Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy, high-dose rate brachytherapy, and low-dose rate permanent seeds implant for localized prostate cancer.

To investigate the dosimetric and radiobiological differences among volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, and low-dose rate (LDR) permanent seeds implant for localized prostate cancer. A total of 10 patients with localized prostate cancer were selected for this study. VMAT, HDR brachytherapy, and LDR permanent seeds implant plans were created for each patient. For VMAT, planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the clinical target volume plus a margin of 5mm. Rectum, bladder, urethra, and femoral heads were considered as organs at risk. A 78Gy in 39 fractions were prescribed for PTV. For HDR and LDR plans, the dose prescription was D90 of 34Gy in 8.5Gy per fraction, and 145Gy to clinical target volume, respectively. The dose and dose volume parameters were evaluated for target, organs at risk, and normal tissue. Physical dose was converted to dose based on 2-Gy fractions (equivalent dose in 2Gy per fraction, EQD2) for comparison of 3 techniques. HDR and LDR significantly reduced the dose to rectum and bladder compared with VMAT. The Dmean (EQD2) of rectum decreased 22.36Gy in HDR and 17.01Gy in LDR from 30.24Gy in VMAT, respectively. The Dmean (EQD2) of bladder decreased 6.91Gy in HDR and 2.53Gy in LDR from 13.46Gy in VMAT. For the femoral heads and normal tissue, the mean doses were also significantly reduced in both HDR and LDR compared with VMAT. For the urethra, the mean dose (EQD2) was 80.26, 70.23, and 104.91Gy in VMAT, HDR, and LDR brachytherapy, respectively. For localized prostate cancer, both HDR and LDR brachytherapy were clearly superior in the sparing of rectum, bladder, femoral heads, and normal tissue compared with VMAT. HDR provided the advantage in sparing of urethra compared with VMAT and LDR.

Yang R ，Zhao N ，Liao A ，Wang H ，Qu A ... -  《-》

Dosimetric considerations to determine the optimal technique for localized prostate cancer among external photon, proton, or carbon-ion therapy and high-dose-rate or low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

To assess the dosimetric differences among volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), scanned proton therapy (intensity-modulated proton therapy, IMPT), scanned carbon-ion therapy (intensity-modulated carbon-ion therapy, IMIT), and low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) treatment of localized prostate cancer. Ten patients were considered for this planning study. For external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), planning target volume was created by adding a margin of 5 mm (lateral/anterior-posterior) and 8 mm (superior-inferior) to the clinical target volume. Bladder wall (BW), rectal wall (RW), femoral heads, urethra, and pelvic tissue were considered as organs at risk. For VMAT and IMPT, 78 Gy(relative biological effectiveness, RBE)/2 Gy were prescribed. The IMIT was based on 66 Gy(RBE)/20 fractions. The clinical target volume planning aims for HDR-BT ((192)Ir) and LDR-BT ((125)I) were D(90%) ≥34 Gy in 8.5 Gy per fraction and D(90%) ≥145 Gy. Both physical and RBE-weighted dose distributions for protons and carbon-ions were converted to dose distributions based on 2-Gy(IsoE) fractions. From these dose distributions various dose and dose-volume parameters were extracted. Rectal wall exposure 30-70 Gy(IsoE) was reduced for IMIT, LDR-BT, and HDR-BT when compared with VMAT and IMPT. The high-dose region of the BW dose-volume histogram above 50 Gy(IsoE) of IMPT resembled the VMAT shape, whereas all other techniques showed a significantly lower high-dose region. For all 3 EBRT techniques similar urethra D(mean) around 74 Gy(IsoE) were obtained. The LDR-BT results were approximately 30 Gy(IsoE) higher, HDR-BT 10 Gy(IsoE) lower. Normal tissue and femoral head sparing was best with BT. Despite the different EBRT prescription and fractionation schemes, the high-dose regions of BW and RW expressed in Gy(IsoE) were on the same order of magnitude. Brachytherapy techniques were clearly superior in terms of BW, RW, and normal tissue sparing, with lowest values for HDR-BT.

Georg D ，Hopfgartner J ，Gòra J ，Kuess P ，Kragl G ，Berger D ，Hegazy N ，Goldner G ，Georg P ... -  《-》

A feasibility study of using advanced external beam techniques to create a vaginal cuff brachytherapy-like endometrial boost plan.

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of using advanced external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) planning techniques for creating plans that could be used as a possible alternative for high-dose rate (HDR) vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCBT) boost in treating endometrial cancer. The computed tomography (CT) images of a total of 4 female patients who had endometrial cancer treated with HDR-VCBT were selected for this study. A typical HDR-VCBT target volume, 0.5-cm-thick shell volume around the cylinder applicator in the prescribed treatment length was contoured and used as the planning target volume (PTV) in both the HDR VCBT and the EBRT VCBT-like plans. HDR-VCBT plans were made based on the clinical protocol, 6 Gy given at the cylinder surface. The EBRT plans were generated using either a 7-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or a 2-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques for different cylinder sizes and treatment lengths, with the prescription dose of 5 Gy. Organs at risk (OARs) such as bladder, femoral heads, rectum, and sigmoid were also contoured and used in dosimetric evaluations. Dose-to-target metrics included mean dose, the dose covering 90% of target volume (D90) and the percentage of target volume covered by 90% of prescription dose (V90 or V13.5 Gy). Dose to OAR metrics included the maximum dose received by 0.1 cc (D0.1cc), 1.0 cc (D1.0cc), and 2.0 cc (D2.0cc) of OARs. These metrics were calculated and compared between all techniques. After the EBRT plans were normalized to achieve a comparable mean dose to target as HDR-VCBT, the EBRT plans were found to have superior target coverage and increased dose homogeneity compared with HDR-VCBT. V90s of EBRT plans were 95%, compared with 50% to 58% of the HDR plans. However, D0.1cc, D1.0cc, and D2.0cc of OARs were 2% to 38% lower in HDR-VCBT than in EBRT. Although HDR-VCBT plans demonstrated superior normal tissue sparing, both EBRT and HDR-VCBT plans produce plans that met clinical dose constraints on normal tissues. Advanced EBRT techniques such as IMRT and VMAT are capable of making plans, which closely resemble HDR-VCBT. Although the doses of OARs are greater in EBRT than in HDR-VCBT, the prescription dose coverage and dose homogeneity of the EBRT plans are greater than that of HDR-VCBT plans at the similar mean dose, and the OAR dose is still acceptable with EBRT plans. The detailed dosimetric approaches are provided in the study.

Grelewicz Z ，Zerrusen B ，Sathiaseelan V ，Zhang H ... -  《-》

Dosimetric comparison between treatment plans of patients treated with low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate interstitial prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy: Initial findings of a randomized clinical trial.

The aim of this study was to compare the dosimetry of intraoperative dose plans of prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (BT). A randomized clinical trial was initiated at our institution to compare the results and side effects of LDR and HDR BT as monotherapy in the treatment of early, organ-confined prostate cancer patients. Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive HDR afterloading BT with one fraction of 19 Gy or permanent LDR 125I seed BT with 145 Gy. Inverse optimization algorithms were used for planning. Stranded seeds were implanted using live ultrasound imaging after preimplant treatment planning. Final dosimetry of HDR treatments was based on updated needle and contour positions. Statistical comparisons with nonparametric test were performed between the corresponding dose-volume parameters. The V100 and V150 were 99% and 61%, respectively, for LDR, whereas 98% and 32% for HDR treatments. The D90 was less for HDR (122% vs. 110%). The dose distributions were more homogeneous and conformal with HDR technique (dose homogeneity index, 0.39 vs. 0.67; conformal index, 0.65 vs. 0.80). The urethra and rectum received significantly less dose with HDR. The D10 and D30 for urethra were 133% and 128%, respectively, for LDR and 114% and 111% for HDR treatments. The [Formula: see text] for rectum was 68% and 55% for LDR and HDR technique, respectively. Both techniques provided acceptable target volume coverage with a slightly higher value with the LDR technique. The dose distributions were more homogeneous and conformal, and both urethra and rectum were better protected with the HDR technique.

Major T ，Polgár C ，Jorgo K ，Stelczer G ，Ágoston P ... -  《-》

Dosimetric comparison of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a boost to the prostate.

Hermesse J ，Biver S ，Jansen N ，Lenaerts E ，Nickers P ... -  《-》