Distance from a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A proxy for poor cervical cancer outcomes?

To evaluate the potential relationship between outcomes in cervical cancer patients based on distance from our Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). A retrospective cohort study of cervical cancer patients was performed. Abstracted data included: demographics, clinicopathologic variables, treatment, and survival. Analyses both by quartiles and distance <100 and ≥100miles from our institution were performed. Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.2. 390 patients living a median distance of 58.1miles (range 1.2-571miles) from our CCC were identified. Patients were generally white (n=249), non-smokers (n=226), with Stage IB disease (n=222), squamous histology (n=295) and underwent primary surgical therapy (n=229). Patients were divided into both quartiles as well as two strata: <100 and ≥100miles for comparison. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) favored patients living closer to our center with a lower median OS for patients living ≥100miles (65.4vs. 99.4months; p=0.040). Cox proportional hazard modeling noted that advanced stage was predictive of inferior PFS and OS, while other clinical covariates including age, BMI, race, smoking status and histology had a variable impact on outcomes and distance >100miles was associated with a higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]=1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.54). Overall survival for patients living >100miles from our CCC was worse when compared to patients in closer proximity. Outreach efforts and utilization of navigators may help decrease the impact of geographic and racial disparities on outcomes.

Barrington DA ，Dilley SE ，Landers EE ，Thomas ED ，Boone JD ，Straughn JM Jr ，McGwin G Jr ，Leath CA 3rd ... -  《-》

Does diabetes mellitus have an impact on the prognosis for patients with cervical cancer?

To evaluate the impact of comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) on prognoses among patients with cervical cancer. We analyzed cervical cancer outcomes in patients who treated in two hospitals retrospectively. Patients were divided into those with DM and those without. Clinicopathologic parameters, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated. Of the 494 patients, 50 had DM. These were more likely to be older than those in the non-DM group and their body mass index (BMI) was higher. They showed higher levels of tumor markers and had more combined diseases. They were less likely to have had surgical treatment. Among these patients, 12 (24%) experienced a recurrence (hazard ratio, HR, 1.484; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.746-2.951). Differences in DFS did not show statistical significance. In the OS analysis, 11 (22%) in the DM group and 62 (14%) in the non-DM group died (HR, 1.239; 95% CI, 0.606-2.533). No statistically significant differences were also observed for cancer-specific death (HR, 1.246; 95% CI, 0.567-2.737). Those with DM and an adenocarcinoma tended to have an increased risk of dying compared with the non-DM patients with an adenocarcinoma (HR, 3.673; 95% CI, 0.990-13.625), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.0518). Diabetes mellitus did not have an impact on the prognosis for patients with cervical cancers. In those with an adenocarcinoma, patients with diabetes tended to have an increased risk of dying compared with the non-DM group, but this difference was not statistically significant.

In Choi J ，Chang HK ，Lee DW ，Lee KH ，Park JS ，Lee HN ... -  《-》

Impact of histological subtype on survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer that were treated with definitive radiotherapy: adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma.

To compare the survival outcomes of patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/ASC) among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer that were treated with definitive radiotherapy. The baseline characteristics and outcome data of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who were treated with definitive radiotherapy between November 1993 and February 2014 were collected and retrospectively reviewed. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to investigate the prognostic significance of AC/ASC histology. The patients with AC/ASC of the cervix exhibited significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (p=0.004) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.002) than the patients with SCC of the cervix. Multivariate analysis showed that AC/ASC histology was an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS. Among the patients who displayed AC/ASC histology, larger tumor size, older age, and incomplete response to radiotherapy were found to be independent prognostic factors. PFS was inversely associated with the number of poor prognostic factors the patients exhibited (the estimated 1-year PFS rates; 100.0%, 77.8%, 42.8%, 0.0% for 0, 1, 2, 3 factors, respectively). Locally advanced cervical cancer patients with AC/ASC histology experience significantly worse survival outcomes than those with SCC. Further clinical studies are warranted to develop a concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) protocol that is specifically tailored to locally advanced cervical AC/ASC.

Yokoi E ，Mabuchi S ，Takahashi R ，Matsumoto Y ，Kuroda H ，Kozasa K ，Kimura T ... -  《-》

Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Procedural volume is associated with outcomes for many surgical interventions. Little is known about the association between volume and outcomes of radiation. We examined the association between treatment center and hospital volume and outcomes for women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radiation. Women with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer treated with primary radiation from 1998 to 2011 and recorded in the National Cancer Database were examined. Hospital volume was estimated as the mean annualized volume, while center-specific effects on care were examined using a hospital-specific random effect. Multivariable regression models adjusted for metrics of treatment quality were used to estimate survival. 20,766 patients treated at 1115 hospitals were identified. The median follow-up was 24.2months while 5-year survival was 36.5% (95% CI, 35.6-37.4%). Higher hospital volume was associated with receipt of brachytherapy (P<0.05), but had no effect on use of chemotherapy. In a multivariable model accounting for clinical and demographic factors as well as quality of care, hospital volume was not associated with survival (P=0.25). The specific hospital in which patients received care was the strongest predictor of survival (P<0.0001) followed by stage, year of diagnosis and treatment quality (P<0.0001 for all). The hospital-specific effect on mortality expressed as a hazard ratio, ranged from 0.66 to 1.53 across hospitals. For locally advanced cervical cancer, hospital volume has a minimal impact on outcome; however, the specific center in which care is delivered is strongly associated with survival.

Wright JD ，Huang Y ，Ananth CV ，Tergas AI ，Duffy C ，Deutsch I ，Burke WM ，Hou JY ，Neugut AI ，Hershman DL ... -  《-》

Association between cigarette smoking and prognosis in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Waggoner SE ，Darcy KM ，Fuhrman B ，Parham G ，Lucci J 3rd ，Monk BJ ，Moore DH ，Gynecologic Oncology Group ... -  《GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY》