High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Bag-Valve-Mask for Preoxygenation Before Intubation in Subjects With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.

Critically ill patients with respiratory failure undergoing intubation have an increased risk of hypoxemia-related complications. Delivering oxygen via a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has theoretical advantages and is increasingly used. This study was conducted to compare HFNC with bag-valve-mask (BVM) for preoxygenation and to assess oxygenation during intubation in subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure. This study was a randomized controlled trial including 40 critically ill subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure who received either HFNC or BVM for preoxygenation before intubation in the ICU. The primary outcome was the mean lowest SpO2 during intubation. The mean lowest SpO2 during intubation was 89 ± 18% in the HFNC group and 86 ± 11% in the BVM group (P = .56). In subjects receiving HFNC, a significant increase in SpO2 after preoxygenation was only seen in those previously receiving low-flow oxygen (P = .007), whereas there was no significant difference in SpO2 in subjects previously receiving noninvasive ventilation or HFNC (P = .73). During the 1 min of apnea after the induction of anesthesia, SpO2 dropped significantly in the BVM group (P = .001), whereas there was no significant decrease in the HFNC group (P = .17). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups at any of the predefined time points before or after intubation concerning SpO2 , PaO2 /FIO2 , and PaCO2 . Preoxygenation using HFNC before intubation was feasible and safe compared with BVM in critically ill subjects with acute, mild to moderate hypoxemic respiratory failure. There was no significant difference in the mean lowest SpO2 during intubation between the HFNC and the BVM group. There was also no significant difference in SpO2 between the 2 groups at any of the predefined time points. However, on continuous monitoring, there was a significant decrease in SpO2 during the apnea phase before intubation in the BVM group, which was not seen in the HFNC group. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01994928.).

Simon M ，Wachs C ，Braune S ，de Heer G ，Frings D ，Kluge S ... -  《-》

Apnoeic oxygenation via high-flow nasal cannula oxygen combined with non-invasive ventilation preoxygenation for intubation in hypoxaemic patients in the intensive care unit: the single-centre, blinded, randomised controlled OPTINIV trial.

Jaber S ，Monnin M ，Girard M ，Conseil M ，Cisse M ，Carr J ，Mahul M ，Delay JM ，Belafia F ，Chanques G ，Molinari N ，De Jong A ... -  《-》

Nasal high-flow preoxygenation for endotracheal intubation in the critically ill patient: a randomized clinical trial.

Guitton C ，Ehrmann S ，Volteau C ，Colin G ，Maamar A ，Jean-Michel V ，Mahe PJ ，Landais M ，Brule N ，Bretonnière C ，Zambon O ，Vourc'h M ... -  《-》

High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Bag Valve Mask for Preoxygenation during Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cırıl MF ，Akarca M ，Unal Akoglu E ，Cimilli Ozturk T ，Onur Ö ... -  《-》

Sequential application of oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of humidified oxygen via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) alternating with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). We performed a prospective observational study in a 12-bed ICU of a university hospital. All subjects with a PaO2 /FIO2 of ≤300 mm Hg with standard mask oxygen and a breathing frequency of > 30 breaths/min or signs of respiratory distress were included and treated with HFNC first and then NIV. Ventilatory parameters, blood gases, and tolerance were recorded during 2 consecutive sessions of NIV and HFNC. Outcome was assessed after continuation of this noninvasive strategy. Twenty-eight subjects with AHRF were studied, including 23 (82%) with ARDS. Compared with standard oxygen therapy, PaO2 significantly increased from 83 (68-97) mm Hg to 108 (83-140) mm Hg using HFNC and to 125 (97-200) mm Hg using NIV (P<.01), whereas breathing frequency significantly decreased. HFNC was significantly better tolerated than NIV, with a lower score on the visual analog scale. The non-intubated subjects received HFNC for 75 (27-127) h and NIV for 23 (8-31) h. Intubation was required in 10 of 28 subjects (36%), including 8 of 23 subjects with ARDS (35%). After HFNC initiation, a breathing frequency of ≥30 breaths/min was an early factor associated with intubation. HFNC was better tolerated than NIV and allowed for significant improvement in oxygenation and tachypnea compared with standard oxygen therapy in subjects with AHRF, a large majority of whom had ARDS. Thus, HFNC may be used between NIV sessions to avoid marked impairment of oxygenation.

Frat JP ，Brugiere B ，Ragot S ，Chatellier D ，Veinstein A ，Goudet V ，Coudroy R ，Petitpas F ，Robert R ，Thille AW ，Girault C ... -  《-》