Effect of initiating use of an insulin pump in adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily insulin injections and continuous glucose monitoring (DIAMOND): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

The benefit of initiation of insulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; CSII) in patients with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has not been studied. We aimed to assess glycaemic outcomes when switching from multiple daily injections (MDI) to CSII in adults with type 1 diabetes using CGM. In this multicentre, randomised controlled trial, 75 adults with type 1 diabetes in the CGM group of the DIAMOND trial were randomly assigned via the study website using a computer-generated sequence to continue MDI or switch to CSII, with continuation of CGM, for 28 weeks. The primary outcome was CGM-measured time in the glucose concentration range of 70-180 mg/dL (3·9-10·0 mmol/L). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02282397. Between April 14, 2015, and May 5, 2016, 37 participants were randomly assigned to the CGM plus CSII group and 38 participants were randomly assigned to the CGM plus MDI group. The study was completed by 36 (97%) of 37 participants in the CGM plus CSII group and 35 (92%) of 38 participants in the CGM plus MDI group. Mean CGM use was 6·7 days per week (SD 0·8) in the CGM plus CSII group and 6·9 days per week (0·3) in the CGM plus MDI group (p=0·86). No participants in the CGM plus CSII group who completed the trial discontinued CSII. Over the follow-up period, mean time in the glucose concentration range of 70-180 mg/dL (3·9-10·0 mmol/L) was 791 min per day (SD 157) in the CGM plus CSII group and 741 min per day (225) in the CGM plus MDI group (adjusted mean treatment group difference: 83 min, 95% CI 17-149; p=0·01). Participants in the CGM plus CSII group had a greater reduction in CGM-measured mean glucose (p=0·005) and hyperglycaemia (on four metrics: p=0·007 for >180 mg/dL [>10·0 mmol/L], p=0·02 for >250 mg/dL [>13·9 mmol/L], p=0·04 for >300 mg/dL [>16·6 mmol/L], and p=0·02 for the area under the curve for 180 mg/dL [10·0 mmol/L]), but also an increase in CGM-measured hypoglycaemia (p=0·0001 for <70 mg/dL [<3·9 mmol/L], p=0·0002 for <60 mg/dL [<3·3 mmol/L], p=0·0009 for <50 mg/dL [<2·8 mmol/L], p=0·0002 for the area over the curve for 70 mg/dL [3·9 mmol/L]). Mean HbA1c change from baseline to 28 weeks was 0·3% (SD 0·9; 3·3 mmol/mol [SD 9·8]) in the CGM plus CSII group and 0·1% (0·4; 1·1 mmol/mol [4·4]) in the CGM plus MDI group (p=0·32). Severe hypoglycaemia occurred in one participant in the CGM plus MDI group, and diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hyperglycaemia occurred in one participant each in the CGM plus CSII group. Our findings show that glycaemic control measured by time in the glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL (3·9-10·0 mmol/L) is improved by initiation of CSII in adults with type 1 diabetes. However, biochemical hypoglycaemia also was increased in the study, which will be important to consider when incorporating these results into clinical practice. Dexcom.

Beck RW ，Riddlesworth TD ，Ruedy KJ ，Kollman C ，Ahmann AJ ，Bergenstal RM ，Bhargava A ，Bode BW ，Haller S ，Kruger DF ，McGill JB ，Polonsky W ，Price D ，Toschi E ，DIAMOND Study Group ... -  《-》

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SCIPI RCT.

Blair J ，McKay A ，Ridyard C ，Thornborough K ，Bedson E ，Peak M ，Didi M ，Annan F ，Gregory JW ，Hughes D ，Gamble C ... -  《-》

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injection regimens in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.

To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost utility of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with multiple daily injection (MDI) regimens during the first year following diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children and young people. Pragmatic, multicentre, open label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. 15 paediatric National Health Service (NHS) diabetes services in England and Wales. The study opened to recruitment in May 2011 and closed in January 2017. Patients aged between 7 months and 15 years, with a new diagnosis of type 1 diabetes were eligible to participate. Patients who had a sibling with the disease, and those who took drug treatments or had additional diagnoses that could have affected glycaemic control were ineligible. Participants were randomised, stratified by age and treating centre, to start treatment with CSII or MDI within 14 days of diagnosis. Starting doses of aspart (CSII and MDI) and glargine or detemir (MDI) were calculated according to weight and age, and titrated according to blood glucose measurements and according to local clinical practice. Primary outcome was glycaemic control (as measured by glycated haemoglobin; HbA1c) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were percentage of patients in each treatment arm with HbA1c within the national target range, incidence of severe hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis, change in height and body mass index (as measured by standard deviation scores), insulin requirements (units/kg/day), partial remission rate (insulin dose adjusted HbA1c <9), paediatric quality of life inventory score, and cost utility based on the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained from an NHS costing perspective. 294 participants were randomised and 293 included in intention to treat analyses (CSI, n=144; MDI, n=149). At 12 months, mean HbA1c was comparable with clinically unimportant differences between CSII and MDI participants (60.9 mmol/mol v 58.5 mmol/mol, mean difference 2.4 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval -0.4 to 5.3), P=0.09). Achievement of HbA1c lower than 58 mmol/mol was low among the two groups (66/143 (46%) CSII participants v 78/142 (55%) MDI participants; relative risk 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.06)). Incidence of severe hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis were low in both groups. Fifty four non-serious and 14 serious adverse events were reported during CSII treatment, and 17 non-serious and eight serious adverse events during MDI treatment. Parents (but not children) reported superior PedsQL scores for those patients treated with CSII compared to those treated with MDI. CSII was more expensive than MDI by £1863 (€2179; $2474; 95% confidence interval £1620 to £2137) per patient, with no additional QALY gains (difference -0.006 (95% confidence interval -0.031 to 0.018)). During the first year following type 1 diabetes diagnosis, no clinical benefit of CSII over MDI was identified in children and young people in the UK setting, and treatment with either regimen was suboptimal in achieving HbA1c thresholds. CSII was not cost effective. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29255275; European Clinical Trials Database 2010-023792-25.

Blair JC ，McKay A ，Ridyard C ，Thornborough K ，Bedson E ，Peak M ，Didi M ，Annan F ，Gregory JW ，Hughes DA ，Gamble C ，SCIPI investigators ... -  《BMJ-British Medical Journal》

Flexible insulin therapy with a hybrid regimen of insulin degludec and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with pump suspension before exercise in physically active adults with type 1 diabetes (FIT Untethered): a single-centre, open-label, proof-of-c

People with type 1 diabetes who use continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII, or insulin pump therapy) often remove their pump before extended periods of exercise, but this approach might result in reduced glycaemic control and increased risk of hyperglycaemia and ketogenesis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a hybrid approach, in which basal insulin delivery was divided between CSII and a daily injection of insulin degludec. In this single-centre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised crossover trial done at the LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology research centre, we recruited physically active and aerobically fit participants aged 18 years or older with type 1 diabetes who were using CSII. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of a computer-generated sequence to one of two sequences of either usual CSII, involving the continuation of the participant's usual CSII regimen, followed by crossover to hybrid CSII, in which the delivery of the participant's usual daily basal insulin dose was split (50% delivered by CSII and 50% delivered by a once-daily morning injection of 100 U/mL insulin degludec), or the opposite sequence (ie, hybrid CSII followed by crossover to usual CSII). Treatment was not masked to the investigators or participants. For each intervention, participants completed a moderate-intensity and a high-intensity in-clinic exercise session in the first week, followed by four high-intensity and two moderate-intensity home-based exercise sessions in the subsequent 3 weeks. Insulin pumps were suspended or disconnected 60 min before exercise and reconnected immediately after exercise during both treatment regimens. The coprimary outcomes were: (1) time spent in the target control range of 4·0-10·0 mmol/L blood glucose after high-intensity exercise, and (2) time spent in target control range of 4·0-10·0 mmol/L blood glucose after moderate-intensity exercise, measured by continuous glucose monitoring in the 6-h period from the start of the high-intensity and moderate-intensity in-clinic exercise sessions. Outcomes were assessed in a modified intention-to-treat population that included all participants who started both intervention phases and completed all of the in-clinic exercise visits. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03838783, and is complete. Between May 15, 2018, and March 5, 2019, we assessed 43 patients for eligibility, of whom 31 were randomly assigned to receive the usual CSII regimen (n=14) or hybrid CSII regimen (n=17) in the first phase (before crossover). The analysis population consisted of 24 participants who completed both study phases. Compared with the usual CSII regimen, participants on the hybrid CSII regimen had a significantly longer time in blood glucose range of 4-10 mmol/L during the 6-h period from the start of both moderate-intensity (mean difference 86 min [95% CI 61-147], p=0·005; percentage time in range 64% [SD 35] vs 40% [35]) and high-intensity in-clinic exercise session (60 min [11-109], p=0·01; 66% [32] vs 50% [27]). Participants on the hybrid CSII regimen also showed a higher time in blood glucose range of 4-10 mmol/L during home-based exercise sessions (mean difference 23 min [95% CI -1 to 46], p=0·055), with significantly lower time spent in hyperglycaemia than participants on the usual CSII regimen (mean difference 25 min [2-48], p=0·04). These exploratory outcomes also showed no significant difference in the amount of time spent in hypoglycaemia, nor the number of hypoglycaemic events, between the two interventions. There were three study-related adverse events reported with the usual CSII regimen (two hypotension events and one nausea event) and four with the hybrid CSII regimen (two hypotension events and two nausea events). A hybrid regimen of injected insulin degludec and CSII (with pump removal during exercise) appears to be safe and effective in adults with type 1 diabetes who exercise regularly. This approach could offer improved glycaemic control immediately after exercise and should be further assessed in a larger-scale randomised trial. Novo Nordisk.

Aronson R ，Li A ，Brown RE ，McGaugh S ，Riddell MC ... -  《-》

Comparison of Insulin Pump Therapy and Multiple Daily Injections Insulin Regimen in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes During Ramadan Fasting.

Alamoudi R ，Alsubaiee M ，Alqarni A ，Saleh Y ，Aljaser S ，Salam A ，Eledrisi M ... -  《-》