Acute pulmonary thromboembolism: Epidemiology, predictors, and long-term outcome - A single center experience.

Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a life-threatening disease. Mortality in PTE still remains very high in spite of progress in diagnostic tools. Mortality rate is about 30% in patients with unrecognized acute PTE. It is a single center observational study of 31 consecutive patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Cardiology at MS Ramaiah Memorial hospital between January 1, 2010 and June 2015. All the patients confirmed with diagnosis of acute PTE by CT scan (either HRCT or CTPA) were included in the study. Following relevant investigations chosen patients were risk stratified as per standard guidelines into massive, sub massive or low risk and treated accordingly. The included patients were followed up for a period of 1 year with 2D-echocardiogram and other relevant investigations for comparison to assess improvement. Mortality due to either acute PTE or other causes was noted in the study. Of the 31 patients enrolled in our study, 71% (n=22) of the patients belonged to the age range 20-50 years with those in the age group 31-40 years comprising 39% (n=12) of the total. Elderly people over 65 years of age comprised only 19% (n=6) of the total number of patients. Dyslipidemia, prolonged immobilization, deep vein thrombosis, post-operative state, malignancy and post-partum period were the commonly reported risk factors. We thrombolysed a total of 18 (58%) patients with massive and submassive PTE, of which 12 (39%) received tenecteplase and 6 patients received streptokinase (19%). Three (9%) patients required repeat thrombolysis with streptokinase due to failed thrombolytic therapy with tenecteplase. Our study reported higher incidence of acute PTE in the middle age group population. Prevalence of dyslipidemia was high in this cohort of patients studied although the exact association of it in APE could not be determined. Thrombolytic therapy can be considered for patients with both massive and submassive pulmonary thromboembolism. Repeat thrombolysis can be considered in case one thrombolytic agent failed to give the desirable results.

Nagamalesh UM ，Prakash VS ，Naidu KCK ，Sarthak S ，Hegde AV ，Abhinay T ... -  《-》

[The effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy in patients with massive and submassive pulmonary thromboembolism].

Savaş Bozbaş S ，Akçay S ，Kivanç T ，Ozsancak A ，Oner Eyüboğlu F ... -  《-》

In-hospital and long-term outcome after sub-massive and massive pulmonary embolism submitted to thrombolytic therapy.

Meneveau N ，Ming LP ，Séronde MF ，Mersin N ，Schiele F ，Caulfield F ，Bernard Y ，Bassand JP ... -  《-》

Current Controversies in Thrombolytic Use in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has an annual incidence of 100,000 cases in the United States and is divided into three categories: nonmassive, submassive, and massive. Several studies have evaluated the use of thrombolytics in submassive and massive PE. Our aim was to provide emergency physicians with an updated review of the controversy about the use of thrombolytics in submassive and massive PE. Nonmassive PE is defined as PE in the setting of no signs of right ventricular strain (echocardiogram or biomarker) and hemodynamic stability. Submassive PE is defined as evidence of right ventricular strain with lack of hemodynamic instability. Massive PE occurs with occlusive thromboembolism that causes hemodynamic instability. Thrombolysis is warranted in patients with massive PE. Thrombolytic use in submassive PE with signs of right ventricular strain or damage presents a quandary for physicians. Several recent studies have evaluated the use of thrombolytics in patients with submassive PE. These studies have inconsistent definitions of submassive PE, evaluate differing primary outcomes, and use different treatment protocols with thrombolytics and anticoagulation agents. Although significant study heterogeneity exists, thrombolytics can improve long-term outcomes, with decreased bleeding risk with half-dose thrombolytics and catheter-directed treatments. Major bleeding significantly increases in patients over age 65 years. The risks and benefits of thrombolytic treatment-primarily improved long-term outcomes-should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Shared decision-making with the patient discussing the risks and benefits of treatment is advised. Thrombolytic use in massive PE is warranted, but patients with submassive PE require case-by-case analysis with shared decision making. The risks, including major hemorrhage, and benefits, primarily improved long-term outcomes, should be considered. Half-dose thrombolytics and catheter-directed treatment demonstrate advantages with decreased risk of bleeding and improved long-term functional outcomes. Further studies that assess risk stratification, functional outcomes, and treatment protocols are needed.

Long B ，Koyfman A 《JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE》

Clinical characteristics and outcome of thai patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Sompradeekul S ，Ittimakin S 《-》