 53.3%) was associated with a higher rate of 5-year RAS for GLASS stage 1 (49% vs 34%; HR, 1.9; 95% CI, [1.1-3.5; P = .03), stage 2 (69% vs 52%; HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5; P < .01), and stage 3 (83% vs 61%; HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0; P < .01) disease. For patients undergoing first-time lower extremity revascularization, the GLASS can be used to predict for reintervention and restenosis. Bypass resulted in better long-term outcomes compared with endovascular intervention for all GLASS stages.

Liang P ，Marcaccio CL ，Darling JD ，Kong D ，Rao V ，St John E ，Wyers MC ，Hamdan AD ，Schermerhorn ML ... -  《-》