Justifying Nonstandard Exception Requests for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates: An Analysis of Narratives Submitted to the United Network for Organ Sharing, 2009-2014.

Nonstandard exception requests (NSERs), for which transplant centers provide patient-specific narratives to support a higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease score, are made for >30% of pediatric liver transplant candidates. We describe the justifications used in pediatric NSER narratives 2009-2014 and identify justifications associated with NSER denial, waitlist mortality, and transplant. Using United Network for Organ Sharing data, 1272 NSER narratives from 1138 children with NSERs were coded for analysis. The most common NSER justifications were failure-to-thrive (48%) and risk of death (40%); both associated with approval. Varices, involvement of another organ, impaired quality of life, and encephalopathy were justifications used more often in denied NSERs. Of the 25 most prevalent justifications, 60% were not associated with approval or denial. Waitlist mortality risk was increased when fluid overload or "posttransplant complication outside standard criteria" were cited and decreased when liver-related infection was noted. Transplant probability was increased when the narrative mentioned liver-related infections, and fluid overload for children <2 years old; it decreased when "posttransplant complications outside standard criteria" and primary sclerosing cholangitis were cited. This analysis provides novel insight and suggests targets for future consideration in outcomes research and exception criteria. Changes in the allocation system are needed to ensure equity and optimize outcomes for all pediatric candidates.

Perito ER ，Braun HJ ，Dodge JL ，Rhee S ，Roberts JP ... -  《-》

Nonstandard Exception Requests Impact Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.

Nonstandard exceptions requests (NSERs), in which transplant centers appeal on a case-by-case basis for Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease/Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease points, have been highly utilized for pediatric liver transplant candidates. We evaluated whether NSE outcomes are associated with waitlist and posttransplant mortality. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on pediatric liver transplant candidates listed in 2009-2014 were analyzed after excluding those granted automatic UNOS exceptions. Of 2581 pediatric waitlist candidates, 44% had an NSE request. Of the 1134 children with NSERs, 93% were approved and 7% were denied. For children 2-18 years at listing, NSER denial increased the risk of waitlist mortality or removal for being too sick (subhazard ratio 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-7.07, p = 0.01 in multivariate analysis). For children younger than 2 years, NSER denial did not impact waitlist mortality/removal. Children with NSER approved had reduced risk of graft loss 3 years posttransplant in univariate but not multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01, p = 06). Those with NSER denial had a higher risk of posttransplant death than those with no NSER (hazard ratio 2.43, 95% CI 0.99-5.95, p = 0.05, multivariable analysis), but NSER approval did not impact posttransplant death. Further research on NSER utilization in pediatric liver transplant is needed to optimize organ allocation and outcomes for children.

Braun HJ ，Perito ER ，Dodge JL ，Rhee S ，Roberts JP ... -  《-》

Impact of the Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) growth failure thresholds on mortality among pediatric liver transplant candidates.

The Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) score is intended to determine priority for children awaiting liver transplantation. This study examines the impact of PELD's incorporation of "growth failure" as a threshold variable, defined as having weight or height <2 standard deviations below the age and gender norm (z-score <2). First, we demonstrate the "growth failure gap" created by PELD's current calculation methods, in which children have z-scores <2 but do not meet PELD's growth failure criteria and thus lose 6-7 PELD points. Second, we utilized United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data to investigate the impact of this "growth failure gap." Among 3291 pediatric liver transplant candidates, 26% met PELD-defined growth failure, and 17% fell in the growth failure gap. Children in the growth failure gap had a higher risk of waitlist mortality than those without growth failure (adjusted subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.05-3.02, P = .03). They also had a higher risk of posttransplant mortality (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.32, P = .03). For children without PELD exception points (n = 1291), waitlist mortality risk nearly tripled for those in the gap (SHR 2.89, 95% CI 1.39-6.01, P = .005). Current methods for determining growth failure in PELD disadvantage candidates arbitrarily and increase their waitlist mortality risk. PELD should be revised to correct this disparity.

Swenson SM ，Roberts JP ，Rhee S ，Perito ER ... -  《-》

Functional status at listing predicts waitlist and posttransplant mortality in pediatric liver transplant candidates.

Functional impairment is associated with mortality in adult liver transplant candidates. This has not been studied in pediatric liver transplant candidates. United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files were used to investigate functional status, waitlist mortality, and posttransplant outcomes in children younger than 18 years who were waitlisted in 2006-2016 for primary liver transplant. Functional status was categorized, by using the Lansky Play-Performance Scale (LPPS), as normal/good (80-100), moderately impaired (50-70), or severely impaired (10-40) by center assessment. Among 3250 children not listed as Status 1A, 62% had an LPPS score of 80-100, 25% had a score of 50-70, and 13% had a score of 10-40 at listing. Children with an LPPS score of 10-40 at listing were more likely to die while on the waitlist (standardized hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.13, P = .02) in analyses adjusting for being on a ventilator, breathing support, or dialysis and other illness severity measures. For the 2565 children transplanted, an LPPS score of 10-40 at listing drastically increased mortality risk by 1 year posttransplant (hazard ratio 5.77, 95% confidence interval 3.05-10.91, P < .0005). LPPS scores of 10-40 and 50-70 both increased the risk of graft loss by 1 year. Functional status is an independent predictor of waitlist and posttransplant mortality in pediatric liver transplant candidates. Validated tools for the assessment of functional status in these children would improve our ability to predict mortality risk-and to appropriately prioritize them for transplant.

Perito ER ，Bucuvalas J ，Lai JC 《-》

Excess waitlist mortality among candidates for multivisceral liver-intestine transplant in acuity circle allocation.

Candidates for multivisceral transplant (MVT) have experienced decreased access to transplant in recent years. Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, transplant and waiting list outcomes for MVT (ie, liver-intestine, liver-intestine-pancreas, and liver-intestine-kidney-pancreas) candidates listed between February 4, 2018, and February 3, 2022, were analyzed, including model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease and exception scores by era (before and after acuity circle [AC] implementation on February 4, 2020) and age group (pediatric and adult). Of 284 MVT waitlist registrations (45.6% pediatric), fewer had exception points at listing post-AC compared to pre-AC (10.0% vs 19.1%), and they were less likely to receive transplant (19.1% vs 35.9% at 90 days; 35.7% vs 57.2% at 1 year). Of 177 MVT recipients, exception points at transplant were more common post-AC compared to pre-AC (30.8% vs 20.2%). Postpolicy, adult MVT candidates were more likely to be removed due to death/too sick compared with liver-alone candidates (13.5% vs 5.6% at 90 days; 24.2% vs 9.8% at 1 year), whereas no excess waitlist mortality was observed among pediatric MVT candidates. Under current allocation policy, multivisceral candidates experience inferior waitlist outcomes compared with liver-alone candidates. Clarification of guidance around submission and approval of multivisceral exception requests may help improve their access to transplantation and achieve equity between multivisceral and liver-alone candidates on the liver transplant waiting list.

Kwong AJ ，Schnellinger E ，Foutz J ，Cafarella M ，Nagai S ，Biggins SW ，Pomposelli J ，Trotter J ... -  《-》