Comparison of CT-RECTOR and J-CTO scores to predict chronic total occlusion difficulty for percutaneous coronary intervention.

We sought to evaluate the ability of the CT-RECTOR and J-CTO scores to predict time-efficient guidewire (GW) crossing through a chronic total occlusion (CTO) and final procedure success. Data from 191 consecutive CTO lesions with pre-procedural coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from our center were analyzed retrospectively. The difficulty of the procedure was classified as easy, intermediate, difficult, or very difficult according to CT-RECTOR and J-CTO scores. A successful GW crossing within 30min was set as the first endpoint. Final success of the procedure was set as the second endpoint. Receiver operating characteristic curves and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to compare the performance of both scores in predicting both endpoints. The first and second endpoints were achieved in 55% and 76% of lesions, respectively. The NRI for prediction for both endpoints were 30.21% and 28.94%, respectively. Use of the CT-RECTOR score demonstrated a positive NRI for both the first (p=0.0027) and second (p=0.0190) endpoints. Compared with the J-CTO score (area under the curve: 0.76), the CT-RECTOR score (area under the curve: 0.85) yielded a higher predictive value for successful GW crossing within 30min (p=0.0018). Compared with J-CTO, the CT-RECTOR scoring system provides a more accurate noninvasive tool for predicting time-efficient GW crossing and final procedure success. This scoring system, which is based on CCTA, may aid in the identification of very difficult CTO lesions and downstream management.

Tan Y ，Zhou J ，Zhang W ，Zhou Y ，Du L ，Tian F ，Guo J ，Chen L ，Cao F ，Chen Y ... -  《-》

Coronary computed tomographic prediction rule for time-efficient guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion: insights from the CT-RECTOR multicenter registry (Computed Tomography Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization).

This study sought to establish a coronary computed tomography angiography prediction rule for grading chronic total occlusion (CTO) difficulty for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The uncertainty of procedural outcome remains the strongest barrier to PCI in CTO. Data from 4 centers involving 240 consecutive CTO lesions with pre-procedural coronary computed tomography angiography were analyzed. Successful guidewire (GW) crossing ≤30 min was set as an endpoint to eliminate operator bias. The CT-RECTOR (Computed Tomography Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization) score was developed by assigning 1 point for each independent predictor, and then summing all points accrued. Continuous distribution of scores was used to stratify CTO into 4 difficulty groups: easy (score 0); intermediate (score 1); difficult (score 2); and very difficult (score ≥3). Discriminatory performance was tested by 10-fold cross-validation and compared with the angiographic J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan) score. Study endpoint was achieved in 55% of cases. Multivariable analysis yielded multiple occlusions, blunt stump, severe calcification, bending, duration of CTO ≥12 months, and previously failed PCI as independent predictors for GW crossing. The probability of successful GW crossing ≤30 min for each group (from easy to very difficult) was 95%, 88%, 57%, and 22%, respectively. Areas under receiver-operator characteristic curves for the CT-RECTOR and J-CTO scores were 0.83 and 0.71, respectively (p < 0.001). Both the original model fit and 10-fold cross-validation correctly classified 77.3% of lesions. The CT-RECTOR score represents a simple and accurate noninvasive tool for predicting time-efficient GW crossing that may aid in grading CTO difficulty before PCI. (Computed Tomography Angiography Prediction Score for Percutaneous Revascularization for Chronic Total Occlusions [CT-RECTOR]; NCT02022878).

Opolski MP ，Achenbach S ，Schuhbäck A ，Rolf A ，Möllmann H ，Nef H ，Rixe J ，Renker M ，Witkowski A ，Kepka C ，Walther C ，Schlundt C ，Debski A ，Jakubczyk M ，Hamm CW ... -  《-》

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Guidewire Crossing and Success of Percutaneous Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion: Korean Multicenter CTO CT Registry Score as a Tool for Assessing Difficulty in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous

Yu CW ，Lee HJ ，Suh J ，Lee NH ，Park SM ，Park TK ，Yang JH ，Song YB ，Hahn JY ，Choi SH ，Gwon HC ，Lee SH ，Choe YH ，Kim SM ，Choi JH ... -  《-》

CT Angiography-Derived RECHARGE Score Predicts Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion.

To investigate the feasibility and the accuracy of the coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived Registry of Crossboss and Hybrid procedures in France, the Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom (RECHARGE) score (RECHARGECCTA) for the prediction of procedural success and 30-minutes guidewire crossing in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). One hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age, 54 years; 79% male) with 131 CTO lesions who underwent CCTA before catheter angiography (CA) with CTO-PCI were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The RECHARGECCTA scores were calculated and compared with RECHARGECA and other CTA-based prediction scores, including Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan (J-CTO), CT Registry of CTO Revascularisation (CT-RECTOR), and Korean Multicenter CTO CT Registry (KCCT) scores. The procedural success rate of the CTO-PCI procedures was 72%, and 61% of cases achieved the 30-minutes wire crossing. No significant difference was observed between the RECHARGECCTA score and the RECHARGECA score for procedural success (median 2 vs. median 2, p = 0.084). However, the RECHARGECCTA score was higher than the RECHARGECA score for the 30-minutes wire crossing (median 2 vs. median 1.5, p = 0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the RECHARGECCTA and RECHARGECA scores for predicting procedural success showed no statistical significance (0.718 vs. 0.757, p = 0.655). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and the negative predictive value of the RECHARGECCTA scores of ≤ 2 for predictive procedural success were 78%, 60%, 43%, and 87%, respectively. The RECHARGECCTA score showed a discriminative performance that was comparable to those of the other CTA-based prediction scores (AUC = 0.718 vs. 0.665-0.717, all p > 0.05). The non-invasive RECHARGECCTA score performs better than the invasive determination for the prediction of the 30-minutes wire crossing of CTO-PCI. However, the RECHARGECCTA score may not replace other CTA-based prediction scores for predicting CTO-PCI success.

Li J ，Wang R ，Tesche C ，Schoepf UJ ，Pannell JT ，He Y ，Huang R ，Chen Y ，Li J ，Song X ... -  《-》

Procedural success of CTO recanalization: Comparison of the J-CTO score determined by coronary CT angiography to invasive angiography.

The J-CTO score is based on invasive angiography, combines several parameters of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO), and is well established to predict the likelihood of success of percutaneous recanalization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and validate a J-CTOCT score derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA). Between April 2011 and December 2014, 159 consecutive patients were retrospectively included. All had at least one CTO in invasive angiography, had coronary CTA performed at an interval of no more than one week from invasive angiography, and had an attempt at percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following coronary CTA In parallel to the angiographic J-CTO score, the J-CTOCT score was determined by awarding one point each for a blunt vessel stump, bending > 45°, occlusion length ≥ 20 mm, presence of calcium covering > 50% of any vessel cross-section within the occlusion, or a previously failed attempt at PCI. a. Both scores were compared regarding their ability to predict successful recanalization. A total of 171 CTO lesions were analyzed. Intraobserver (k = 0.814, p < 0.001) and interobserver agreement (k = 0.771, p < 0.001) for calculation of the J-CTOCT score were close. The mean occlusion length measured by coronary CTA was significantly shorter than in invasive angiography (27.6 ± 14.8 mm vs. 37.2 ± 18.8 mm, p < 0.001). The J-CTOCT score (mean: 1.9 ± 1.4) correlated closely to the angiographic J-CTO score (mean: 1.8 ± 1.3, r = 0.856, p < 0.001), and in 122/171 lesions (71%), the scores were identical. Both J-CTOCT score (area under curve: 0.882, p < 0.001) and angiographic J-CTO score (area under curve: 0.868, p < 0.001) yielded similarly high predictive value for successful guidewire crossing within 30 min (p = 0.496). While the length of coronary occlusions in coronary CTA is significantly shorter than in invasive angiography, a J-CTOCT score determined by coronary CTA closely correlates to the angiographic J-CTO score. .

Li Y ，Xu N ，Zhang J ，Li M ，Lu Z ，Wei M ，Lu B ，Zhang Y ... -  《-》