Ventricular tachycardia score - A novel method for wide QRS complex tachycardia differentiation - Explained.

Philosophy, merits and limitations of a novel method for wide QRS complex tachycardia differentiation, based on a scoring system and called the ventricular tachycardia (VT) score, were explained. The following criteria were assigned one point: initial dominant R wave in V1; initial r>40 ms in V1 or V2; notched S in V1; initial R wave in aVR; lead II RWPT≥50 ms; and absence of an RS in leads V1-V6. Atrioventricular dissociation (including fusion/capture beats and partial dissociation) was assigned two points. We recommend ≥3 VT score points for a firm diagnosis of VT. A cut-off ≥1 point can be used for diagnosis of VT when highest overall accuracy rather than error-free diagnosis is desired. However, in case of VT score of 0-2 (i.e., not fully diagnostic ECG), we recommend using other options (electrophysiological study, clinical data, previous and following ECGs, etc.) for confirming the diagnosis.

Jastrzębski M ，Kukla P ，Czarnecka D 《-》

The ventricular tachycardia score: a novel approach to electrocardiographic diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia.

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) continues to be challenging as none one of the available methods is specific for ventricular tachycardia (VT) diagnosis. We aimed to construct a method for WCT differentiation based on a scoring system, in which ECGs are graded according to the number of VT-specific features. This novel method was validated and compared with Brugada algorithm and other methods. A total of 786 WCTs (512 VTs) from 587 consecutive patients with a proven diagnosis were analysed by two blinded observers. The VT score method was based on seven ECG features: initial R wave in V1, initial r > 40 ms in V1/V2, notched S in V1, initial R in aVR, lead II R wave peak time ≥50 ms, no RS in V1-V6, and atrioventricular dissociation. Atrioventricular dissociation was assigned two points, and each of the other features was assigned one point. The overall accuracy of VT score ≥1 for VT diagnosis (83%) was higher than that of the aVR (72%, P = 0.001) and Brugada (81%) algorithms. Ventricular tachycardia score ≥3 was present in 66% of VTs and was more specific (99.6%) than any other algorithm/criterion for VT diagnosis. Ventricular tachycardia score ≥4 was present in 33% of VTs and was 100% specific for VT. The new ECG-based method provides a certain diagnosis of VT in the majority of patients with VT, identifies unequivocal ECGs, and has superior overall diagnostic accuracy to other ECG methods.

Jastrzebski M ，Sasaki K ，Kukla P ，Fijorek K ，Stec S ，Czarnecka D ... -  《-》

Specificity of electrocardiographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia in patients with intraventricular conduction defect.

In patients with organic intraventricular conduction defects (IVCDs), (1) QRS morphology during sinus rhythm frequently meets ventricular tachycardia (VT) morphological criteria and (2) there are further rate-related changes in QRS morphology. To search for the best morphological criteria in this context. We prospectively studied 69 patients, in sinus rhythm, with QRS duration ≥120 ms. Continuous rapid atrial pacing (RAP) trains were introduced at increasing rates in order to mimic supraventricular tachycardia. We analyzed the specificity of VT criteria during RAP. Finally, we used the criteria with a specificity of ≥0.9 in a "test sample" of 53 patients with preexisting IVCD and wide complex tachycardia to confirm their validity. Only 10 of the 20 analyzed criteria had a specificity of ≥0.9 during RAP at the highest rate. The specificity of these 10 criteria was confirmed in the test sample. The best accuracy to diagnose VT was obtained: for an isolated criterion: "R-wave peak time (RWPT) ≥50 ms at lead II" (specificity = 0.97; sensitivity = 0.67); for an algorithm: the combination of 2 criteria "RWPT ≥50 ms at lead II" and "absence of RS patterns in precordial leads" (specificity = 0.97; sensitivity = 0.88). In patients with IVCD, (1) specificity of most VT criteria is low during RAP, suggesting a limited applicability of many of these criteria in case they develop supraventricular tachycardia, and (2) the superior accuracy to diagnose VT was observed with "RWPT ≥50 ms at lead II" and for an algorithm with the combination of "RWPT ≥50 ms at lead II" and "absence of RS patterns in precordial leads."

Datino T ，Almendral J ，Avila P ，González-Torrecilla E ，Atienza F ，Arenal A ，Fernández-Avilés F ... -  《-》

[Differential diagnosis of tachycardia with a broad QRS-complex].

Deneke T ，Mügge A ，Kerber S ，Nentwich K ，Fochler F ，Müller P ，Grewe P ，Halbfass P ... -  《-》

Simple electrocardiographic criteria for rapid identification of wide QRS complex tachycardia: The new limb lead algorithm.

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is essential for the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a novel ECG algorithm on the basis of the morphological characteristics of the QRS on the limb leads. The limb lead algorithm (LLA) was evaluated by analyzing 528 monomorphic WCTs with electrophysiology-confirmed diagnoses. In the LLA, ventricular tachycardia (VT) is diagnosed in the presence of at least 1 of the following: (1) monophasic R wave in lead aVR; (2) predominantly negative QRS in leads I, II, and III; and (3) opposing QRS complex in the limb leads: concordant monophasic QRS in all 3 inferior leads and concordant monophasic QRS in 2 or 3 of the remaining limb leads with a polarity opposite to that of the inferior leads. The diagnostic performance of the LLA was compared with that of the Brugada, Vereckei, and R-wave peak time (RWPT) algorithms. Of 528 WCT cases, 397 were VT and 131 supraventricular tachycardia. The interobserver agreement for the LLA was excellent (κ = 0.98), better than that for the other algorithms. The overall accuracy of the LLA (88.1%) was similar to that of Brugada (85.4%) and Vereckei (88.1%) algorithms but was higher than that of the RWPT algorithm (70.8%). The LLA had a lower sensitivity (87.2%) than did Brugada (94.0%) and Vereckei (92.4%) algorithms, but not the RWPT algorithm (67.8%). Furthermore, the LLA showed a higher specificity (90.8%) than did Brugada (59.5%), Vereckei (76.3%), and RWPT (80.2%) algorithms. The LLA is a simple yet accurate method to diagnose VT when approaching WCTs on the ECG.

Chen Q ，Xu J ，Gianni C ，Trivedi C ，Della Rocca DG ，Bassiouny M ，Canpolat U ，Tapia AC ，Burkhardt JD ，Sanchez JE ，Hranitzky P ，Gallinghouse GJ ，Al-Ahmad A ，Horton R ，Di Biase L ，Mohanty S ，Natale A ... -  《-》