Sequential Use of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors in Japanese Patients With ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

Second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, such as alectinib and ceritinib, have recently been approved for treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An optimal strategy for using 2 or more ALK inhibitors has not been established. We sought to investigate the clinical impact of sequential use of ALK inhibitors on these tumors in clinical practice. Patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated from May 2010 to January 2016 at the National Cancer Center Hospital were identified, and their outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. Fifty-nine patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC had been treated and 37 cases were assessable. Twenty-six received crizotinib, 21 received alectinib, and 13 (35.1%) received crizotinib followed by alectinib. Response rates and median progression-free survival (PFS) on crizotinib and alectinib (after crizotinib failure) were 53.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.7%-80.9%) and 38.4% (95% CI, 12.0%-64.9%), and 10.7 (95% CI, 5.3-14.7) months and 16.6 (95% CI, 2.9-not calculable), respectively. The median PFS of patients on sequential therapy was 35.2 months (95% CI, 12.7 months-not calculable). The 5-year survival rate of ALK-rearranged patients who received 2 sequential ALK inhibitors from diagnosis was 77.8% (95% CI, 36.5%-94.0%). The combined PFS and 5-year survival rates in patients who received sequential ALK inhibitors were encouraging. Making full use of multiple ALK inhibitors might be important to prolonging survival in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Asao T ，Fujiwara Y ，Itahashi K ，Kitahara S ，Goto Y ，Horinouchi H ，Kanda S ，Nokihara H ，Yamamoto N ，Takahashi K ，Ohe Y ... -  《-》

Progression-Free and Overall Survival of Patients With ALK Rearrangement-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated Sequentially With Crizotinib and Alectinib.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show marked therapeutic efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-ALK fusion gene. The effect on overall survival (OS) of sequential treatment with the first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs crizotinib and alectinib, respectively, has remained unknown. We have examined the clinical outcome of such sequential treatment in a retrospective analysis of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Eleven patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with crizotinib followed by alectinib were identified. The progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for these patients were determined from a retrospective review of their medical records. The median PFS on crizotinib or alectinib was 6.1 months (range, 1.0-15.4 months) and 15.2 months (range, 1.0-28.3 months), respectively. The median combined PFS for both crizotinib and alectinib was 18.2 months (range, 10.4-43.7 months). Crizotinib was continued beyond radiographic evidence of progressive disease in 6 of the 11 patients, with a median duration of postprogression crizotinib treatment of 9.4 months (range, 0-20.5 months). The OS period from the diagnosis of metastatic disease or the initiation of crizotinib treatment was 51.1 months (range, 20.9-69.5 months) and 48.6 months (range, 19.8-50.1 months), respectively. Our retrospective study has revealed durable survival for alectinib treatment after crizotinib failure in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Watanabe S ，Hayashi H ，Okamoto K ，Fujiwara K ，Hasegawa Y ，Kaneda H ，Tanaka K ，Takeda M ，Nakagawa K ... -  《-》

Sequential Therapy with Crizotinib and Alectinib in ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Alectinib and crizotinib have been approved for the therapy of NSCLC caused by anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) rearrangement. The effect of alectinib or crizotinib on overall survival (OS) in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC remains unknown. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to compare OS between patients receiving alectinib and crizotinib and between patients treated with alectinib and those treated sequentially with crizotinib and then alectinib after crizotinib failure. The time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were compared. Sixty-one patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC were enrolled. Forty-six patients were treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors (31 with crizotinib, 28 with alectinib, and 13 with both ALK inhibitors). The response rate was 66.7% for the crizotinib-treated group and 80.8% for the alectinib-treated group. Among all patients, TTF and PFS were significantly prolonged in the alectinib-treated group compared with in the crizotinib-treated group. Subgroup analyses revealed significantly prolonged TTF for alectinib compared with crizotinib therapy in the ALK inhibitor-naive population. OS was significantly longer in the alectinib-treated group than in the crizotinib-treated group. The TTF and OS of patients treated sequentially with crizotinib and then with alectinib after crizotinib failure tended to be longer than those of patients treated with alectinib alone. Therapy with alectinib alone was significantly superior to therapy with crizotinib alone in terms of TTF, PFS, and OS, and sequential therapy with crizotinib and alectinib after crizotinib failure tended to provide a better OS benefit than did therapy with alectinib alone in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. However, large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Ito K ，Hataji O ，Kobayashi H ，Fujiwara A ，Yoshida M ，D'Alessandro-Gabazza CN ，Itani H ，Tanigawa M ，Ikeda T ，Fujiwara K ，Fujimoto H ，Kobayashi T ，Gabazza EC ，Taguchi O ，Yamamoto N ... -  《-》

Safety and activity of alectinib against systemic disease and brain metastases in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (AF-002JG): results from the dose-finding portion of a phase 1/2 study.

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ALK rearrangements generally have a progression-free survival of 8-11 months while on treatment with the ALK inhibitor crizotinib. However, resistance inevitably develops, with the brain a common site of progression. More potent ALK inhibitors with consistently demonstrable CNS activity and good tolerability are needed urgently. Alectinib is a novel, highly selective, and potent ALK inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in patients with crizotinib-naive ALK-rearranged NSCLC. We did a phase 1/2 study of alectinib to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of the drug and examine its activity in patients resistant or intolerant to crizotinib. We enrolled patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC who progressed on or were intolerant to crizotinib. We administered various oral doses of alectinib (300-900 mg twice a day) during the dose-escalation portion of the study (phase 1), to ascertain the recommended dose for phase 2. We used Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (version 1.1) to investigate the activity of alectinib in all patients with a baseline scan and at least one post-treatment scan (CT or MRI), with central radiological review of individuals with brain metastases. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of alectinib. Here, we present data for the phase 1 portion of the study, the primary objective of which was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose; phase 2 is ongoing. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01588028. 47 patients were enrolled. Alectinib was well tolerated, with the most common adverse events being fatigue (14 [30%]; all grade 1-2), myalgia (eight [17%]; all grade 1-2), and peripheral oedema (seven [15%] grade 1-2, one [2%] grade 3). Dose-limiting toxic effects were recorded in two patients in the cohort receiving alectinib 900 mg twice a day; one individual had grade 3 headache and the other had grade 3 neutropenia. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were increased levels of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (two [4%]), a reduction in the number of neutrophils (two [4%]), and hypophosphataemia (two [4%]). Three patients reported four grade 4 serious adverse events that were deemed unrelated to alectinib: acute renal failure; pleural effusion and pericardial effusion; and brain metastasis. At data cut-off (median follow-up 126 days [IQR 84-217]), 44 patients could be assessed for activity. Investigator-assessed objective responses were noted in 24 (55%) patients, with a confirmed complete response in one (2%), a confirmed partial response in 14 (32%), and an unconfirmed partial response in nine (20%). 16 (36%) patients had stable disease; the remaining four (9%) had progressive disease. Of 21 patients with CNS metastases at baseline, 11 (52%) had an objective response; six (29%) had a complete response (three unconfirmed) and five (24%) had a partial response (one unconfirmed); eight (38%) patients had stable disease and the remaining two (10%) had progressive disease. Pharmacokinetic data indicated that mean exposure (AUC0-10) after multiple doses of alectinib (300-600 mg twice a day) was dose-dependent. Alectinib was well tolerated, with promising antitumour activity in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC resistant to crizotinib, including those with CNS metastases. On the basis of activity, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data, we chose alectinib 600 mg twice a day as the recommended dose for phase 2. Chugai Pharmaceuticals, F Hoffmann La-Roche.

Gadgeel SM ，Gandhi L ，Riely GJ ，Chiappori AA ，West HL ，Azada MC ，Morcos PN ，Lee RM ，Garcia L ，Yu L ，Boisserie F ，Di Laurenzio L ，Golding S ，Sato J ，Yokoyama S ，Tanaka T ，Ou SH ... -  《-》

Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Peters S ，Camidge DR ，Shaw AT ，Gadgeel S ，Ahn JS ，Kim DW ，Ou SI ，Pérol M ，Dziadziuszko R ，Rosell R ，Zeaiter A ，Mitry E ，Golding S ，Balas B ，Noe J ，Morcos PN ，Mok T ，ALEX Trial Investigators ... -  《-》