Prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with superficial-vein thrombosis given rivaroxaban or fondaparinux: the open-label, randomised, non-inferiority SURPRISE phase 3b trial.

Superficial-vein thrombosis can lead to deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, might simplify treatment compared with fondaparinux because it does not require daily subcutaneous injection and is cheaper. We compared efficacy outcomes in patients with superficial-vein thrombosis and additional risk factors given either rivaroxaban or fondaparinux to assess whether rivaroxaban is non-inferior to fondaparinux in the prevention of thromboembolic complications. In this open-label, masked endpoint, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3b trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with symptomatic superficial-vein thrombosis from 27 sites (academic, community hospitals, and specialist practices) in Germany. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 10 mg oral rivaroxaban or 2·5 mg subcutaneous fondaparinux once a day for 45 days. Patients were eligible if they had symptomatic thrombosis (at least 5 cm in a supragenual superficial-vein segment) and at least one additional risk factor (older than 65 years, male sex, previous venous thromboembolism, cancer, autoimmune disease, thrombosis of non-varicose veins). Main exclusion criteria were: symptoms for longer than 3 weeks, thrombus within 3 cm of the sapheno-femoral junction, indication for full-dose anticoagulation therapy, and substantial hepatic or renal impairment. Randomisation was done with a central block randomisation process. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, progression or recurrence of superficial vein-thrombosis, and all-cause mortality at 45 days in the per-protocol population (all randomly assigned patients without major protocol violations). We used a non-inferiority margin of 4·5% (absolute difference between rivaroxaban and fondaparinux). The main safety outcome was major bleeding. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01499953. Between April 25, 2012, and Feb 18, 2016, 485 patients were enrolled in the study and 472 were randomly assigned to the rivaroxaban group (n=236) or the fondaparinux group (n=236). In the 435 patients included in the per-protocol analysis set, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in seven (3%) of 211 patients (95% CI 1·6-6·7) in the rivaroxaban group and in four (2%) of 224 patients (0·7-4·5) in the fondaparinux group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·9, 95% CI 0·6-6·4; p=0·0025 for non-inferiority) at day 45. There were no major bleeds in either group. There was one death in the rivaroxaban group; this patient died from cardiogenic shock on day 50 after a type A aortic dissection, not related to treatment. Rivaroxaban was non-inferior to fondaparinux for treatment of superficial-vein thrombosis in terms of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, progression or recurrence of superficial vein-thrombosis, and all-cause mortality, and was not associated with more major bleeding. Therefore, rivaroxaban could offer patients with symptomatic superficial-vein thrombosis a less burdensome and less expensive oral treatment option instead of a more expensive subcutaneous injection. GWT-TUD and Bayer Vital.

Beyer-Westendorf J ，Schellong SM ，Gerlach H ，Rabe E ，Weitz JI ，Jersemann K ，Sahin K ，Bauersachs R ，SURPRISE investigators ... -  《Lancet Haematology》

Safety and effectiveness of oral rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (XALIA): an international, prospective, non-interventional study.

The efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant rivaroxaban for the treatment and secondary prevention of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism has been shown in phase 3 trials. However, data about rivaroxaban use in routine clinical practice are needed. XA inhibition with rivaroxaban for Long-term and Initial Anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism (XALIA) was a multicentre, international, prospective, non-interventional study of patients with deep-vein thrombosis, done in hospitals and community care centres in 21 countries. The study investigated the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with standard anticoagulation therapy (initial treatment with unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or fondaparinux, usually overlapping with and followed by a vitamin K antagonist) for at least 3 months. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with an objectively confirmed diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis, and an indication to receive anticoagulation treatment for at least 3 months. Following approval of rivaroxaban for the pulmonary embolism indication, patients with deep-vein thrombosis and concomitant pulmonary embolism were also eligible; however, those with isolated pulmonary embolism were not included. Type, dose, and duration of therapy for each patient were at the physician's discretion. The primary effectiveness and safety outcomes were major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality. Propensity score-adjusted analyses were done to account for potential imbalances between groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01619007. Between June 26, 2012, and March 31, 2014, 5142 patients were enrolled. The safety population (all patients who received at least one dose of the anticoagulant of interest) comprised 2619 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 2149 in the standard anticoagulant therapy group. Patients in the rivaroxaban group were younger and fewer had active cancer or concomitant pulmonary embolism than those in the standard anticoagulation group. In the propensity score-adjusted population, the frequency of major bleeding was 0·8% (19/2505) in the rivaroxaban group and 2·1% (43/2010) in the standard anticoagulation group, with a propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0·77 (95% CI 0·40-1·50); p=0·44. The frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism was 1·4% (36/2505) in the rivaroxaban group and 2·3% (47/2010) in the standard anticoagulation group (propensity score-adjusted HR 0·91 [95% CI 0·54-1·54], p=0·72). The all-cause mortality frequency was 0·4% (11/2505) in the rivaroxaban group and 3·4% (69/2010) in the standard anticoagulation group (propensity score-adjusted HR 0·51 [95% CI 0·24-1·07], p=0·074). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the safety population was similar between the two groups (944 [36·0%] of 2619 in the rivaroxaban group vs 805 [37·5%] of 2149 in the standard anticoagulation group). In routine clinical practice, rivaroxaban-treated patients had a lower risk profile at baseline than those treated with standard anticoagulation. Propensity score-adjusted results confirm that rivaroxaban is a safe and effective alternative to standard anticoagulation therapy in a broad range of patients. Rates of major bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism were low in rivaroxaban-treated patients and consistent with phase 3 findings. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

Ageno W ，Mantovani LG ，Haas S ，Kreutz R ，Monje D ，Schneider J ，van Eickels M ，Gebel M ，Zell E ，Turpie AG ... -  《Lancet Haematology》

A treatment strategy using subcutaneous fondaparinux followed by oral rivaroxaban is effective for treating acute venous thromboembolism.

The factor Xa inhibitors have been widely used for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the efficacy of factor Xa inhibitors in Japanese patients with VTE has not been well examined. In this study, we investigated the effect of the sequential use of two factor Xa inhibitors in patients with acute VTE. We conducted an observational study of 87 consecutive patients diagnosed with VTE. As an initial treatment, we administered subcutaneous fondaparinux to the patients for 7-10 days, and then switched to oral rivaroxaban. The symptoms and findings were assessed after the initial treatment and after using rivaroxaban for 7-14 days. We evaluated the deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the legs using our own scoring system [quantitative ultrasound thrombosis (QUT) score]. Of the 87 patients, 33% had symptoms, half had pulmonary embolism (PE), and 95% had DVT of the legs. Out of the 87 patients, VTE worsened during the administration of fondaparinux in 4 patients. All of them had experienced malignancy, and died within 6 months. Of two patients developing bleeding, one patient required a transfusion. Eventually, this strategy was effective in 80 patients and had no change in one. The D-dimer level was significantly reduced by fondaparinux (17.8μg/ml±16.0μg/ml vs. 8.3μg/ml±7.2μg/ml, p<0.0001), followed by rivaroxaban (8.3μg/ml±7.2μg/ml vs. 5.5μg/ml±4.9μg/ml, p<0.0001). Similarly, the QUT score was improved by fondaparinux (4.7±2.6 vs. 2.5±2.5, p<0.0001), and further reduced by rivaroxaban (2.5±2.5 vs. 1.9±1.8, p<0.0001). A treatment strategy using subcutaneous fondaparinux followed by oral rivaroxaban is effective for treating acute VTE in Japanese patients.

Kabuki T ，Nakanishi R ，Hisatake S ，Fujii T ，Dobashi S ，Wakakura S ，Kiuchi S ，Fujino T ，Ikeda T ... -  《-》

Superficial vein thrombosis treated for 45 days with rivaroxaban versus fondaparinux: rationale and design of the SURPRISE trial.

Werth S ，Bauersachs R ，Gerlach H ，Rabe E ，Schellong S ，Beyer-Westendorf J ... -  《-》

Rivaroxaban versus fondaparinux for thromboprophylaxis after endovenous laser ablation.

Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are well-known complications after superficial endovenous thermoablation. We investigated the efficacy of rivaroxaban in preventing EHIT and DVT after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of patients presenting with truncal varicosis class C2 to C6 undergoing EVLA. After EVLA, all patients received oral rivaroxaban (10 mg) or subcutaneous fondaparinux (2.5 mg) once daily for 3 consecutive days. The primary end point was the composite of EHIT or DVT assessed by duplex ultrasound imaging after 1 and 4 weeks. EHIT class 1 was defined as the thrombus extending to the saphenofemoral junction. Extension into the deep venous system with a cross-sectional area obstruction <50% was considered EHIT class 2. EHIT class 3 was defined as >50% cross-sectional area obstruction. EHIT class 4 was total occlusion of the femoral vein. The secondary end points were minor or major bleeding, paresthesia, and skin burns. Between February 2009 and December 2015, 391 patients (473 limbs) were treated with EVLA of the truncal saphenous vein. The primary end point occurred in 13 of 166 (7.8%) and 14 of 225 (6.2%) after 1 week and in 13 of 166 (7.8%) and 15 of 225 (6.7%) after 4 weeks comparing the rivaroxaban and fondaparinux groups (P = .659). EHIT class 1 was observed in 20 patients (5.1%) and EHIT class 2 in five (1.3%). No patients had EHIT class 3 or 4. The incidence of DVT was one of 166 (0.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and two of 225 (0.9%) in the fondaparinux group (P = .750). Minor bleeding events occurred in 17 of 166 patients (10.2%) and in 20 of 225 patients (8.9%), respectively (P = .652). No major bleeding events were observed. Paresthesia was observed in 12.5% in the rivaroxaban group and in 17.8% in the fondaparinux group. No skin burns were observed. Rivaroxaban offers an oral medication approach showing no difference in preventing EHIT and DVT compared with fondaparinux, without increased bleeding risk.

Keo HH ，Baumann F ，Diehm N ，Regli C ，Staub D ... -  《-》