Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval in women who plan postpartum LARC: a retrospective study.
Pregnancies conceived after a short interpregnancy interval (IPI), within 18 months of delivery, and unintended pregnancies are both associated with health risks. We studied risk factors for conception after a short IPI among postpartum women who plan long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).
A retrospective review of a cohort of women who delivered at University of Illinois Hospital from 2005 to 2010 and were discharged with a plan for interval LARC was performed. Outcomes were (1) attendance at a postpartum visit (PPV), (2) LARC placement (3) and conception after a short IPI. We compared variables using chi-squared test, Student's t tests and multivariable logistic regression.
Of 3548 women, 62.0% attended a PPV, 36.5% received LARC and 11.4% conceived after a short IPI. After logistic regression, women who were multiparous [odds ratio (OR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.91] or chose a temporary contraceptive "bridge" to LARC (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.94) were less likely to attend their PPV. Women who missed their PPV (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.05-0.08) or chose a bridge (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88) were less likely to receive LARC. Finally, women who did not receive LARC (OR 4.8, 95% CI 3.50-6.70), were multiparous (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.32-2.15) or teenaged (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.61-2.79) were more likely to conceive after a short IPI.
Women who receive postpartum LARC are less likely to become pregnant after a short IPI. Missing the PPV, multiparity and plan for a contraceptive bridge may all contribute to a patient not receiving planned LARC.
Efforts to decrease unintended pregnancy after a short IPI should focus on decreasing barriers to planned postpartum LARC. Provision of temporary bridge contraception until interval LARC may not mitigate the significant barriers associated with interval postpartum placement protocols.
Harney C
,Dude A
,Haider S
《-》
Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.
Repeat pregnancies after a short interpregnancy interval are common and are associated with negative maternal and infant health outcomes. Few studies have examined the relative effectiveness of postpartum contraceptive choices.
We aimed to determine the initiation trends and relative effectiveness of postpartum contraceptive methods, with typical use, on prevention of short delivery intervals (≤27 months) among women with access to universal healthcare, including coverage that entails no co-payments and allows unlimited contraceptive method switching.
This retrospective cohort study included women who were enrolled in the United States military healthcare system who were admitted for childbirth between October 2010 and March 2015, with ≥6 months postpartum enrollment. With the use of insurance records, we determined the most effective contraceptive method initiated during the first 6 months after delivery, even if subsequently discontinued. Rates of interdelivery intervals of ≤27 months, as proxies for interpregnancy intervals ≤18 months, were determined with the use of the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Women who were disenrolled, who reached 27 months after delivery without another delivery, or who reached the end of the study period were censored. The influence of sociodemographic variables and contraceptive choices on time to subsequent delivery was evaluated by Cox regression analysis, which accounted for a possible correlation among multiple deliveries by an individual woman.
During the study timeframe, 373,840 women experienced a total of 450,875 postpartum intervals. Women averaged 27 (standard deviation, 5.3) years of age at the time of delivery; 33.9% of them were <25 years old; 15.5% of them were active duty service members, and 31.6% of them had insurance sponsors of junior enlisted rank (which suggests lower income). Postpartum contraceptive methods that were initiated included self or partner sterilization (7%), intrauterine device (13.5%), etonogestrel implant (3.4%), depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5%), and pill, patch, or ring (36.8%). Furthermore, 36.7% of them did not initiate a prescription method. Etonogestrel implant initiation increased from 1.7% of postpartum women in the first year of our study to 5.3% in the final year. The estimated short interdelivery interval rate was 17.4%, but rates varied with contraceptive method: 1% with sterilization, 6% with long-acting reversible contraception, 12% with depot medroxyprogesterone, 21% with pill, patch, or ring, and 23% with no prescription method. In a multivariable analysis, the adjusted hazard of a short interdelivery interval was highest among women who were younger, on active duty, or with officer insurance sponsors. Compared with nonuse of any prescription contraceptive, the use of an intrauterine device reduced the hazard of a subsequent delivery (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.20), as did etonogestrel implant (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.23); the pill, patch, or ring had less effect (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.81).
Postpartum initiation of long-acting reversible contraception is highly effective at the prevention of short interdelivery intervals, whereas pill, patch, or ring methods are associated with rates of short interdelivery intervals similar to users of no prescription contraception. This study supports long-acting reversible contraception as first-line recommendations for postpartum women who wish to retain fertility but avoid early repeat pregnancy.
Brunson MR
,Klein DA
,Olsen CH
,Weir LF
,Roberts TA
... -
《-》
Characteristics associated with interest in long-acting reversible contraception in a postpartum population.
Short interpregnancy intervals lead to adverse perinatal outcomes and could be prevented with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in the postpartum period. The primary objective of this study was to assess which baseline characteristics are associated with the intent to use LARC among postpartum women.
This study was a substudy of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial. Eight hundred women completed a pre-intervention survey of demographics and reproductive health history and intentions. We estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs) of intent to use LARC for baseline characteristics of interest.
Three hundred three postpartum women (38%) intended to use LARC. Two out of 10 baseline characteristics were significantly associated with intent to use LARC: not trying for pregnancy at time of conception [adjusted RR, 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-2.1] and no desire for another pregnancy within 2 years (adjusted RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8).
High interest in LARC exists among postpartum women, particularly among women with a recent unintended pregnancy and women who do not desire pregnancy for at least 2 years. Past and future pregnancy intentions should be incorporated into future models and frameworks that evaluate postpartum contraceptive choice. Educational intervention studies are also needed to assess if LARC interest can be increased among postpartum women who are less likely to intend to use LARC but at risk for future adverse perinatal outcomes.
Tang JH
,Dominik R
,Re S
,Brody S
,Stuart GS
... -
《-》
Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception.
Contraception use among postpartum women is important to prevent unintended pregnancies and optimize birth spacing. Long-acting reversible contraception, including intrauterine devices and implants, is highly effective, yet compared to less effective methods utilization rates are low.
We sought to estimate prevalence of long-acting reversible contraception use among postpartum women and examine factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception use among those using any reversible contraception.
We analyzed 2012-2015 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a population-based survey among women with recent live births. We included data from 37 sites that achieved the minimum overall response rate threshold for data release. We estimated the prevalence of long-acting reversible contraception use in our sample (n = 143,335). We examined maternal factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception use among women using reversible contraception (n = 97,013) using multivariable logistic regression (long-acting reversible contraception vs other type of reversible contraception) and multinomial regression (long-acting reversible contraception vs other hormonal contraception and long-acting reversible contraception vs other nonhormonal contraception).
The prevalence of long-acting reversible contraception use overall was 15.3%. Among postpartum women using reversible contraception, 22.5% reported long-acting reversible contraception use, which varied by site, ranging from 11.2% in New Jersey to 37.6% in Alaska. Factors associated with postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use vs use of another reversible contraceptive method included age ≤24 years (adjusted odds ratio = 1.43; 95% confidence interval = 1.33-1.54) and ≥35 years (adjusted odds ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.96) vs 25-34 years; public insurance (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15; 95% confidence interval = 1.08-1.24) and no insurance (adjusted odds ratio = 0.73; 95% confidence interval = 0.55-0.96) vs private insurance at delivery; having a recent unintended pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio = 1.44; 95% confidence interval = 1.34-1.54) or being unsure about the recent pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio = 1.29; 95% confidence interval = 1.18-1.40) vs recent pregnancy intended; having ≥1 previous live birth (adjusted odds ratio = 1.40; 95% confidence interval = 1.31-1.48); and having a postpartum check-up after recent live birth (adjusted odds ratio = 2.70; 95% confidence interval = 2.35-3.11). Hispanic and non-Hispanic black postpartum women had a higher rate of long-acting reversible contraception use (26.6% and 23.4%, respectively) compared to non-Hispanic white women (21.5%), and there was significant race/ethnicity interaction with educational level.
Nearly 1 in 6 (15.3%) postpartum women with a recent live birth and nearly 1 in 4 (22.5%) postpartum women using reversible contraception reported long-acting reversible contraception use. Our analysis suggests that factors such as age, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, parity, intendedness of recent pregnancy, and postpartum visit attendance may be associated with postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use. Ensuring all postpartum women have access to the full range of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception, is important to prevent unintended pregnancy and optimize birth spacing. Contraceptive access may be improved by public health efforts and programs that address barriers in the postpartum period, including increasing awareness of the availability, effectiveness, and safety of long-acting reversible contraception (and other methods), as well as providing full reimbursement for contraceptive services and removal of administrative and logistical barriers.
Oduyebo T
,Zapata LB
,Boutot ME
,Tepper NK
,Curtis KM
,D'Angelo DV
,Marchbanks PA
,Whiteman MK
... -
《-》
Barriers to Receiving Long-acting Reversible Contraception in the Postpartum Period.
To assess why postpartum women who desired long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) did not receive it in the postpartum period and to assess which contraceptive methods they were using instead.
This was a subgroup analysis of 324 women enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial to receive or not receive an educational LARC script during their postpartum hospitalization. Participants in this subgroup analysis stated that they were either using LARC (n = 114) or interested in using LARC (n = 210) during a follow-up survey completed after their scheduled 6-week postpartum visit. Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to assess for characteristics associated with using LARC by the time of the follow-up survey.
Women who were interested in LARC but not using it were more likely to be multiparous (relative risk [RR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.19-2.11) and to have missed their postpartum visit (RR, 25.88; 95% CI, 3.75-178.44) compared with those using LARC. Among the interested 210 who were not using LARC, the most common reasons provided for non-use were that they were told to come back for another insertion visit (45%), missed the postpartum visit (26%), and could not afford LARC (11%). The most common contraceptive methods used instead of LARC were barrier methods (42%) and abstinence (19%); 18% used no contraceptive method.
Two-thirds (65%) of postpartum women who desired to use LARC did not receive it in the postpartum period and used less effective contraceptive methods. Increasing access to immediate postpartum LARC and eliminating two-visit protocols for LARC insertion may increase postpartum LARC use. As the Affordable Care Act moves toward full implementation, it is necessary to understand the barriers that prevent interested patients from receiving LARC.
Zerden ML
,Tang JH
,Stuart GS
,Norton DR
,Verbiest SB
,Brody S
... -
《-》