Klinefelter syndrome and fertility: sperm preservation should not be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome.

Should fertility preservation be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome (KS)? Current evidence shows that fertility preservation should not be offered to adolescents with KS younger than 16 years because of lower retrieval rates for germ cells by testicular sperm extraction (TESE) compared with retrieval rates for adolescents and adults between 16 and 30 years. KS, the most common chromosomal disorder in men leading to non-obstructive azoospermia, is caused by the presence of at least one additional X chromosome. The onset of puberty in adolescents with KS leads to progressive degeneration of the testicular environment. The impact of the subsequent tissue degeneration on fertility potential of patients with KS is unknown, but in previous literature it has been suggested that fertility preservation should be started in adolescents as early as possible. However spermatozoa can be found by TESE in about 50% of adults with KS despite severe testicular degeneration. This review discusses the current evidence for fertility preservation in children and adolescents and possible prognostic markers for fertility treatment in KS. An extensive literature search was conducted, searching Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl and Web of Science from origin until April 2016 for 'Klinefelter syndrome' and 'fertility' and various synonyms. Titles and abstracts have been scanned manually by the authors for eligibility. In total 76 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion in this review. Information from the papers was extracted separately by two authors. Various studies have shown that pre-pubertal children with KS already have a reduced number of germ cells despite a normal hormonal profile during childhood. The presence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate of adolescents with KS is extremely rare. Using TESE, the retrieval rates of spermatozoa for adolescents younger than 16 years old are much lower (0-20%) compared with those for adolescents and young adults between 16 and 30 years old (40-70%). Although spermatogonia can be found by TESE in about half of the peri-pubertal adolescents, there are currently no clinically functional techniques for their future use. Children and adolescents need to be informed that early fertility preservation before the age of 16 cannot guarantee fertility later in life and may even reduce the chances for offspring by removing functional immature germ cells which may possibly develop into spermatozoa after puberty. Furthermore, except for the age of patients with KS, there are no identified factors that can reliably be used as a predictive marker for fertility preservation. Most of the evidence presented in this review is based on studies including a small number of adolescents with KS. Therefore, the studies may have been underpowered to detect clinically significant differences for their various outcomes, especially for potential predictive factors for fertility preservation, such as hormone levels. Furthermore, the population of patients with KS diagnosed during childhood might be different from the adult population with KS where the diagnosis is based on infertility. Results based on comparisons between the two groups must be interpreted with caution. Despite the limitations, this review summarizes the current evidence for managing fertility preservation in patients with KS to provide optimal health care. There was no funding for this study. S.F., Y.H., K.D., W.L.M.N., D.S., H.L.C.-v.d.G. and L.R. declare to have no conflicts of interests. D.D.M.B. reports grants from Merck Serono, grants from Ferring and grants from MSD, outside the submitted work. K.F. reports personal fees from MSD (commercial sponsor), personal fees from Ferring (commercial sponsor), grants from Merck-Serono (commercial sponsor), grants from Ferring (commercial sponsor) and grants from MSD (commercial sponsor), outside the submitted work.

Franik S ，Hoeijmakers Y ，D'Hauwers K ，Braat DD ，Nelen WL ，Smeets D ，Claahsen-van der Grinten HL ，Ramos L ，Fleischer K ... -  《-》

When does germ cell loss and fibrosis occur in patients with Klinefelter syndrome?

Van Saen D ，Vloeberghs V ，Gies I ，Mateizel I ，Sermon K ，De Schepper J ，Tournaye H ，Goossens E ... -  《-》

The feasibility of fertility preservation in adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome.

Rives N ，Milazzo JP ，Perdrix A ，Castanet M ，Joly-Hélas G ，Sibert L ，Bironneau A ，Way A ，Macé B ... -  《-》

Birth of 16 healthy children after ICSI in cases of nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome.

Greco E ，Scarselli F ，Minasi MG ，Casciani V ，Zavaglia D ，Dente D ，Tesarik J ，Franco G ... -  《-》

Age-related presence of spermatogonia in patients with Klinefelter syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Klinefelter syndrome (KS) has been defined by sex chromosome aneuploidies (classically 47, XXY) in the male patient. The peripubertal timeframe in KS patients has been associated with the initiation of progressive testicular fibrosis, loss of spermatogonial stem cells (SSC), hypogonadism and impaired fertility. Less than half of KS patients are positive for spermatozoa in the ejaculate or testis via semen analysis or testicular sperm extraction, respectively. However, the chance of finding spermatogonia including a sub-population of SSCs in KS testes has not been well defined. Given the recent demonstration of successful cell culture for mouse and human SSCs, it could be feasible to isolate and propagate SSCs and transplant the cells back to the patient or to differentiate them in vitro to haploid cells. The main objective of this study was to meta-analyse the currently available data from KS patients to identify the prevalence of KS patients with spermatogonia on testicular biopsy across four age groups (year): fetal/infantile (age ≤ 1), prepubertal (age 1 ≤ x ≤ 10), peripubertal/adolescent (age 10 < x < 18) and adult (age ≥ 18) ages. Additionally, the association of endocrine parameters with presence or absence of spermatogonia was tested to obtain a more powered analysis of whether FSH, LH, testosterone and inhibin B can serve as predictive markers for successful spermatogonia retrieval. A thorough Medline/PubMed search was conducted using the following search terms: 'Klinefelter, germ cells, spermatogenesis and spermatogonia', yielding results from 1 October 1965 to 3 February 2019. Relevant articles were added from the bibliographies of selected articles. Exclusion criteria included non-English language, abstracts only, non-human data and review papers. A total of 751 papers were identified with independent review returning 36 papers with relevant information for meta-analysis on 386 patients. For the most part, articles were case reports, case-controlled series and cohort studies (level IV-VI evidence). Spermatogonial cells were present in all of the fetal/infantile and 83% of the prepubertal patients' testes, and in 42.7% and 48.5% of the peripubertal and adult groups, respectively were positive for spermatogonia. Additionally, 26 of the 56 (46.4%) peripubertal/adolescent and 37 of the 152 (24.3%) adult patients negative for spermatozoa were positive for spermatogonia (P < 0.05). In peripubertal/adolescent patients, the mean ± SEM level for FSH was 12.88 ± 3.13 IU/L for spermatogonia positive patients and 30.42 ± 4.05 IU/L for spermatogonia negative patients (P = 0.001); the mean ± SEM level LH levels were 4.36 ± 1.31 and 11.43 ± 1.68 IU/L for spermatogonia positive and negative, respectively (P < 0.01); the mean ± SEM level for testosterone levels were 5.04 ± 1.37 and 9.05 ± 0.94 nmol/L (equal to 145 ± 40 and 261 ± 27 and ng/dl) for the spermatogonia positive and negative groups, respectively (P < 0.05), while the difference in means for inhibin B was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). A similar analysis in the adult group showed the FSH levels in spermatogonia positive and negative patients to be 25.77 ± 2.78 and 36.12 ± 2.90 IU/L, respectively (mean ± SEM level, P < 0.05). All other hormone measurements were not statistically significantly different between groups. While azoospermia is a common finding in the KS patient population, many patients are positive for spermatogonia. Recent advances in SSC in vitro propagation, transplantation and differentiation open new avenues for these patients for fertility preservation. This would offer a new subset of KS patients a chance of biological paternity. Data surrounding the hormonal profiles of KS patients and their relation to fertility should be interpreted with caution as a paucity of adequately powered data exists. Future work is needed to clarify the utility of FSH, LH, testosterone and inhibin B as biomarkers for successful retrieval of spermatogonia.

Deebel NA ，Galdon G ，Zarandi NP ，Stogner-Underwood K ，Howards S ，Lovato J ，Kogan S ，Atala A ，Lue Y ，Sadri-Ardekani H ... -  《-》