A systematic investigation of the association between HPV and the clinicopathological parameters and prognosis of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

Human papillomavirus (HPV), the causal factor of cervical cancers, was closely linked to the etiology and prognosis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), but its role in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) was unclear. In addition, few researches based on Chinese population were documented. Hence, we sought to investigate the relationship of HPV marker P16 protein to the clinicopathological parameters and survival of OPSCC and OSCC patients systematically to assess the influence of ethnic, regional difference on HPV susceptibility. Specimens from 93 OPSCC patients and 95 OSCC patients were recut, and P16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed. Moreover, survival analysis was conducted to confirm the independent factors that influenced the prognosis. The P16 results were positive in 25.8% and 9.5% of patients with OPSCC and OSCC, respectively. The overall survival (OS) of HPV-positive OPSCC patients was significantly longer than that of HPV-negative OPSCC patients (P = 0.004). Conversely, statistical significance was not observed regarding the OS of OSCC patients (P = 0.343). Cox regression analysis indicated that T stage and P16 status were independent factors that affected the prognosis of OPSCC patients, and the smoking index influenced the prognosis of OSCC patients. Among OPSCC patients who received radiochemotherapy (RCT), HPV-positive patients had a better survival rate than their HPV-negative counterparts (P = 0.015). Conversely, no significant difference was observed between HPV-positive and HPV-negative OSCC patients who received RCT (P = 0.237). P16 is a credible surrogate by which to define HPV status. HPV expression had a favorable effect on OPSCC patients as opposed to their OSCC counterparts in this single center population-based study.

Wang F ，Zhang H ，Xue Y ，Wen J ，Zhou J ，Yang X ，Wei J ... -  《Cancer Medicine》

The prognostic role of sex, race, and human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a well-established prognostic marker for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). Because of the limited numbers of women and nonwhites in studies to date, sex and racial/ethnic differences in prognosis have not been well explored. In this study, survival differences were explored by the tumor HPV status among 1) patients with OPSCCs by sex and race and 2) patients with nonoropharyngeal (non-OP) head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCCs). This retrospective, multi-institution study included OPSCCs and non-OP HNSCCs of the oral cavity, larynx, and nasopharynx diagnosed from 1995 to 2012. Race/ethnicity was categorized as white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, Asian non-Hispanic, and Hispanic of any race. Tumors were centrally tested for p16 overexpression and the presence of HPV by HPV16 DNA and high-risk HPV E6/E7 messenger RNA in situ hybridization. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS). The study population included 239 patients with OPSCC and 621 patients with non-OP HNSCC with a median follow-up time of 3.5 years. After adjustments for the tumor HPV status, age, current tobacco use, and stage, the risk of death was lower for women versus men with OPSCC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.55; P = .04). The results were similar with p16. In contrast, for non-OP HNSCCs, HPV positivity, p16 positivity, and sex were not associated with OS. For OPSCC, there are differences in survival by sex, even after the tumor HPV status has been taken into account. For non-OP HNSCC, the HPV status and the p16 status are not of prognostic significance. Cancer 2017;123:1566-1575. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Fakhry C ，Westra WH ，Wang SJ ，van Zante A ，Zhang Y ，Rettig E ，Yin LX ，Ryan WR ，Ha PK ，Wentz A ，Koch W ，Richmon JD ，Eisele DW ，D'Souza G ... -  《-》

The prognostic significance of the biomarker p16 in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

There is an increasing incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC) mostly associated with favourable outcomes. p16 immunohistochemistry is a surrogate marker for HPV positivity in OPSCC. The prognostic strength of p16 over traditional prognostic factors is not fully characterised. In this study, we evaluated the clinical and demographic differences between p16-positive and -negative OPSCC and characterised its prognostic strength versus traditional prognostic factors. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks and clinical information from 217 OPSCC patients, treated with radiotherapy (alone or in combination with other therapies) between 2000 and 2010 were collected retrospectively. Immunohistochemistry for p16 protein was carried out; cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and locoregional control (LRC) were calculated for both univariate and multivariate analyses. Ninety-two per cent of the OPSCC originated from tonsil and tongue base sites, 61% were p16 positive. Patients with p16-positive OPSCC were younger (P < 0.0001), with lower alcohol (P = 0.0002) and tobacco (P = 0.0001) exposure. The tumours were less differentiated (P = 0.0069), had a lower T stage (P = 0.0027), higher nodal status (P = 0.014) and higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) prognostic group (P = 0.0036). AJCC prognostic group was significant for RFS (P = 0.0096) and CSS (P = 0.018) in patients with p16-negative OPSCC, but not those with p16-positive tumours (P = 0.30 and 0.54). Other significant factors for CSS and RFS in univariate analysis were: pretreatment haemoglobin (P < 0.0001 and <0.0001), chemoradiotherapy (P = 0.005 and 0.03) and P16 status (P < 0.0001 and 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, p16 positivity was the strongest independent prognostic variable for both CSS, RFS and LRC (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio 4.15; 95% confidence interval 2.43-7.08), (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio 6.15; 95% confidence interval 3.57-10.61) and (P = 0.001, hazard ratio 3.74; confidence interval 1.76-7.95). This study shows that p16 is the single most important prognostic variable in OPSCC, surpassing traditional prognostic factors for both CSS and RFS. Furthermore, disease stage has no prognostic significance in p16-positive patients, highlighting the need for routine p16 assessment in OPSCC.

Oguejiofor KK ，Hall JS ，Mani N ，Douglas C ，Slevin NJ ，Homer J ，Hall G ，West CM ... -  《-》

Extracapsular extension of neck nodes and absence of human papillomavirus 16-DNA are predictors of impaired survival in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) demonstrate superior outcome compared with HPV-negative OPSCCs. The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification (TNM 2017) modifies OPSCC staging based on p16 positivity as a surrogate for HPV-driven disease. In p16-negative OPSCCs, lymph node (N) categories include extracapsular/extranodal extension (ECE); and, in p16-positive OPSCCs, N categories are based on the number of positive neck lymph nodes omitting ECE status. The objective of the current study was to assess the prognostic impact of positive ECE status and the detection of HPV16 DNA in patients with p16-positive OPSCC. In a cohort of 92 patients with p16-positive, lymph node (N)-positive (stage III-IVB) OPSCC who underwent surgery and neck dissection, allowing for a pathologic examination of positive lymph nodes, 66 of 92 patients (71.4%) were p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive, 62 of 92 (67%) were ECE-positive, and 45 of 62 (72.6%) were ECE-positive, p16-positive, and HPV16 DNA-positive. Differences in outcome were assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression (CoxR) for tumor-specific survival and overall survival (OS). The mean numbers of positive lymph nodes in ECE-positive patients (5.0 positive lymph nodes; 95% CI, 3.8-6.4 positive lymph nodes) and ECE-negative patients (2.4 positive lymph nodes; 95% CI, 1.8-2.9 positive lymph nodes) were different (P = .0007). ECE affected OS and tumor-specific survival in p16-positive patients (P = .007 and P = .047, respectively) and in p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive patients (P = .013 and P = .026, respectively). Related to the unequal distributions of ECE-positive/HPV16 DNA-negative tumors, the TNM 2017 failed to discriminate OS in patients with UICC stage I, II, and III disease (mean OS, 54.5, 73.4, and 45 months, respectively; median OS, 64.7 months, not reached, and 41.1 months, respectively). According to a univariate CoxR, the presence of ECE predicted impaired OS in patients with p16-positive OPSCC (hazard ratio, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.17-9.89; P = .025) and even greater impaired OS in those with p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive OPSCC (HR, 8.64; 95% CI, 1.12-66.40; P = .038). Multivariate CoxR confirmed ECE and HPV16 DNA detection as independent predictors. ECE and HPV16 DNA status should be included in the prognostic staging of patients with p16-positive OPSCC because several lines of evidence demonstrate their impact on survival.

Freitag J ，Wald T ，Kuhnt T ，Gradistanac T ，Kolb M ，Dietz A ，Wiegand S ，Wichmann G ... -  《-》

Biologic importance and prognostic significance of selected clinicopathological parameters in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, with emphasis on smoking, protein p16(INK4a) expression, and HPV status.

Laco J ，Nekvindova J ，Novakova V ，Celakovsky P ，Dolezalova H ，Tucek L ，Vosmikova H ，Vosmik M ，Neskudlova T ，Cermakova E ，Hacova M ，Sobande FA ，Ryska A ... -  《NEOPLASMA》